Breaking News - GD needs help

[yellowarse]

Serious question, how was scroobal manipulative? I have read some of his posts and hardly found them to be.

He was manipulative, petty and vindictive, frequently resorting to personal attacks. When you agree with him or stroke his ego, he can be very nice. But when you challenge him, he starts to hit below the belt.

Case in point: I was having an argument with him on Op Cold Store. He was a Class 1 gossip; some of his info was spot-on and only accessible to a few; some way off. But his knowledge of political ideology was rudimentary, being brought up in a largely non-ideological environment. He repeatedly confused 'socialism' with 'social activism'. I made fun of his ignorance, and he started stalking me around the forum, calling me names and indulging in petty smears with some of his fan club in tow (kingrant, lockeliberal, etc).

That was when I knew the true person he was: petty, manipulative, vindictive, egotistical. On that I concur with jw5. But he's not Mark Andrew Yeo.

Good riddance, I'd say.

 

[Luvurbaht]

Scroobal....hear this.... I Luvurbaht ,want you(r) back(side). I have no one to argue with now and it is extremely boring and perplexing for me. Please come back.

 

[Leongsam]

He was manipulative, petty and vindictive, frequently resorting to personal attacks. When you agree with him or stroke his ego, he can be very nice. But when you challenge him, he starts to hit below the belt.

Good riddance, I'd say.

I told Escher to stop posting crap and he took offense and scolded my whole family. How is that any better?

 

[yellowarse]

I told Escher to stop posting crap and he took offense and scolded my whole family. How is that any better?

No better. But Escher was just doing his own thing here, spamming threads with his long anti-PAP signatures; he didn't personally attack or bug any of the forumers here. So we left him alone.

 

[eatshitndie]

He was manipulative, petty and vindictive, frequently resorting to personal attacks. When you agree with him or stroke his ego, he can be very nice. But when you challenge him, he starts to hit below the belt.

Case in point: I was having an argument with him on Op Cold Store. He was a Class 1 gossip; some of his info was spot-on and only accessible to a few; some way off. But his knowledge of political ideology was rudimentary, being brought up in a largely non-ideological environment. He repeatedly confused 'socialism' with 'social activism'. I made fun of his ignorance, and he started stalking me around the forum, calling me names and indulging in petty smears with some of his fan club in tow (kingrant, lockeliberal, etc).

That was when I knew the true person he was: petty, manipulative, vindictive, egotistical. On that I concur with jw5. But he's not Mark Andrew Yeo.

Good riddance, I'd say.

the white rose was a victim of point deduction in stealth mode (no open warfare against him) presumably by a gang with substantive powers and i had to donate some but it was not enough. his points got so low that he didn't appear again. and that ms ching (ex of quek) has also disappeared. i did advise her that scroobal's plagiarization of the story on quek and sumiko was cut and pasted without quotations as though he was quek the protagonist himself. that post on sbf led to quek's ex finding the sbf site and responding to scroobal and exposing him as though he was quek. she in turn was flamed and her points deducted presumably by the same gang (of clones). it was a mess.

 

[yellowarse]

the white rose was a victim of point deduction in stealth mode (no open warfare against him) presumably by a gang with substantive powers and i had to donate some but it was not enough. his points got so low that he didn't appear again. and that ms ching (ex of quek) has also disappeared. i did advise her that scroobal's plagiarization of the story on quek and sumiko was cut and pasted without quotations as though he was quek the protagonist himself. that post on sbf led to quek's ex finding the sbf site and responding to scroobal and exposing him as though he was quek. she in turn was flamed and her points deducted presumably by the same gang (of clones). it was a mess.

Spot on. Scroobal was going on about how Quek dropped his pants and mooned during a jam and hop. He'd know, since his younger brother was in school with Quek.

Ms Ching disappeared for good. But The White Rose returned one last time when scroobal was about to make his planned exit. His cover was about to be blown, and he was eyeing a promotion to the top post. Civil service man through and through.

 

[eatshitndie]

Spot on. Scroobal was going on about how Quek dropped his pants and mooned during a jam and hop. He'd know, since his younger brother was in school with Quek.

Ms Ching disappeared for good. But The White Rose returned one last time when scroobal was about to make his planned exit. His cover was about to be blown, and he was eyeing a promotion to the top post. Civil service man through and through.

i'm very wary of you. you seem to have a photographic memory and a mind of a forensics expert. i must cover my tracks from now on. i must say there are sharp tools in the shed.

 

[GoldenDragon]

Goodness how in the world does a real life person Mark Andrew Yeo ever gets identified as Scroobal?

I think he is likely S R Nathan, as only an insider can write such intimate details of the Tales from Istana.

Me think he is Lee Kuan Yew. Let's wait for Takashi to analyse.

 

[GoldenDragon]

I also thought like that coz did not recall Scroobal being like that. Finally read some posts about some feud recently. Scroobal might have taken this forum too seriously I guess - real and reel gets mixed into one. It would be good if everybody takes a step backwards and hopefully can get some semblance of the good old days ...

With the exception of one or two, the rest no problem. Even when POVs differ. They never bring in your family members. Overall, no worries. Life goes on. But if one lives for this forum, trouble.

 

[GoldenDragon]

i must say there are sharp tools in the shed.

Absolutely agree and I am with you on this.

 

[yinyang]

..started stalking me around the forum, calling me names and indulging in petty smears with some of his fan club in tow (kingrant, lockeliberal, etc).
That was when I knew the true person he was: petty, manipulative, vindictive, egotistical. On that I concur with jw5. But he's not Mark Andrew Yeo.

Insightful. And what archive you got there

the white rose was a victim of point deduction in stealth mode (no open warfare against him) presumably by a gang with substantive powers ...as though he was quek the protagonist himself. that post on sbf led to quek's ex finding the sbf site and responding to scroobal and exposing him as though he was quek.

What intrigue. Forum (more than) depicts life. Also seem to recall a bit of your entanglement with Scroo, and your retorts

 

[GoldenDragon]

Insightful. And what archive you got there


What intrigue. Forum (more than) depicts life. Also seem to recall a bit of your entanglement with Scroo, and your retorts

Entanglements and retorts no problem. Win, lose or draw or never mind. Bros here should not bring in the wives, daughters and mothers of others like one did.

 

[takashi]

Me think he is Lee Kuan Yew. Let's wait for Takashi to analyse.

If LKY was the controller of the "scroobal" account, how did he manage to post these two posts:

When it comes to PBM and BBM, Singaporeans generally know that its basically awards for porlumpars. Fair enough that they do things that no one with self-esteem would even con side. So an award is certainly a good recognise these low lives. Not the rest of the awards.

Looks like they left out the brave CISCO and Traffic Police Officer who took on the rioters.

while attending last year's (2014) National Day Parade at SIX something in the evening?

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

The condition of our brother JW5 worries me even when I am asleep. I took him to see Dr Brian Yeo, a psychiatrist who is older brother of Mark Andrew Yeo. I have been praying for him too. Not much progress made.

If scroobal is Mark, and latter can be located and contacted easily, why is JW5 not doing more? There is no need to kpkb here and behave like a mad man. He can solve the problem.

JW5 can challenge Mark to a fight. But bo lumpar. JW5 can get his kakis in this forum to bash up Mark. Again, no balls. Even with a posse of supporters, dare not confront Mark. And I know Mark. He is a limbek guy and our hero here fears Mark?

Mark is on Shanmugam's wanted list. Why JW5 never score points revealing Scroobal's identity to the police continues to trouble me. Or maybe he just howlian to bros here but he himself not sure.

Ok, GD is supposed to be scroobal. So GD is also Mark. When GD disclosed he was from ISD, why never report to ISD? Mark was never in ISD and a case can be made up. Also, GD revealed enough for OSA charges to stand. Why not report Mark to ISD or SPF?

Conclusion is simple. JW5 is not a mental case. Just no balls but wants tai kor reputation and image. The manner in which he attacked Zeddy says it all.

Bros, please help me understsnd this bolumpar kid.

Wah Piangz, this story is damn confusing with so many twist and turns. But its also a good summary .... haha.

Bottom line, read everything on the internet with a big pinch of salt.

Especially this forum. Remember how marjojorn tried to mislead everyone with his straw polls? Wwabbit had to come in to point out his statistical error. In the end look what happened? The actual results were so far off. How can marjojohn survey 1000 people per constituency unless he has civil service resources at his disposal?

Some folks here also have huge egos and the need to look good in front of their followers.

But its all in good fun, bro. All in good clean fun.

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

Zeddy and Charlie99's writings here are good, I will never fail to read them.

People should not anyhow attack. Life is short, live and let live.

 

[ginfreely]

Entanglements and retorts no problem. Win, lose or draw or never mind. Bros here should not bring in the wives, daughters and mothers of others like one did.

If one doesn't respect female in general, why should others respect your wife, daughter and mother? Only hypocrites allow themselves to deride other females but ask for sensitivity towards their wife, daughter and mother.

 

[yellowarse]

i'm very wary of you. you seem to have a photographic memory and a mind of a forensics expert. i must cover my tracks from now on. i must say there are sharp tools in the shed.

Wonder why scroobal kept thinking it was the world's greatest exposé that you are indeed cutebayhunk from Delfi when you've never ever hidden that fact.

 

[sleaguepunter]

why need to expose this expose that?

just take everything posted here with a pinch of salt, no need to get personal.

 

[jw5]

Yes, bring <scroobal> back from his sabbatical!

Who gives a fuck who scroobal is as long as he comes back to liven up the forum.

 

[McDonaldsKid]

He was manipulative, petty and vindictive, frequently resorting to personal attacks. When you agree with him or stroke his ego, he can be very nice. But when you challenge him, he starts to hit below the belt.

Case in point: I was having an argument with him on Op Cold Store. He was a Class 1 gossip; some of his info was spot-on and only accessible to a few; some way off. But his knowledge of political ideology was rudimentary, being brought up in a largely non-ideological environment. He repeatedly confused 'socialism' with 'social activism'. I made fun of his ignorance, and he started stalking me around the forum, calling me names and indulging in petty smears with some of his fan club in tow (kingrant, lockeliberal, etc).

That was when I knew the true person he was: petty, manipulative, vindictive, egotistical. On that I concur with jw5. But he's not Mark Andrew Yeo.

Good riddance, I'd say.

Cheers. I didn't interact with him so was never subjected to what you went through.

I thought he posted plenty of juicy info though. In fact he was one of the reasons why I signed up here initially.