- Joined
- May 26, 2009
- Messages
- 17,247
- Points
- 63
deleted.....
ADD
13. Even the handicap are not spared. Were they collateral damage in the clash between Govt and dissenters. From every angle I look, the Govt, MPs, YMCA, Han HH are all responsible for the ugly show at Hong Lim yesterday. You are right. Singapore is indeed crumbling.
Any Singapore politician who fights for foreigners and proclaim that they must enjoy equal Singaporeans' rights when these foreigners do not shoulder equal Singaporeans' responsibilities is a traitor. Worse is when these politicians use pap control mass media to scold Singaporeans who fight that equal rights come with equal responsibilities as xenophobic. These Singaporean politicians are a disgrace and a danger to Singapore and cause wide foreigners/singaporeans divide in SG.
Guess who is the main culprit in this area?
Any Singapore politician who fights for foreigners and proclaim that they must enjoy equal Singaporeans' rights when these foreigners do not shoulder equal Singaporeans' responsibilities is a traitor. Worse is when these politicians use pap control mass media to scold Singaporeans who fight that equal rights come with equal responsibilities as xenophobic. These Singaporean politicians are a disgrace and a danger to Singapore and cause wide foreigners/singaporeans divide in SG.
Guess who is the main culprit in this area?
Kindly tell us who. Been a long time since I read Singapore newspaper and news website.
Yes. And I suspect there's a deeper reason besides the obvious manpower, political economical reason which is the old fart discriminate against the majority of the local breed 土生土長 Singaporeans.
But that's just my hypothesis.
I am glad that you agree that Singapore politicians must fight for a better Singapore and better life for Singaporeans. Singapore politicians must be of Singaporeans, by Singaporeans and for Singaporeans
What is a Singaporean?
No, I am just curious, what is your definition of a Singaporean. Who is a Singaporean? And I am not talking about i/c or birth certificate...
No, I am just curious, what is your definition of a Singaporean. Who is a Singaporean? And I am not talking about i/c or birth certificate...
I am a simple person. To me a Singaporean is a citizen of Singapore who loves the country, will defend Singapore when it is threatened and will work for the betterment of other fellow citizens.
You are right. Some people have warped and complicated ideas of who a Singaporean is. LHL thinks that he can import a PRC from a China village and make him a Singaporean overnight. I disagree with him. A Singaporean is not just a person who holds a Singapore passport. A Singaporean must embrace the values, ethos and feel proud when Majulah Singapura is sung, etc.
Who do you think is a Singaporean?
What do you think of PAP's knee jerk reaction to open up the SAF to Volunteers and allow them to choose their preferred vocations considering that true blue SG guys are compelled to do two years NS without option?
Someohow I just find that the PAP machinery is too big, Singaporeans are being brainwashed into many things. We are heavily influnenced by the PAP gahmen and their political leaders.
To me NS is not the priority issue. The priority issue is our identity. Who are we? What is our way of life? What are our values? What are we defending besides this piece of land? After settling those urgent issue, then talk about NS. Else, 爲誰而戰??
The more important question, if we keep our sovereignty our land, but spiritually we are devoid, we are Juz another mindless pap cog and digit
Anyway, I agree with u, everyone should do ns, no exception for new immigrants.