- Joined
- Nov 14, 2008
- Messages
- 9,954
- Points
- 113
Re: Why Only FAP Traitor TCs Allowed to Deal with Kakis While WP Are Not? Familee Law
isn't that leesonable??
isn't that leesonable??
Kaki lang for them it's okay, but for oppo, cannot, double standard.
why only the concern on town councils when we have a husband and wife, including a father/in law running a swf that's worth more than any tc's financesKaki lang for them it's okay, but for oppo, cannot, double standard.
“The [Town Councils] Act by design does not prohibit transactions between the TC and party-related entities or persons… TCs run by MPs from all political parties have at one time or another appointed party supporters or former candidates to provide services to the TCs they run.” – Khaw Boon Wan, 13 May 2013.
Regardless of any or whatever attempts to fix the WP, we will single mindedly ignore all noises and VTO. In 2015 or 2016 or even a last minute 2017. Even voting for Mr. Jover Chew, if and when he decides to contest against a pap candidate.
Sylvia & WP is too eager to use the AGO report to absolve themselves of all responsibility., but EVIDENCE of some transactions that occurred AFTER WP took over the town council have GONE MISSING. This is why AGO's audit took so long and at the end of it even the AGO can’t tell what sort of money is really in the AHPeTC's bank accounts or whether anything has been lost.
AGO Report - "AHPETC also could not provide some documents required during the current audit that concerned transactions taking place AFTER AHPETC had taken over from the previous Town Council. In response to reminders, AHPETC indicated that it could not locate some of the documents and was still looking for others, three months after the request for the documents."