Serious Can I Bring PAP To Court?

[ckmpd]

PAP has manipulated SG's Constitution to say that every 5th EP Term is reserved for a Malay candidate.

CCS has said that AGC has advised that the 1st EP was Wee Kim Wee. Based on that the 5th EP Term is from Sep 2017 and that term is reserved for a Malay candidate based on PAP's manipulated Constitution.

But we know that AGC advice is wrong because the 1st EP was OTC.

So if PAP insists on reserving Sep 2017 PE for a Malay candidate, can I bring PAP to court to get a SG Court ruling on:

1) 1st EP was OTC and not WKW
2) Reserved EP for Malay candidate is therefore Sep 2023 and not 2017

Any advice from any legal eagle?

 

[retrenched]

the saf can tekan you to death and you cannot sue becos it is done under "protecting the country".

similarly pap can do what you said and you cannot sue becos it is done under "governing the country".

 

[ckmpd]

the saf can tekan you to death and you cannot sue becos it is done under "protecting the country".

similarly pap can do what you said and you cannot sue becos it is done under "governing the country".

the pap can be lawless and say what they want. But I dont agree with pap. so can I bring pap to Court for saying WKW was the 1st EP? If pap loses that, Sep 2017 will not be reserved for malay candidate

 

[flatearther]

Any advice from any legal eagle?

Yes, you can always try! :p
Many of us here would love to see you gain as much real-life publicity as possible, which might also gain you more fans, both online and in real life! :p

 

[ckmpd]

the saf can tekan you to death and you cannot sue becos it is done under "protecting the country".

similarly pap can do what you said and you cannot sue becos it is done under "governing the country".

Singaporeans cant allow pap to talk rubbish such as WKW was the 1st EP. SG is a law abiding country and if pap talks rubbish, we can turn to the Court to get a judgement

 

[ckmpd]

Yes, you can always try! :p

Are you a lawyer? Under which law can I bring PAP to Court?

 

[flatearther]

Under which law can I bring PAP to Court?

Since you have said the following before (only last month, to be more precise):
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?239834-Future-Of-Singapore&p=2558860&highlight=treason#post2558860

PAP wants Singapore to be a corporation. That's treason. Singaporeans want Singapore to be a country or part of a country, not a corporation

you can try:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason

:p

 

[ckmpd]

Since you have said the following before (only last month, to be more precise):
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?239834-Future-Of-Singapore&p=2558860&highlight=treason#post2558860

you can try:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason

:p

Read post#1

 

[Charlie99]

PAP has manipulated SG's Constitution to say that every 5th EP Term is reserved for a Malay candidate.

CCS has said that AGC has advised that the 1st EP was Wee Kim Wee. Based on that the 5th EP Term is from Sep 2017 and that term is reserved for a Malay candidate based on PAP's manipulated Constitution.

But we know that AGC advice is wrong because the 1st EP was OTC.

So if PAP insists on reserving Sep 2017 PE for a Malay candidate, can I bring PAP to court to get a SG Court ruling on:

1) 1st EP was OTC and not WKW
2) Reserved EP for Malay candidate is therefore Sep 2023 and not 2017

Any advice from any legal eagle?

Please try to take steps to ask the Court to rule on it.
Keep it up.

 

[po2wq]

warao eh! ...

u tink u can beat ah loonz gang in his territory? ...

dey wil tel ya inside polling station is not wifin perimeter of polling station ...

 

[eatshitndie]

the law in sg is on sg regime side. heads they win tails you lose. so simple also don't know. bodoh lah.

 

[mojito]

Of course you can, but can you win?

 

[nayr69sg]

sigh another sinkie.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome.

Wasting your precious life and time.

 

[ckmpd]

Please try to take steps to ask the Court to rule on it.
Keep it up.

Yes, if pap says WKW was 1st elected president, it is worth a challenge. If Court rules OTC as legitimately 1st elected president, next PE 2017 will not be reserved for malays. That's our only hope to defeat LHL's manipulation of the Constitution

 

[ckmpd]

warao eh! ...

u tink u can beat ah loonz gang in his territory? ...

dey wil tel ya inside polling station is not wifin perimeter of polling station ...

let them continue to sound ridiculous. I trust that the present CJ is unlike Chan Sek Keong

 

[ckmpd]

the law in sg is on sg regime side. heads they win tails you lose. so simple also don't know. bodoh lah.

If the Law is clear, let us see whether the Court dares to rule otherwise

 

[ckmpd]

Of course you can, but can you win?

I never know whether I will win until I try.

I am seeking advice whether there are legal grounds to take pap to court for insisting that WKW and not OTC was the 1st EP

 

[ckmpd]

sigh another sinkie.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome.

Wasting your precious life and time.

You are wrong. Not insanity nor wasting of time.

The point is whether WKW or OTC was the 1st EP. My sensing is that legally OTC was 1st EP. The stakes are high. If it is a fact that OTC was 1st EP, how do i challenge pap?

You must have done NS and got yourself castrated by PAP. Even in such a clear case, you darent even stand up for what is true. B.ll less SG guy...sigh

 

[Reddog]

Yes, you can bring the pap to court, but remember all judges are appointed by the pap.

 

[ckmpd]

Yes, you can bring the pap to court, but remember all judges are appointed by the pap.

The US Federal Judges were also nominated by the US President. But they remain fiercely independent and defend the US Constitution stoutly.

Are our Judges less fair than US Federal Judges, are running dogs and defend the PAP rather than SG's Constitution? I suspect that AGC has fumbled and advised LHL wrongly that WKW was the 1st EP, causing LHL to manipulate the Constitution wrong and amend reserved EP for malays to 5th term rather than 4th term.

It is worth for me to consider a legal challenge