CNN News: At least 19 of the 27 books in the New Testament are forgeries

[drifteri]

You can make all the irrelevant references you like to make.

You still insist koran is irrelevant in a discussion on LOT?

 

[Frodo]

You still insist koran is irrelevant in a discussion on LOT?

Yes. In case you don't know, the Quran is not the Christian's Scripture and authority. Simple analogy. Singaporeans under Singapore law only, doesn't matter if other countries also talk about similar things, for example, purchase of landed property. Betcha won't get it or else would start stretching the analogy until it breaks and miss the point.

 

[drifteri]

Yes. In case you don't know, the Quran is not the Christian's Scripture and authority. Simple analogy. Singaporeans under Singapore law only, doesn't matter if other countries also talk about similar things, for example, purchase of landed property. Betcha won't get it or else would start stretching the analogy until it breaks and miss the point.

The debate is not on whether Quran is the authority and scripture of christard. Are you really that gong? I repeat, all the while I am talking about LOT of the abrahamic faith. Why are you so gong? Dumbass Gong Kia!

Your analogy is very stupid and out of context. Even when I talked about malaysia durian, why I cannot reference thai durian? And all the while, I am talking about durian. Gong cheebye, why are you so gong? Gong cheebye! You still very gong!

 

[Frodo]

The debate is not on whether Quran is the authority and scripture of christard. Are you really that gong? I repeat, all the while I am talking about LOT of the abrahamic faith. Why are you so gong? Dumbass Gong Kia!

Your analogy is very stupid and out of context. Even when I talked about malaysia durian, why I cannot reference thai durian? And all the while, I am talking about durian. Gong cheebye, why are you so gong? Gong cheebye! You still very gong!

You THINK you are talking about the Lot of the Bible, but clearly you are wrong. He is not a prophet in the Bible, and bringing in the Quran does not help you one bit. And yes, the debate is not about whether the Quran is the authority and Scripture of the Christian, there is no debate on this at all. I am just telling you that you have no case, not then, not now, probably not ever.

 

[drifteri]

You THINK you are talking about the Lot of the Bible, but clearly you are wrong. He is not a prophet in the Bible, and bringing in the Quran does not help you one bit. And yes, the debate is not about whether the Quran is the authority and Scripture of the Christian, there is no debate on this at all. I am just telling you that you have no case, not then, not now, probably not ever.

I am talking about LOT of the Abrahamic faiths, not LOT of the ring. lol!

 

[Frodo]

I am talking about LOT of the Abrahamic faiths, not LOT of the ring. lol!

According to the Bible Abraham had one nephew Lot and he was never called a prophet or acted as such. If you insist he was a prophet then judging by the Bible you are wrong. And you being wrong in such matters is hardly surprising.

 

[drifteri]

According to the Bible Abraham had one nephew Lot and he was never called a prophet or acted as such. If you insist he was a prophet then judging by the Bible you are wrong. And you being wrong in such matters is hardly surprising.

I was talking of lot of the abrahmic faith. Ask your umpire, gong cheebye.

 

[Frodo]

I was talking of lot of the abrahmic faith. Ask your umpire, gong cheebye.

Let's be very generous and grant you this irrelevant point, it is still 2 vs 1, and I don't see how you can ever win this one.

Don't kick against the goads. Betcha still don't know what that means.

 

[drifteri]

Let's be very generous and grant you this irrelevant point, it is still 2 vs 1, and I don't see how you can ever win this one.

Don't kick against the goads. Betcha still don't know what that means.

Gong cheebye, you only good are throwing chiam words to show you are very highly educated. Always got no ground, you proved to us how bible bred dumb cheebye kia like you. Gong cheebye.

I was talking about LOT of the abrahamic faiths. whahahaha.

 

[Frodo]

Gong cheebye, you only good are throwing chiam words to show you are very highly educated. Always got no ground, you proved to us how bible bred dumb cheebye kia like you. Gong cheebye.

I was talking about LOT of the abrahamic faiths. whahahaha.

I am throwing about words to show how abysmally ignorant the village atheist is. Betcha don't know kicking against the goads is a phrase spoken by Jesus.

You are NOT talking about the Lot of the Hebrew and Christian faith which do not recognise Lot as a prophet.

 

[drifteri]

Islam is not part of the abrahamic faith? Why?

 

[Kinanna]

Islam is not part of the abrahamic faith? Why?

My friend drift. There are stark differences in the way the three faiths view Jesus.
The Jews disregarded Him as a false messiah. The Christians on the other end of the spectrum ,believe that Jesus is God Himself and the Muslims believe He was a prophet of God.
Now the question you have to ask yourself is do you believe that Jesus existed?
Forget about Lot for awhile. First questions first.

 

[drifteri]

My friend drift. There are stark differences in the way the three faiths view Jesus.
The Jews disregarded Him as a false messiah. The Christians on the other end of the spectrum ,believe that Jesus is God Himself and the Muslims believe He was a prophet of God.
Now the question you have to ask yourself is do you believe that Jesus existed?
Forget about Lot for awhile. First questions first.

You should already know my answer, it is not a belief but a fact. The first Council of Nicea, Jesus was created by a vote.
Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea

History don't lie.

 

[Kinanna]

You should already know my answer, it is not a belief but a fact. The first Council of Nicea, Jesus was created by a vote.
Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea

So in your understanding is that Jesus never existed?

Council of Nicea came together to form a consensus on who Jesus really is. It wasn't formed to create Jesus.

And it came about 325years after Jesus.

But you failed to understand my question. Do you believe that Jesus existed?

 

[drifteri]

You should already know my answer, it is not a belief but a fact. The first Council of Nicea, Jesus was created by a vote.
Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea

So in your understanding is that Jesus never existed?

Council of Nicea came together to form a consensus on who Jesus really is. It wasn't formed to create Jesus.

And it came about 325years after Jesus.

But you failed to understand my question. Do you believe that Jesus existed?

The answer is cleared, I don't believe Jesus existed! Jesus was plagarised. Christainity is one of the biggest lie in history.

Do you believe Jesus existed?

 

[drifteri]

Some christains believe in the spiritual Jesus, not the historical one. They treat the bible as allegory.

 

[Frodo]

You should already know my answer, it is not a belief but a fact. The first Council of Nicea, Jesus was created by a vote.
Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea

History don't lie.

What about historians?

 

[Frodo]

The answer is cleared, I don't believe Jesus existed! Jesus was plagarised. Christainity is one of the biggest lie in history.

Do you believe Jesus existed?

So can you explain why this is the year 2013?

Hint: something to do with Jesus' existence and the coming public holiday.

 

[Frodo]

Some christains believe in the spiritual Jesus, not the historical one. They treat the bible as allegory.

Some Christians.

 

[drifteri]

What about historians?

Gong cheebye kia Can you name any?