- Joined
- May 6, 2009
- Messages
- 2,034
- Points
- 0
That is the CEC vote was in fact a contest of leadership for the SDP and the competition over his censure was nothing but naked party politics.Dear Elephanto
We would not bee having this discussion at all if Dr Chee had clearly admitted to what the rest of us can see. ..
Locke
Spot on, Bro locke !
Chee ill not admit to that, wants us to believe that Chiam resigned in a huff, and that there was no background machivellian manuverings whether lead by him or someone else within the CEC and that Dr Chee is politically white as snow.
There are many salient points in this one para:-
1. yes, Chee is no innocent - certainly not snow white
2. locke seriously, Chiam DID resign in a huff - perhaps never wholeheartedly. His fury blinded him, outrage at his CEC for not supporting him in his desire to censure Chee.
3. yes, agree. there are maneuvers behind the scene against Chiam.
Ling, Cheo, Chairman Wong, young Turk Chee .... all culpable to some degree. But why ?
That Chiam was synonymous with SDP by 1991 was undisputed. I don't know if SDP's great showing in GE'91 had gone to Chiam's head - but he had underestimated the resentment of his party colleagues to his intended/unintended 'autocratic' style. I think Ling/Cheo/Wong & others are nursing unhappiness with Chiam's 'media decrees' & 'party edicts'.
So, these clowns want a move towards more 'collective leadership' & less Chiam as paramount SDP leader.
So they refused to go along with Chiam when he demanded his Chee censures. When Chiam threw in his resignation, they were certainly not prepared & wanted him to remain the public face of SDP while being less dominant within. Chiam's condition for rescinding his resignation was to demand more say for himself & curtailing the CEC's powers. Given this impasse, the reinstatement of Chiam as Sec-Gen became an impossibility.
Ling/Wong/Cheo whether proficiency in English public speaking or charisma were all not suited to be Sec-Gen. So, Chee was their 'United Front' candidate - they thought they could use him & still have influence over the political rookie. Chee, no party wallflower, of course 'reluctantly' agreed to be Ag Sec-Gen, seeing his act as an act of saving SDP. ha ha just a bunch of opportunists whose interests converged at that point in time .... true allies ? In due course, these jokers also cannot submit to Chee's leadership.
When Chiam in a public forum chastised his SDP CEC opponents, they took the opportunity to hold disciplinary proceedings against Chiam.
I always had low opinion of Ling, Cheo & Wong but their expulsion of Chiam was unforgiveable, myopic & poisonous. Don't they realise they are throwing out Chiam from Parliament by expelling him ??!!
The height of arrogance & ignorance ... as if SDP's 1991 performance had nothing to do with Chiam & they are on the verge of seeing more SDP triumphs .....
Anyway, the above is my perception & interpretation of events as an outsider. You are perfectly within your rights to disagree.
As for contempt for Chee, I resented his glucose-aided fast, his Jurong Market public shout-down of PM Goh, his US trip to embarass Goh during his honorary doctorate award ceremony & all his overseas pow-wow & so-called 'fellowship' with other Asian 'democrats'.
In recent years, Chee seemed to have mellowed. SDP also seemed better organized & structured under his leadership.
For now. That is my impression.
But remove Chiam, SPP is nothing compared to a Chee-less SDP.
That is what I mean by leadership & organizational skills & the ability to attract good calibre members to form a leadership echelon.
But one thing though, people like yourself locke & all these people I have commented on, for your resilience & dedication to the Sporean opposition cause, I commend you all.
Last edited: