- Joined
- Sep 11, 2010
- Messages
- 37,323
- Points
- 113
The first ones were those that ate the wild animals? They should be among the first few of the 106 who are dead now.Airborne............ droplet...........
The first ones were those that ate the wild animals? They should be among the first few of the 106 who are dead now.Airborne............ droplet...........
The first ones were those that ate the wild animals? They should be among the first few of the 106 who are dead now.
The first ones were those that ate the wild animals? They should be among the first few of the 106 who are dead now.
Person to person transmission then. The 1/3 had to have contact with the 2/3 who were at the seafood center or ate the wild animals.Some reports indicated that about a third of the first 41 cases reported on 2nd Jan had no links to the Wuhan HuaNan Seafood Centre.
Some reports indicated that about a third of the first 41 cases reported on 2nd Jan had no links to the Wuhan HuaNan Seafood Centre.
I think it is still early days, and the commies are still trying to find their feet. But yes, they are selfish and secretive. I am guessing fatalities would depend on quite a few variables. Body immunity system, age, health, allergies, will to live, etc. Just like the common flu is common but fatal to some?Yeah, I was wondering whether cowbellc was asking how it first started or the mode of transmission. That's why I think it's useful for China to provide a profile of the fatal cases so far, so that the rest of the world can understand the situation better. But knowing China, looks like we all tankuku.
Person to person transmission then. The 1/3 had to have contact with the 2/3 who were at the seafood center or ate the wild animals.
I think it is still early days, and the commies are still trying to find their feet. But yes, they are selfish and secretive. I am guessing fatalities would depend on quite a few variables. Body immunity system, age, health, allergies, will to live, etc. Just like the common flu is common but fatal to some?
Don't need overworked medical personnel to compile these, China has plenty of bureaucrats who can do this admin job.
Added the will to live to try inject a little humour lah. And yes, for the benefit of mankind, China needs to do the right thing. They caused this!I think you are right on the factors, will to live perhaps less a factor for this type of disease.
But all these info on the fatal cases will certainly be useful. Don't need overworked medical personnel to compile these, China has plenty of bureaucrats who can do this admin job.
I think they are releasing some info, bit by bit.
http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-01/28/c_138739575.htm
Good that they are releasing more info.I think they are releasing some info, bit by bit.
http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-01/28/c_138739575.htm
Besides this wuhan virus, I believe this is also the flu season, right?
Thanks. You sure are on top of things.US CDC reported some 15 million cases to date and about 8200 deaths.
Thanks. You sure are on top of things.
Upsize?Added the will to live to try inject a little humour lah. And yes, for the benefit of mankind, China needs to do the right thing. They caused this!
Besides this wuhan virus, I believe this is also the flu season, right? I have friends and family members down with the flu. What a fucking perfect storm.
But he is no expert. Was advised to say that by his sinkie "experts". Real world experts with years of experience can already see where this wuhan virus is heading.At this point in time, Pinky is still right, as much as this Wuhan virus can spread very fast, the fatality rate remains at around 2.5%
SARS was about 10% fatality, MERS about 30%.