• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Breaking News!Pastor Kong Hee And Pastors Arrested And Charge!

"No money was lost, no one gained personally" - CHC Church statement

SINGAPORE - Alluding to the headlines bandied about by some sections of the media - after five of its church members were charged in court on Wednesday - City Harvest Church (CHC) yesterday claimed that it did not "lose" any money, and the individuals involved have not gained any "personal profit".

- http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC120629-0000067/No-money-was-lost
 
.



'No money was lost'





Church claims in statement that money was 'returned in full, with interest'
04:46 AM Jun 29, 2012SINGAPORE - Alluding to the headlines bandied about by some sections of the media - after five of its church members were charged in court on Wednesday - City Harvest Church (CHC) yesterday claimed that it did not "lose" any money, and the individuals involved have not gained any "personal profit".

CHC Executive Pastor and founding member Aries Zulkarnain said in the statement: "It has been suggested that the church has been cheated of S$50 million. This is not accurate."


"The S$24 million, which went to investment bonds, was returned to the church in full, with interest. We didn't lose the S$24 million, nor did we lose 'another S$26.6 million' as alleged," he stated, stressing that the church "did not lose any funds in the relevant transactions, and no personal profit was gained by the individuals concerned".

On Wednesday, prosecutors charged that S$24 million was taken from CHC's coffers supposedly for "investment" in the bonds of two companies, but the money was used to fund the music career of Ms Sun Ho, wife of the mega church's founder Kong Hee.

Another set of criminal breach of trust offences centred on the "round-tripping" of another S$26.6 million from CHC's funds.

Kong, 47, is among the five facing 33 charges in total for allegedly misusing church funds, including criminal breach of trust and falsifying accounts. The other four are: Suspended CHC Board Chairman John Lam Leng Hung, 44; former Board Vice-Chairman Tan Ye Peng, 39; CHC Investment Manager Chew Eng Han, 52; and ex-Finance Manager Sharon Tan Shao Yuen, 36. They will return to court on July 25.

Responding to queries on whether the S$24 million has been recovered, a police spokesperson said on Wednesday that "as the matter is now before the courts, we are not able to provide any information which may potentially be part of the evidence adduced in court". He added: "Generally, in law, the offence of criminal breach of trust of monies is established once there is misappropriation of the monies with the requisite intent, regardless of whether there have or have not been subsequent attempts at restitution by the accused."
Mr Zulkarnain reiterated that the church stands with the members involved. Adding that church activities will continue, he said the Commissioner of Charities (COC) has confirmed Kong and Tan Ye Peng will continue to preach at the church.

Speaking on behalf of the church board, Mr Bobby Chaw, the pastor in charge of missions, said the church was "surprised" that the COC suspended eight of its members without prior notice, given that CHC had been co-operating with the COC.

He revealed that the church had taken steps, over the past two years, to comply with the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports' code of governance. This included replacing half of its board with new members and conducting a full internal audit.

Mr Chaw, however, expressed disappointment with "some of the media's coverage so far, particularly in relation to the COC inquiry".

He said: "In some instances, they seem to have pre-judged us. We will be dealing with this in due course."
 
Closest we have to this case is that of Father Joachim Kang. Given the quatum and scale of the case, Kong Hee should be looking at 7 to 10 yrs. Do you think Sun Ho will stay faithful for such a long time?

---

SINGAPORE: His redemption is now complete. After his release from jail last year, and the end of his home detention scheme last month, Father Joachim Kang now has been restored fully to his duties as a priest.

The decision had been made last week by the head of the Catholic Church in Singapore, Archbishop Nicholas Chia, and revealed to churchgoers on Sunday in the church's fortnightly newsletter, Catholic News.

It carried a statement by the Archbishop to say that Father Kang would be offered a "meaningful ministry" so that his talents could be "used for the good of the Church".

Father Kang had been convicted in 2004 for embezzling S$5.1 million from St Teresa's Church in Kampong Bahru.

Last year, he was put on a home detention scheme, during which time he found work with the law firm of Colin Ng and Partners.

With the lifting of sanctions imposed by the Church, he will now be able to offer public masses, preach and "fulfil the other sacred functions of the priesthood", said Archbishop Chia.

"He has done time under the law and I'm most happy to welcome him home to the Catholic community. As Archbishop and shepherd, I rejoice with him and his family. With the love and support of the church community, I hope that he will embrace the future with confidence," said the Archbishop.

For now, Father Kang has been granted home leave to spend time with his family, especially his aged father.
 
[video=youtube;ZrVv0OwCWt4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrVv0OwCWt4&feature=related[/video]
 
so 50.6m is nothing according to CHC. is the real amount involved even more shocking?
 
So the ones caught as not the only crooks in the church....
All the fucking pastors and whoever running the place are of the same stock.
And none of the 33K followers even so much make any noise.
Brain washing at its very BEST!
 
.




Shameful Reportings and Stupid Charges !!!

If CHC is right, then I can take from my charity's fund (temporarily) for my casino adventure. If win, can put back. "No Harm, No Foul". Right? Aiyah, CHC ...... Amen.
 
my answer is no...it's really a personal choice. no one is forced to do anything against their will

i partially agree on personal choice, but mislead the public to fund own lifestyle is a crime. misleading information is in breached of commercial law.
 
A family and its members all consented to indulge in drugs and incest.....any wrongdoing?

Depends on whether you're a deontological conservative or a consequentialist liberal. Some people think all drugs and incest are evil. Some think it depends on context and consent. Some people can sacrifice their lives for principles. Some prefer to calculate the costs and benefits of everything. To each his own, I guess. :)
 
I just think no one has been mislead, it is highly unlikely we would be surprised that the church members did not see even S$1 going into "other projects". My point is, church is not accountable to public - in fact, i can't be bothered about how they run their houses.

Maybe the CoC can consider a taxation for such organisations that generate surpluses?

Are we all acting holier than thou suddenly?
 
yea CHC is white as snow... i also believe that all the CHC members own a share in that sentosa penthouse :cool:
 
I just think no one has been mislead, it is highly unlikely we would be surprised that the church members did not see even S$1 going into "other projects". My point is, church is not accountable to public - in fact, i can't be bothered about how they run their houses.

Maybe the CoC can consider a taxation for such organisations that generate surpluses?

Are we all acting holier than thou suddenly?

how would u know nobody has been misled? church is a very good example of misleading govt to apply as a charity organisation. the church is supposed to help the poor, but this church only knows how to make profit of an investment and funding own's lifestyle. if an organisation is out there to make a profit, it cannot have a status "charity"
 
so CHC is a profit-generating enterprise, not a church?

City Harvest Pte Ltd

CEO
8pS95.jpg
EAG9J.gif




.

'No money was lost'

"The S$24 million, which went to investment bonds, was returned to the church in full, with interest. We didn't lose the S$24 million, nor did we lose 'another S$26.6 million' as alleged," he stated, stressing that the church "did not lose any funds in the relevant transactions, and no personal profit was gained by the individuals concerned".[/B]
 
how would u know nobody has been misled? church is a very good example of misleading govt to apply as a charity organisation. the church is supposed to help the poor, but this church only knows how to make profit of an investment and funding own's lifestyle. if an organisation is out there to make a profit, it cannot have a status "charity"
shawna, i'm not insinuating they did absolutely no wrong. i'm just saying let's not over-react. why let a 5% error overshadow a 95% good thing the church has done? numbers aside, you don't grow into a 30K strong following teaching the wrong things - so there are things they probably did right. Some people might be going to jail, that's fine with me...but surely people cannot be that naive?
 
shawna, i'm not insinuating they did absolutely no wrong. i'm just saying let's not over-react. why let a 5% error overshadow a 95% good thing the church has done? numbers aside, you don't grow into a 30K strong following teaching the wrong things - so there are things they probably did right. Some people might be going to jail, that's fine with me...but surely people cannot be that naive?

over-react? they did a lot of wrong doings. misleading the public for donation for the love of christ or jesus. what the hell is this!

what about the wife's provocative dancing and scantily attire? is this also teaching the church members to wear like her and gyrating sexily to the church music?
 
Back
Top