- Joined
- Feb 16, 2012
- Messages
- 498
- Points
- 28
I'm not sure what you mean by "substantial"; is it at least 5%?GIC is a substantial shareholder of Las Vegas Sands which in turn owns MBS.
If yes, do you know which brokers/subsidiaries GIC uses: http://investors.morningstar.com/ownership/shareholders-major.html?t=lvs
Then it seems that the Ministry of Finance lied when it said this in early 2009:In late 2008 when LVS was on the verge of going belly up, Old Fart directed GIC to pump in US$5.5b into LVS otherwise they were not able to complete the MBS construction.
http://app.mof.gov.sg/TemNewsroomDe...cmpar_year=2009&news_sid=20100322509074580415
"If the Member is asking if the Government has directed or suggested to any of its agencies or companies linked to it that they should invest in Las Vegas Sands or its subsidiaries and associated entities, the answer is a categorical no."
Wasn't it US$2 billion?If GIC didn't pump in US$5.5b into LVS, Mr Sheldon Adelson was going to declare bankrupt and the development of MBS would have been abandoned.
If the MBS development was abandoned half way through construction, where would the old bastard put his face?
That is why after Adelson came down to negotiate with him for one week at the Istana, he directed GIC to put up US$5.5b which turned out to be a blessing in disguise.
http://www.sammyboy.com/archive/index.php/t-21843.html
Or was another US$3+ billion pumped in later on?
Anyway, if you are right, Bloomberg also seems to have lied in late 2008 when it said this:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a87XCYeeu1z4&refer=asia
"Las Vegas Sands, which owns the Venetian resorts in Las Vegas and Macau, said last month it has enough money to finish its Singapore casino without help from the city-state’s government after the company raised $2.1 billion."
Last edited: