Since , there is a lot of folks here quite scared to shit about BP n diabetic and each expanding their craps , let me give my 2 cents worth ...talking about HbA1c or Haemoglobin A1 c , is a Long term reading of your sugar level say over 3 months sort of an average rather than a instantaneous done by glucometers ,,,this is what our resident doctor @ nayr69sg recommended as the golden rule ? But is it ? Why ? Suppose , your sugar level swings extremely from say 20 at upper and 3 at nights , your average will still be pretty good by HbAc1 done since it’s an average thingy but escapes your terrible terrible health situation ...so an instantaneous glucometer tests done at the right time gives you a far more better readings , like one before your breakfast and others just before your meal and 1 just before you go to sleep and better if 1 done at 3 or 4 AM ... but docs don’t have the time to monitor you like this unless you are hospitalised ...
and suppose if you go to the doctor very dehydrated and your blood pressure reading is rather good , is that any good ? Nope, certainly not because doctors these days do not divthings like what older doctors did .,,how many of you remember the olden days when your family doctor who did house calls ask you to stick your tongue out ? That’s checking your dehydration , simply not done by young doctors anymore ...so older doctors also checked the state of your body condition along with BP and others ...whreas young Doctors totally relies on machine readings
myself have been hospitalised and one thing I observed was the team of Doctors who visit you in the morning almost entirely look at the patient’s record in the computer than the patient himself , a total and over reliance on machine readings and not the state of how the patient is as of that time ...take note @ nayr69sg
Technology has changed medicine.
We still train in clinical skills. But nobody relies on that anymore.
Used to be neurologists would use examination to identify the level of neurological deficit. Which cranial nerve? Then map to which part of brain? Which nucleus?
But nobody relies on that now. They do CT scan. MRI.
And why wouldn't they? The technology is there.
You prefer the doctor not to?
Nowadays the soft touch is wayang. Patient like it of course. But they will still say eh no scan? You not sending me for scan? No blood test?
How many here would trust doctor purely on their superb clinical skills? The days of William Osler over already.
Medicine is dead.
Soon it will be robots doing the job.