- Joined
- May 26, 2009
- Messages
- 17,247
- Points
- 63
I thought someone here said that would be quite a number of new talents.
should be...but the question is how many?
I thought someone here said that would be quite a number of new talents.
Your statements are quite baseless if not oxymoronic .Because it was common for us Chinese to have large families.A family of 5 to 10 was the norm among Chinese families in the 50s.The very reason why some countries banned importation of Chinese women into their countries long ago.Malays on the other hand adhered to their religion .Any child is god's gift is their belief.Therfore they don't go out of their way for birth control.
The point being neither the Chinese nor the Malays outbreed each other for political reasons.Whereas you and LKY are tainting it with politics.Now,let's get to the bottom your calculator,your assertions that' LKY succeeded in getting all the ethnic groups to operate at replacement levels and no higher' absolutely false.If we left Singapore at the mercy of it's natural progression say with the assumption whaterver the % of racial mix maybe .....The total number of current population today will not be the same.
Here's the proof----http://www.google.com.sg/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&met_y=sp_pop_totl&idim=country:SGP&dl=en&hl=en&q=singapore+population
Look at the Sinapore;s poulation graph as provided by the world bank.From 1960 to 1970 & from 1970 to 1980....the population growth is constant....Only from 1980 to 2010 it shoots up towards the sky.Due of course to the wanton importation of foreigners.
Now,lets compare this with the very cite you provided......http://toolserver.org/~al/visualize...+population&columns=all&width=1000&height=500
1970;-Chinese 77%--Malays 14.8%
1980;_Chinese 78.3%---Malays 14.4%
1990..Chinese 77.7%----Malays 14.1%
2000;Chinese 76.8%-----Malays 13.9%
2010 Chinese 74.1%......Malays 13.4%
You are blatantly lying Sam.Because the Malays were declining percentage wise in the last 40 years.What is even more interesting is that the Chinese were increasing percentage wise during 1970 1990---which does support your or LKY to flood Singapore with foreigners to balance the racial thingy.
Either you blindly regurgitating LKY mantra....or you are hoping nobody will see through your bluff.
Because now you are caught with your own 'proof' so as to speak.
Nice-Gook said:Now,lets compare this with the very cite you provided......
1970;-Chinese 77%--Malays 14.8%
1980;_Chinese 78.3%---Malays 14.4%
1990..Chinese 77.7%----Malays 14.1%
2000;Chinese 76.8%-----Malays 13.9%
2010 Chinese 74.1%......Malays 13.4%
Because now you are caught with your own 'proof' so as to speak.
That proves my point. As both Chinese and Malays percentage shares drop, where does the slack goes to? Indians.
Not really lah.Look closely.
The Malays were dropping % consistently for the past 40 years....Whereas the Chinese were actually increasing during the 1970 to 1990 when foreigners were not imported nor figured in our statistics.
The importation of non muslims didn't start in the 21st century. It started way back during Singapore's early industrialisation phase with the Malaysian Chinese and Indians. The difference then was that they didn't stand out like a sore thumb. They blended in perfectly.
In the industry that I was working in, more than 50% of the engineers/techs/supervisors were non muslim Malaysians.
I've seen the policy at work first hand. I had Malay friends with relatives living just across the causeway. Try as they may, they could never get PR in Singapore. In the meantime, Chinese Malaysians were offered residency on a platter. You don't have to believe me. I didn't believe it myself at the time until I saw how things worked from personal experience.
At the end of the day, Singaporeans have to decide for themselves what's best for them.
In 2010, the population of Singapore was about 4 million.
Nice-Gook said:Not really lah.Look closely.
The Malays were dropping % consistently for the past 40 years....Whereas the Chinese were actually increasing during the 1970 to 1990 when foreigners were not imported nor figured in our statistics.
The WP is no different. Just look at the number who entered parliament by hiding inside LTK's chinaman underwear.
Pls don't throw red herrings here and there ,I had read of Singapore's early history much more than anybody here.Talking about past eh?
Did you know that 1950 or on about the Chinese poulation was about 51%?....Did Singapore wither because of it?
Leongsam;913001 In the industry that I was working in said:Yup,you are right.Tons of Malaysian Chinese work in Singapore--even today.But they are not Singaporeans by citizenship.So technically speaking % there are more ethnic Chinese in Singapore at any one time.The ratio could very well be for each 5% Malays 85% ethnic Chinese are economically engaged in Singapore at any one time.This applies even if our Malay poulation is say 25% and they can remain unemployed whereas foreign Chinese can be gainfully employed in Singapore.This will not show in our population statistics.
The point being that LKY 's Malay as our enemies is merely a boogey man.
Sam for heaven stop living in your own world.Or heaven forbids,bipolar dis order?
Look at the statistics provided by the World Bank--it not what I churned out.
The total population of Singapore's population is about 5 millions.
You cannot compare the politics of the colonial and immediate post colonial era with today's brand of Wahhabi Islam.
However, even with the relatively benign brand of Islam at the time, Singaporean Chinese did not have an easy time during the 1963 to 1965 period when Singapore was part of a Malay state. I lived through personally. I certainly wouldn't want go through it again. It's not exactly pleasant having to be constantly mindful of the so called "religious sensitivities" of the ruling class.
The point being that LKY 's Malay as our enemies is merely a boogey man.
They aren't the enemy in the conventional sense. However, you have to realise that in today's brand of Islam that is enveloping the world, secularism is not acceptable form of govt. To a muslim, there is no separation between govt and religion. They are all one and the same.
I refute that....WP is not PAP and their road to parliament was strewn with obstacles, courtesy of their opponents. They are definitely not cut from the same cloth as the PAP MP's. All of them added their weight and definitely not passengers.
Not really lah.Look closely.
The Malays were dropping % consistently for the past 40 years....Whereas the Chinese were actually increasing during the 1970 to 1990 when foreigners were not imported nor figured in our statistics.
TracyTan866 said:will the racial polarisation in SG contribute to SG's crumble?
The PAP should look beyond party interests and focus on national interest.