i will go to LJ today to look see look see. At $20 per day per $1k ( means 2% per day is still slightly cheaper ) . thanks.
What if you lose. How are you going to pay. Listen to bros here, dont borrow
i will go to LJ today to look see look see. At $20 per day per $1k ( means 2% per day is still slightly cheaper ) . thanks.
What if you lose. How are you going to pay. Listen to bros here, dont borrow
Dear Brothers ,
thank you for your kind advices ...
Bro,i will go to LJ today to look see look see. At $20 per day per $1k ( means 2% per day is still slightly cheaper ) . thanks.
Bro,
Not wise to loan for capitial. If you recoup then ok but what if lost again? Will only sink deeper in the red.
Always bet within your means, if funds lost means not your day. Can always come back another day to fight again once you have more funds.
The casino will always be there and they are never scared you come back and play, they only worry if you dun come.
Hope you recoup all your losses and win more more!!!
Bro,
Not wise to loan for capitial. If you recoup then ok but what if lost again? Will only sink deeper in the red.
Always bet within your means, if funds lost means not your day. Can always come back another day to fight again once you have more funds.
The casino will always be there and they are never scared you come back and play, they only worry if you dun come.
Hope you recoup all your losses and win more more!!!
I've heard of the story too. I imagine... some big loser may have jumped ship:(, leaving unclaimed passport....
from time to time, when we gamble, we will face a time when no matter what was it, we kena makan all the time, of course we call this suay!
I just wish to share that we cant escape this scenario because mathematically speaking, when we play 50-50 chance game such as baccarat or roulette red-black etc.., on average of 1000 game cycle, we will be eaten 10 times in a row continuously no matter what system we play. Believe it or not, this can be proven mathematically and nobody can escape this scenario if they are regular gamblers.
.........To prevent our loss from getting deeper and deeper, therefore bankroll management, discipline and self control is very important.
Take for.....................
So as to the unclaimed passports is a myth? NO its not a myth.
Even with perfect bankroll management, perfect discipline etc...., its very difficult to have a system that can overcome the house advantage. Theoretically, a perfect bankroll management, with perfect discipline means that we have a perfect system whereby out of 10 bets, for those that we lose, we place 1 unit and for those that we win, we place more than 1 unit, therefore the nett results is a positive and this is what we commonly say "when losing we must be patient, dont bet excessivly, must know when to stop etc... etc... and when winning we must whack etc etc or some may say when you see chun chun then place your bets etc etc......." and all these are only wishful thoughts which when put into practice will not work because each time when we place our higher stakes bets which we thought may win, the outcome is absolutely unknown even though we may have our very own system which says that the chances of winning next is very high. Because the next result is unknown, therefore on average, the final results of all those higher stakes bets, which we thought will strike, will still be a 50-50 thing , meaning 50% will lose and 50% will win and the nett results will still be 0 and we will still finally lose because of the house advantage.
althugh the house advantage is just a very small advantage, its seems that on the surface we can and should be able to overcome this house advantage with bankroll management or some system play. Initially I also thought that there should be a way out.
The only way we can win is to use martingale but this is out for practical reasons. Now that we know that no one can escape the loses of 10 rounds consequtively in a 1000 game cycle, this means that no matter what system we use, it will still fall prey to this loses and unless we can have a system whereby when we win we put more and when we lose we put less, theres no way we can win against casinos and theres no way we can have this system because we do not know when we are going to lose or win. Therefore it seems to me that theres now way we can win against the casinos for all these reasons.
Even with perfect bankroll management, perfect discipline etc...., its very difficult to have a system that can overcome the house advantage. Theoretically, a perfect bankroll management, with perfect discipline means that we have a perfect system whereby out of 10 bets, for those that we lose, we place 1 unit and for those that we win, we place more than 1 unit, therefore the nett results is a positive and this is what we commonly say "when losing we must be patient, dont bet excessivly, must know when to stop etc... etc... and when winning we must whack etc etc or some may say when you see chun chun then place your bets etc etc......." and all these are only wishful thoughts which when put into practice will not work because each time when we place our higher stakes bets which we thought may win, the outcome is absolutely unknown even though we may have our very own system which says that the chances of winning next is very high. Because the next result is unknown, therefore on average, the final results of all those higher stakes bets, which we thought will strike, will still be a 50-50 thing , meaning 50% will lose and 50% will win and the nett results will still be 0 and we will still finally lose because of the house advantage.
althugh the house advantage is just a very small advantage, its seems that on the surface we can and should be able to overcome this house advantage with bankroll management or some system play. Initially I also thought that there should be a way out.
The only way we can win is to use martingale but this is out for practical reasons. Now that we know that no one can escape the loses of 10 rounds consequtively in a 1000 game cycle, this means that no matter what system we use, it will still fall prey to this loses and unless we can have a system whereby when we win we put more and when we lose we put less, theres no way we can win against casinos and theres no way we can have this system because we do not know when we are going to lose or win. Therefore it seems to me that theres now way we can win against the casinos for all these reasons.
Again with bankroll management & discipline we can minimize our loss and play another day. If my 1st 5 hand i lost, i will reduce 50% of my bet. If i really lose again i will call it a day. Aleast i still have 25% left.
To make you understand, I have to ask you these questions. (i) What is bankroll management. (ii) When you increase your bets, how can you assure that this bet will win or when u reduce your bet, how do you know that it may lose? (iii) if yu lose, you goes home and decide to come again some other days, how does this reduce your loses and increases your chance of winning on the next visit? If u lose and goes home, this is definately very good, no doubt about this but this only delay time, thats all.
The 1000 game cycle includes when one goes home and come back another day to play.
In this collective 1000 games cycle, one will surely sees many things happening and that includes 10 continuous wins and 10 continuous loses. This cycle is similar to a roulette number appearing on average, once in every 37 games and this cycle is very very real as can be seen here whereby eventually, all the roulette numbers appearing will be almost of the same percentage http://goldcup.110mb.com/cgi-bin/individualnumbers.pl
Coming back to bacarat, lets just look at 3 games. In just 3 games, there are 8 possible different patterns :-
ppp
ppB
pBp
pBB
Bpp
BpB
BBp
BBB
So looking at the above 8 patterns, a person playing banker will never like the pattern to be ppp, so likewise a person playing player will not like BBB and some may not like this or that pattern. The above is a 8 games cycle because there are 8 possibilities. Therefore on an average of every 8 games, we are going to face continuously 3 games against and for us. This game cycle include when we go home and come again another day and this have to be included because if we did not include, then we are saying that "if I lose 2 games today and I come again some other days to play the balance 8 games, I have a system whereby I can win more than 5 times out of 10 times" but we know that on average this is not possible.
So no matter how we play, so long as we continue to play, all of us will have to face our OWN game cycle (my game cycle will be different with your game cycle) .
In fact, there are more negative things than just the above but tonight I will just discuss up to here.