Chinks being attacked in the USA? I guess what goes round comes round

[Leongsam]

‘No blacks’: Evicted, harassed and targeted in China for their race amid coronavirus

In images from video, displaced Africans roam Guangzhou, China, on April 7, unable to find a hotel that will accept them. Eventually, police take some to a station.
(Video taken in Guangzhou)

By Alice SuBeijing Bureau Chief

April 16, 2020 12:09 PM PT

BEIJING —

Elo started cooking as soon as he heard about the boys on the street. The Nigerian trader opened an informal restaurant in Foshan, a manufacturing city half an hour’s train ride from Guangzhou, where dozens of Africans became homeless last week.

Evictions from homes and apartments started when Guangzhou authorities announced that five Nigerians had tested positive for COVID-19. Within days, a campaign was launched to test and track all Africans in the port city.

The sudden and sweeping move was consistent with China’s response to the coronavirus. But it was propelled by a troubling logic that targeted people based on race rather than their contact history. The measure ignited a diplomatic outcry and a crisis on Guangzhou’s streets.

Some of the displaced Africans were longtime residents forced from their homes. Others were businessmen who’d completed 14-day quarantines, but then couldn’t find any hotels that would accept them.

They roamed the streets in the rain and slept under highway overpasses, huddled on the pavement in face masks. They filmed videos of police shouting at them, pressing young men to a wall, and of signs posted in apartment buildings and restaurants — including McDonald’s — saying: “No blacks.”

 

[Leongsam]

 

[Leongsam]

Disgusting chink attack on good, honest African...

 

[Leongsam]

 

[whoami]

No one race is perfect! Only Islam can unite all races. Go to any Masjid and u will witness all races praying together in congragation. Go to Mecca and u will see all kind of colours, nationalities, races worshipping side by side. Whether ur sultan, king, president, PM, cleaners, beggars, rich, poor, etc etc....all will prostrate together and worship the One True God ie. Allah azzawajal Allah Hu Akbar!.

 

[Leongsam]

No one race is perfect! Only Islam can unite all races. Go to any Masjid and u will witness all races praying together in congragation. Go to Mecca and u will see all kind of colours, nationalities, races worshipping side by side. Whether ur sultan, king, president, PM, cleaners, beggars, rich, poor, etc etc....all will prostrate together and worship the One True God ie. Allah azzawajal Allah Hu Akbar!.

Islam can't even unite itself. The biggest killer of muslims are other muslims!

The biggest Muslim killers on the planet are…other Muslims
Amjad Malik

4-5 minutes


It is a hard fact we just don’t want to face but the biggest killers of Muslims are other Muslims.
Clearly, this won’t bode well with some readers of this news site who are quick to blame western powers for their intervention in the Middle East.
We are keen to blame atrocities on superpowers but why do we shy away from facing the hard facts – Muslims are killing other Muslims in bigger numbers than anyone else.
The sad but undeniable fact is at this stage in the history of the Middle East we have opposing Muslim powers killing other Muslims in their thousands.
This is being done either directly or through proxy wars.
Saudi Arabia is involved in a bloody and brutal war in Yemen. War has been raging inside Yemen for over two years and during that time Saudi Arabia has unleashed a barrage of highly sophisticated weaponry upon civilians in the nation.
The country is suffering from a cholera outbreak and the UN recently reported that three million Yemeni children are acutely malnourished.
As Saudi Arabia looks to suppress the Houthi movement, which supports Yemen's Zaidi Shia Muslim minority, Iran is countering this with its own brutal onslaught.
Yemen is a battleground for Saudi Arabia and Iran and in the middle are the people of Yemen.
Yet, this war has hardly seemed to be a focal point for many Muslim charitable appeals in recent years. Barring Islamic Relief who ran a dedicated appeal during Ramadan many mosques, clearly supporting the Saudi Arabian rhetoric, have simply ignored this murderous war.
Our focus though has been on Syria.
In Syria, the Russian and Iranian backed President Asad has systematically killed thousands of Muslims and those supporting rebel groups.
In this quagmire we have countless extremist Muslim groups in Syria and Iraq who are killing men, women and children.
In Afghanistan we have a government backed by western powers which is waging a war against a Muslim group who wishes to either free or enslave (depending upon how you see it) the population.
The simple undeniable fact is that we have Muslims orchestrating the murder of other Muslims.
Western powers and Russia are guilty of arming these nations but those detonating the bombs and pulling the trigger are other Muslims.
But we don’t want to face these facts when we discuss these situations on social media and in our groups. We find it quite easy to blame the superpowers for helping to create chaotic situations.
Some reading these words will point out that the actions of western backed nations and Russia have led to this ultimate state of chaos. It is they who for strategic needs have created such a void which can only be filled with bombs, bullets and a constant state of war.
It is far too easy though to blame the larger more powerful nations for creating these wars.
They, after all, have a long history of creating mistrust between Muslims. So it must be their fault that these wars take place.
We go to bed safe in the knowledge that Muslims generally do not ‘out of choice’ kill other Muslims. They are engineered to do so. This helps some of us justify killings whenever we see them on TV.
There is a level of stage management to wars and killings and Muslims are the ones who suffer as the superpowers look to exploit the oil wealth in the area.
The question we need to really explore is that if for any reason the weapons supplies stopped, if the superpowers decided for a moment to leave the Middle East to its own devices would the war in Yemen suddenly stop? Would peace in Syria be achieved?
Would there be peace in Afghanistan? Would the bombs stop going off in Pakistan?
Would Muslims stop killing other Muslims?

 

[whoami]

Islam can't even unite itself. The biggest killer of muslims are other muslims!

The biggest Muslim killers on the planet are…other Muslims
Amjad Malik

4-5 minutes


It is a hard fact we just don’t want to face but the biggest killers of Muslims are other Muslims.
Clearly, this won’t bode well with some readers of this news site who are quick to blame western powers for their intervention in the Middle East.
We are keen to blame atrocities on superpowers but why do we shy away from facing the hard facts – Muslims are killing other Muslims in bigger numbers than anyone else.
The sad but undeniable fact is at this stage in the history of the Middle East we have opposing Muslim powers killing other Muslims in their thousands.
This is being done either directly or through proxy wars.
Saudi Arabia is involved in a bloody and brutal war in Yemen. War has been raging inside Yemen for over two years and during that time Saudi Arabia has unleashed a barrage of highly sophisticated weaponry upon civilians in the nation.
The country is suffering from a cholera outbreak and the UN recently reported that three million Yemeni children are acutely malnourished.
As Saudi Arabia looks to suppress the Houthi movement, which supports Yemen's Zaidi Shia Muslim minority, Iran is countering this with its own brutal onslaught.
Yemen is a battleground for Saudi Arabia and Iran and in the middle are the people of Yemen.
Yet, this war has hardly seemed to be a focal point for many Muslim charitable appeals in recent years. Barring Islamic Relief who ran a dedicated appeal during Ramadan many mosques, clearly supporting the Saudi Arabian rhetoric, have simply ignored this murderous war.
Our focus though has been on Syria.
In Syria, the Russian and Iranian backed President Asad has systematically killed thousands of Muslims and those supporting rebel groups.
In this quagmire we have countless extremist Muslim groups in Syria and Iraq who are killing men, women and children.
In Afghanistan we have a government backed by western powers which is waging a war against a Muslim group who wishes to either free or enslave (depending upon how you see it) the population.
The simple undeniable fact is that we have Muslims orchestrating the murder of other Muslims.
Western powers and Russia are guilty of arming these nations but those detonating the bombs and pulling the trigger are other Muslims.
But we don’t want to face these facts when we discuss these situations on social media and in our groups. We find it quite easy to blame the superpowers for helping to create chaotic situations.
Some reading these words will point out that the actions of western backed nations and Russia have led to this ultimate state of chaos. It is they who for strategic needs have created such a void which can only be filled with bombs, bullets and a constant state of war.
It is far too easy though to blame the larger more powerful nations for creating these wars.
They, after all, have a long history of creating mistrust between Muslims. So it must be their fault that these wars take place.
We go to bed safe in the knowledge that Muslims generally do not ‘out of choice’ kill other Muslims. They are engineered to do so. This helps some of us justify killings whenever we see them on TV.
There is a level of stage management to wars and killings and Muslims are the ones who suffer as the superpowers look to exploit the oil wealth in the area.
The question we need to really explore is that if for any reason the weapons supplies stopped, if the superpowers decided for a moment to leave the Middle East to its own devices would the war in Yemen suddenly stop? Would peace in Syria be achieved?
Would there be peace in Afghanistan? Would the bombs stop going off in Pakistan?
Would Muslims stop killing other Muslims?

I know u will come to this conclusion. Those killing are more to political in nature. Nothing to do with Islam. Clearly stated in the Quran Muslims are not to kill others other than self defence and not suppose to discriminate other races.

 

[eatshitndie]

even gang of chinks beat up chinks.

 

[eatshitndie]

chinks and tiongs are great at beating up one another.

 

[QANONSG]

Our Messiah Trump is offering a reward to anyone willing to kill or maim an Asian. If you are white, then you will be rewarded with a personal audience with his highness, as soon as the temple Mar A Largo is cleansed after a virus outbreak. He is offering $50,000 for every Asian dead, and if you make it TV, then Trump will pay all legal bills and endorse you for Congress. Several seats in Florida are coming up in 2022 and our Republican Party needs more able killers. We have several high profile members including Marjorie Taylor Greene, a wonderful woman who will tell you guns are great and Jews started the fires in California with Space lasers

 

[Hypocrite-The]

‘No blacks’: Evicted, harassed and targeted in China for their race amid coronavirus

In images from video, displaced Africans roam Guangzhou, China, on April 7, unable to find a hotel that will accept them. Eventually, police take some to a station.
(Video taken in Guangzhou)

By Alice SuBeijing Bureau Chief

April 16, 2020 12:09 PM PT

BEIJING —

Elo started cooking as soon as he heard about the boys on the street. The Nigerian trader opened an informal restaurant in Foshan, a manufacturing city half an hour’s train ride from Guangzhou, where dozens of Africans became homeless last week.

Evictions from homes and apartments started when Guangzhou authorities announced that five Nigerians had tested positive for COVID-19. Within days, a campaign was launched to test and track all Africans in the port city.

The sudden and sweeping move was consistent with China’s response to the coronavirus. But it was propelled by a troubling logic that targeted people based on race rather than their contact history. The measure ignited a diplomatic outcry and a crisis on Guangzhou’s streets.

Some of the displaced Africans were longtime residents forced from their homes. Others were businessmen who’d completed 14-day quarantines, but then couldn’t find any hotels that would accept them.

They roamed the streets in the rain and slept under highway overpasses, huddled on the pavement in face masks. They filmed videos of police shouting at them, pressing young men to a wall, and of signs posted in apartment buildings and restaurants — including McDonald’s — saying: “No blacks.”

Why dont these niggers go back to where they come from? Cantoland for cantos...all non cantos should fuck back to where they came from.even northern ah tiongs

 

[whoami]

even gang of chinks beat up chinks.

Wonder who started the racial riot of 1964.

Hokkien-Teochew Riots (1854)

The Hokkien-Teochew Riots, also known as the Great Riots of 1854 or the Five Catties of Rice Riots, began on 5 May 1854. The riots stemmed from conflicts between the Hokkien and Teochew communities in Singapore. It was also suggested that secret societies were involved in the riots, especially the Ngee Heng (Ghee Hin) society, which had splintered into Hokkien and Teochew branches, but the extent of their involvement is uncertain.1 The riots lasted for at least 10 days, and led to the death of approximately 500 people and the destruction of some 300 homes. The riots are considered to be one of the most severe outbreaks of violent conflict within the Chinese community in 19th-century Singapore.2

Background
In the early 1850s, conflict between the Hokkien and Teochew communities arose over the control of pepper and gambier plantations, as well as lucrative revenue farms attached to them. The Hokkien merchant community’s increasing dominance in this economic sector was noticed, leading to dissatisfaction among the Teochews.3 This coincided with a period of rice shortages and high rice prices due to reduced imports from Java.4

At the same time, an unusually large number of Chinese immigrants had arrived in Singapore in 1853. Many of these immigrants were members of the Xiao Dao Hui (Short Dagger Sect) that had fled to Singapore after participating in a failed rebellion in Amoy against the Qing imperial government. These political refugees were well armed and considered to be more predisposed to violence than other Chinese immigrants, who mainly came to Singapore seeking employment.5 European observer C. B. Buckley reported that disagreements emerged when the local Hokkien community refused to join in a subscription fund to aid the rebels, of whom a majority were reportedly Teochew. This caused tension between the Hokkien and Teochew communities.6

Outbreak of violence
Violence first erupted on 5 May over a dispute between a Hokkien shopkeeper and a Teochew buyer regarding the price of rice.7 The argument drew the attention of bystanders, who took sides based on their affiliations, thus escalating the situation. This resulted in intense street fighting between the two communities. Shops were smashed and looted amid the chaos.8

Upon the first outburst of violence, Police Superintendent Thomas Dunman called for military reinforcements to supplement the police force, but Governor William Butterworth, who failed to comprehend the gravity of the situation, overruled his initial requests.9 Instead, Butterworth took it upon himself to survey the troubled areas, whereupon he was attacked by a mob.10

When it became evident that the police force was unequal to the task of suppressing the riots, the military as well as contingents of marines from British men-of-war, berthed in the harbour, were summoned to aid in restoring order. European volunteers were also appointed as special constables to help contain the spread of violence.11 Influential Chinese businessmen and community leaders, such as Tan Kim Seng, rendered assistance by mediating with the headmen of the various secret societies.12 An appeal was also made to the Temenggong of Johore for assistance; in response, he sent 200 Malay soldiers as reinforcements.13

Despite these efforts, the rioting continued to spread from the town to the rural areas after the first two days, to areas such as Paya Lebar, Siglap and Bukit Timah where many Chinese resided. Colonial reports suggested that the violence in the countryside was more intense and killings more widespread than they had been in the town area.14 On 10 May, five days after the start of the riots, the colonial authorities implemented a new course of action. Divisions of troops were transported by steamer to the corners of the island, from where they marched towards the town areas. The move caught the rioters by surprise and was effective in quelling unrest in the countryside.15

Resolution and aftermath
In total, the riots lasted more than 10 days. While contemporary observers differed in their estimates, records indicate that approximately 500 persons were killed and 300 homes destroyed. In total, some 500 people were arrested, but only about 250 could be identified and tried. Following 17 days of trial, six men were sentenced to death and two were eventually executed.16 It was also recorded that 30 junks sailed away for China on 13 May; this was observed as the departure of the unwelcome immigrants.17

In the aftermath of the riots, there were calls for the colonial government to introduce more stringent legislation to better regulate the activities of Chinese secret societies, in order to prevent future riots.18 Editorials in the press also condemned Butterworth for his initially inadequate response, which they regarded as having led to a deterioration of the situation.19 Despite these calls for action, Butterworth remained steadfast in his view that minimal intervention was required, and strongly opposed any new legislation that called for total suppression.20 He did, however, support the formation of the Volunteer Rifle Corps as a standby quasi-military force that could be called upon to put down any future instances of unrest.21 Butterworth also bestowed upon Dunman the Sword-of-Honour, a military award in recognition of Dunman’s service in quelling the riots.22

 

[LordElrond]

The most annoying thing about Afrikaans- they love to talk big

 

[syed putra]

Why dont these niggers go back to where they come from? Cantoland for cantos...all non cantos should fuck back to where they came from.even northern ah tiongs

Malays keep telling cantos the same thing, go back to canto land but cantos too stupid cannot speak malay.

 

[syed putra]

The most annoying thing about Afrikaans- they love to talk big

They are big. Go ask the young girls.

 

[syed putra]

Wonder who started the racial riot of 1964.

Hokkien-Teochew Riots (1854)

The Hokkien-Teochew Riots, also known as the Great Riots of 1854 or the Five Catties of Rice Riots, began on 5 May 1854. The riots stemmed from conflicts between the Hokkien and Teochew communities in Singapore. It was also suggested that secret societies were involved in the riots, especially the Ngee Heng (Ghee Hin) society, which had splintered into Hokkien and Teochew branches, but the extent of their involvement is uncertain.1 The riots lasted for at least 10 days, and led to the death of approximately 500 people and the destruction of some 300 homes. The riots are considered to be one of the most severe outbreaks of violent conflict within the Chinese community in 19th-century Singapore.2

Background
In the early 1850s, conflict between the Hokkien and Teochew communities arose over the control of pepper and gambier plantations, as well as lucrative revenue farms attached to them. The Hokkien merchant community’s increasing dominance in this economic sector was noticed, leading to dissatisfaction among the Teochews.3 This coincided with a period of rice shortages and high rice prices due to reduced imports from Java.4

At the same time, an unusually large number of Chinese immigrants had arrived in Singapore in 1853. Many of these immigrants were members of the Xiao Dao Hui (Short Dagger Sect) that had fled to Singapore after participating in a failed rebellion in Amoy against the Qing imperial government. These political refugees were well armed and considered to be more predisposed to violence than other Chinese immigrants, who mainly came to Singapore seeking employment.5 European observer C. B. Buckley reported that disagreements emerged when the local Hokkien community refused to join in a subscription fund to aid the rebels, of whom a majority were reportedly Teochew. This caused tension between the Hokkien and Teochew communities.6

Outbreak of violence
Violence first erupted on 5 May over a dispute between a Hokkien shopkeeper and a Teochew buyer regarding the price of rice.7 The argument drew the attention of bystanders, who took sides based on their affiliations, thus escalating the situation. This resulted in intense street fighting between the two communities. Shops were smashed and looted amid the chaos.8

Upon the first outburst of violence, Police Superintendent Thomas Dunman called for military reinforcements to supplement the police force, but Governor William Butterworth, who failed to comprehend the gravity of the situation, overruled his initial requests.9 Instead, Butterworth took it upon himself to survey the troubled areas, whereupon he was attacked by a mob.10

When it became evident that the police force was unequal to the task of suppressing the riots, the military as well as contingents of marines from British men-of-war, berthed in the harbour, were summoned to aid in restoring order. European volunteers were also appointed as special constables to help contain the spread of violence.11 Influential Chinese businessmen and community leaders, such as Tan Kim Seng, rendered assistance by mediating with the headmen of the various secret societies.12 An appeal was also made to the Temenggong of Johore for assistance; in response, he sent 200 Malay soldiers as reinforcements.13

Despite these efforts, the rioting continued to spread from the town to the rural areas after the first two days, to areas such as Paya Lebar, Siglap and Bukit Timah where many Chinese resided. Colonial reports suggested that the violence in the countryside was more intense and killings more widespread than they had been in the town area.14 On 10 May, five days after the start of the riots, the colonial authorities implemented a new course of action. Divisions of troops were transported by steamer to the corners of the island, from where they marched towards the town areas. The move caught the rioters by surprise and was effective in quelling unrest in the countryside.15

Resolution and aftermath
In total, the riots lasted more than 10 days. While contemporary observers differed in their estimates, records indicate that approximately 500 persons were killed and 300 homes destroyed. In total, some 500 people were arrested, but only about 250 could be identified and tried. Following 17 days of trial, six men were sentenced to death and two were eventually executed.16 It was also recorded that 30 junks sailed away for China on 13 May; this was observed as the departure of the unwelcome immigrants.17

In the aftermath of the riots, there were calls for the colonial government to introduce more stringent legislation to better regulate the activities of Chinese secret societies, in order to prevent future riots.18 Editorials in the press also condemned Butterworth for his initially inadequate response, which they regarded as having led to a deterioration of the situation.19 Despite these calls for action, Butterworth remained steadfast in his view that minimal intervention was required, and strongly opposed any new legislation that called for total suppression.20 He did, however, support the formation of the Volunteer Rifle Corps as a standby quasi-military force that could be called upon to put down any future instances of unrest.21 Butterworth also bestowed upon Dunman the Sword-of-Honour, a military award in recognition of Dunman’s service in quelling the riots.22

Trouble makers the entire lot. Problem with chinese is their gangster culture.

 

[Hypocrite-The]

Malays keep telling cantos the same thing, go back to canto land but cantos too stupid cannot speak malay.

They are not cantos. They are fuckkas n fuckkas don't have a homeland

 

[syed putra]

They are not cantos. They are fuckkas n fuckkas don't have a homeland

Fuckas are welcome to live in malay land. Malays luv fuckas,

 

[Rogue Trader]

‘No blacks’: Evicted, harassed and targeted in China for their race amid coronavirus

It's a well known fact that blacks are trouble makers in the major cities like Shanghai and Guangzhou. They are synonymous with prostitution, scams, drugs and other petty crimes..

Although American niggers are generally regarded better than African niggers, the Chinese know you can't fight 100000 years of human speciation

 

[Hanslesley73]

‘No blacks’: Evicted, harassed and targeted in China for their race amid coronavirus

In images from video, displaced Africans roam Guangzhou, China, on April 7, unable to find a hotel that will accept them. Eventually, police take some to a station.
(Video taken in Guangzhou)

By Alice SuBeijing Bureau Chief

April 16, 2020 12:09 PM PT

BEIJING —

Elo started cooking as soon as he heard about the boys on the street. The Nigerian trader opened an informal restaurant in Foshan, a manufacturing city half an hour’s train ride from Guangzhou, where dozens of Africans became homeless last week.

Evictions from homes and apartments started when Guangzhou authorities announced that five Nigerians had tested positive for COVID-19. Within days, a campaign was launched to test and track all Africans in the port city.

The sudden and sweeping move was consistent with China’s response to the coronavirus. But it was propelled by a troubling logic that targeted people based on race rather than their contact history. The measure ignited a diplomatic outcry and a crisis on Guangzhou’s streets.

Some of the displaced Africans were longtime residents forced from their homes. Others were businessmen who’d completed 14-day quarantines, but then couldn’t find any hotels that would accept them.

They roamed the streets in the rain and slept under highway overpasses, huddled on the pavement in face masks. They filmed videos of police shouting at them, pressing young men to a wall, and of signs posted in apartment buildings and restaurants — including McDonald’s — saying: “No blacks.”

This, coming from Leongsam who (looks like a handsome, whitish, yellowish, pinkish guy). Wait till what’s happening in USA is followed by the kiwis. ;-p