• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Crumbling of Singapore?

PP-SMC may be absorbed in the next GE.

Yes, likewise JJ SMC may be absorbed.

PAP wants to destroy any legacy that puts them in a bad light. Look at what pap did to Anson SMC.

But Singapore in 2014 is different from Singapore in the 1980s. If pap thinks it can bully the Opposition and Singaporeans, it is badly mistaken. If it absorbs PP SMC into the neighbouring GRCs, it risk losing the GRCs because of PP voters. So it has to decide to let the status quo be and stand a good chance of losing PP or tries to gerrymeander and risk losing GRCs.

Look at how the pap is using govt agencies to harass AJHPE town councils. This strategy will backfire on the pap. I admire how LTK snubbed LHL and VB in parliament
 
Last edited:
agree, JC-SMC looks set to be absorbed too.
Still road side of Telok Kurau to MP-GRC, the canal side of Telok Kurau to EC-GRC.

HUAT AH!!!

yes, absorb JC into MP and gain a higher risk of losing MP GRC
 
Last edited:
not all of JC-SMC goes into MP-GRC lah, the Telok Kurau road will be the thin red line :o:o:o

we will wait and see whether the pap cuts up JC, absorbs it into a GRC or leaves it as it is.

the next GE will be interesting. it may be held next year
 
Last edited:
These GRC monster is slowly turning against it's maker.

the pap reaps what it sows. many of its bad policies are coming back to haunt the pap. AIM, PA, control of MSM, grassroots, rewarding its own people, etc will certainly turn Singaporeans against the pap.

and yet PAP leaders such as george yeo, josephine, etc cant understand why Singaporeans are angry with the pap. to know why Singaporeans are against the pap, my suggestion is for pap to look at how it twists and formulate policies for selfish gains.
 
Last edited:
and yet PAP leaders such as george yeo, josephine, etc cant understand why Singaporeans are angry with the pap. to know why Singaporeans are against the pap, my suggestion is for pap to look at how it twists and formulate policies for selfish gains.

Only a small minority of Singaporeans are angry with the PAP. They're the ones who expect to be spoonfed and are unwilling or too lazy to take advantage of the myriad of opportunities that the PAP has created for everyone.

The majority of the population are very pleased with the PAP for what they have done for the country.
 
Only a small minority of Singaporeans are angry with the PAP. They're the ones who expect to be spoonfed and are unwilling or too lazy to take advantage of the myriad of opportunities that the PAP has created for everyone.

The majority of the population are very pleased with the PAP for what they have done for the country.

you may wish to console the pap that only a small minority of singaporeans are against the pap.

but the figure is sufficient enough for the pap to ask "why are Singaporeans so angry with the pap?"

so whether you are right or the pap is right that there are many Singaporeans who are angry will be clear at the next GE
 
Last edited:
1. MRT Congestion
2. Housing problem
3. Hospital beds shortage
4. Unemployment of locals
5. Increased suicide rate
6. Unhappiness of citizens
7. Road congestion
8. High ERP rates without easing traffic congestion
9. Bus crowdedness
10. National Service for locals, jobs for foreigners
11. PAP running out of idea how to promote economic growth but having to resort to vices such as gambling.
12. Increased social problems and integration due to high influx of cheap, unskilled and unqualified migrant laboour with their 3rd world social behaviour and lawlessness

Are these signs of the crumbling of Singapore? The pap appears to run out of ideas how to bring SG forward but is taking the obvious easy ways out, bringing long term problems to SG.

Are the recent MRT failures precursors to more failures to come? Will there be forthcoming systemic failures of the Transport system, Medical Institutions, Housing issues, social problems?

1. LTY is dismayed that MRTs and buses are not reliable and constantly breakdown
2. YI is dismayed that M1 and Singtel are not perform their duties
3. TCH is dismayed that civil servants are increasingly corrupt
4. GKY is dismayed that there hospitals are short of beds
5. TCJ is dismayed that employers prefer to employ foreigners
6. KBW is dismayed that housing prices are too high
7. NEH is dismayed that Singaporeans are not treating others as they would like to be treated
8. LHK is dismayed that SG's FTAs are not working well
9. VB is dismayed that NEA cant nail WP
10. HSK is dismayed that the education system is not producing employable citizens
11. CCS is dismayed that there are so many poor citizens in SG
12. The mother of all dismays is from LHL who feels that singaporeans are like a pack of hounds going after him .

But have the pap ministers realised they these are all within their purviews and the dismays show their poor performance.

Singaporeans rightly should be angry that the pap can only express dismays and try to blame others for their non performance. It's time they get off their butts and start running their ministries and serve Singapore
 
Last edited:
Singaporeans rightly should be angry that the pap can only express dismays and try to blame others for their non performance. It's time they get off their butts and start running their ministries and serve Singapore

These are all minor issues that would plague any government. There is no instant solution to these problems as societies and economies are open to external influences like never before.

You can vote the PAP out in 2016 but it won't make a scrap of difference. You'd be listing out exactly the same issues come 2021.
 
These are all minor issues that would plague any government. There is no instant solution to these problems as societies and economies are open to external influences like never before.

You can vote the PAP out in 2016 but it won't make a scrap of difference. You'd be listing out exactly the same issues come 2021.

These are just a tip of the iceberg.

For the ministers to acknowledge publicly their dismays, they are certainly politically significant. But the ministers failed to understand what Singaporeans know. We know that these issues are solvable and are under their purviews. By trying to push the blame on to others, the ministers are not taking ownership and are neglecting their work.

Our question to them is..."what have you done?"
 
not all of JC-SMC goes into MP-GRC lah, the Telok Kurau road will be the thin red line :o:o:o

The Registers of Elections are to be revised by Mar 2014. Does it mean that GE is imminent or is this just a regular revision.

Alternative Parties have to remain alert shd a snap GE is called soon
 
electoral boundaries to be re-drawn after the Registers of Elections are being tidied?

yes, electoral boundaries will be redrawn based on the updated registers. but for redrawn boundaries to be any good, election must be held abt six months after.

otherwise register may not be current eg if election is held two years later
 
Singapore's wealth bubble may pop

BY SEAH CHIANG NEE


The city-state has attracted foreign wealth, but economists warn of trouble if tycoons were to pull out in the future.

MONEY, plenty of it! So much is circulating around parts of Singapore – much of it from abroad – that some economists are worried.

After years of success luring in foreign wealth, the city is now experiencing what an analyst calls a “wealth bubble” that is continuing to grow.

Noted global economist Jesse Colombo warned that several bubbles were on the verge of popping, threatening the city with an Iceland-style economic meltdown. He predicted in Forbes that this could happen within years.

They exist in property, Singaporean household debts and the bloated population of migrant workers.

“Singapore (also) has a wealth bubble,” added Colombo, who had earlier forecast America’s housing bubble.

For years, the republic had worked to attract high net-worth foreigners to its shores, a strategy that is unlikely to end any time soon.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said last year: “If I can get another 10 billionaires to move to Singapore and set up their base here ... Singaporeans will be better off...”

He indicated this would be pursued even if it worsens the rich-poor inequality.

(In the last 10 years, the wages of the bottom 20% fell by 10% in real terms, while those for the top one-fifth grew by some 30%.)

“I think Singaporeans will be better off, because they (foreign investors) will bring in business, bring in opportunities, open new doors and create new jobs,” Lee said. “I think that is the attitude with which we must approach this problem.”

He’s following in his father’s footsteps.

In the early 1980s, Lee Kuan Yew started to attract wealthy foreigners here to make up for a shortage of land and natural resources.

Lee, now 90, used to invite wealthy entrepreneurs, including a number of Hong Kong billionaires, to witness the National Day parades as special guests – and gave them permanent residency.

With low taxes, minimal corruption, protective banking laws and the abolishing of estate tax in 2008, his successors have succeeded in attracting more of them here.

Today, Singapore has 27 billionaires, the fifth largest number in the world.

New arrivals included US investor Jim Rogers, a Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin, New Zealander Richard Chandler, Indian telecom tycoon Bhupendra Kumar Modi, several Australians and Hong Kong movie stars.

One in 30 Singaporean residents is today a millionaire – doubling from 2008 to 2012. It has the world’s highest number of millionaires per capita.

The government appears to be unfazed by warnings of potential trouble if foreign tycoons were to pull out one day.

China feels differently. It started to curb the entry of hot money on concerns that capital inflows pose a threat to China’s economy.

Not many Singaporeans agree with their prime minister that having more billionaires necessarily means more investment and jobs.

“Some do invest here, but most simply park their money here and run their businesses outside,” said a retired banker.

They drive up the cost of living for locals, especially in real estate and cars, he added.

Colombo said Singapore’s total wealth rose by 8.7% in the past year alone to reach an average of US$282,000 (RM938,000) per adult.

The danger is that when Singapore’s bubble pops, it would cause “wealth to decline significantly”.

Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy associate dean Donald Low expressed concern about efforts to attract the super-rich here - even if they increase inequality.

“Relying on inflow of foreign monies to finance real estate domestically is often a recipe for financial disaster,” he told The Independent Singapore.

On perspective, the influx of so much money has some impact on the upper class, businessmen and property owners.

Generating investment and jobs rests more with global investors than billionaires looking for a safe place to park their money.

The Prime Minister is right in predicting that if more were to arrive, it would widen the economic gap between rich and poor Singa*poreans.

Whatever benefits they have brought here are being unequally distributed, observers say.

“While the rich have fun, locals are struggling to keep up with the rising cost of living,” a foreign TV journalist wrote.

Earlier, under pressure from Europe, Singapore banks started to scrutinise foreign account holders as stricter tax evasion measures kicked in.

This is to decide whether to send high-risk clients packing, said one source. They include wanted people accused of corruption elsewhere, criminals and drug traffickers.

Foreign politicians have charged that, as banking secrecy is lifted in Switzerland, some tax evaders are shifting their attention here.

Emotionally struggling Singaporeans are no different from people elsewhere when they see splurging wealth around them as they struggle to hold their jobs.

PM Lee’s remarks, saying the presence of 10 foreign billionaires is more desirable than levelling economic inequality, has hurt his popularity.

An undergraduate asked incredulously: “I don’t believe he said it. Was he quoted correctly?”

Adding to his woes is the growing class divide in society.

The recent misbehaviour of some wealthy residents – both foreigners and locals – in flaunting their wealth or thumbing their noses at ordinary people is adding public blame on his policies.

Law Minister K. Shanmugam told the Financial Times that the rich-poor gap was very obvious.

Recalling how he was cut off while driving one evening, first by a Ferrari and then by a Porsche, the minister added: “The middle class in Singapore has found costs rising because of energy, food and so on.”

They find themselves squeezed since they don’t get the government subsidies that the poorest 20% gets, he added.

> Seah Chiang Nee is an international journalist of 40 years. The views expressed are entirely his own.

http://www.thestar.com.my/Opinion/C.../2014/02/08/Singapores-wealth-bubble-may-pop/
 
Singapore's wealth bubble may pop

BY SEAH CHIANG NEE


The city-state has attracted foreign wealth, but economists warn of trouble if tycoons were to pull out in the future.

MONEY, plenty of it! So much is circulating around parts of Singapore – much of it from abroad – that some economists are worried.



They find themselves squeezed since they don’t get the government subsidies that the poorest 20% gets, he added.

> Seah Chiang Nee is an international journalist of 40 years. The views expressed are entirely his own.

http://www.thestar.com.my/Opinion/C.../2014/02/08/Singapores-wealth-bubble-may-pop/


The wealth bubble is just one potential problem.There are many more problems which the pap has created:

1. Credibility gap
2. Internal unhappiness
3. Property bubble.
4. Poverty trap
5. Inadequate amenities
6. Social problems
7. Integration problem
8. Disunity
9. Aged poor
10. Distrust of pap leadership

etc
 
agree, JC-SMC looks set to be absorbed too.
Still road side of Telok Kurau to MP-GRC, the canal side of Telok Kurau to EC-GRC.

HUAT AH!!!

Budget 2014 shows how bankrupt the pap is. We must not be swayed by their rhetoric. Analyse and we see Tharman said a lot of nothing. More burden to the employers and people.

More cheap funds for HC to gamble and for the pap to increase medical bills
 
Last edited:
These GRC monster is slowly turning against it's maker.

Do you know what happens to pensioners who already have their medical needs covered by the govt?

Do these pensioners need to pay for Medishield Life?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top