• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Any Reward for our 1st Paralympic Medallist?

pia

Alfrescian
Loyal
IF Olympics have, why not Paralympics? She's (and her parents) definitely gone through more challenges to achieve this.

Anyway, hearty congrats to her :smile:
SINGAPORE: When she was five, Laurentia Tan was described as a "vegetable". Born with cerebral palsy, she could not speak, hear, walk or sit, and her parents Anselm and Jannie were advised to admit her into an institution.

They refused.

Today, their 29-year-old daughter is an Oxford Brooks University graduate based in the United Kingdom. She has a career, drives a car and is now a star athlete, after collecting a second bronze medal at the 13th Paralympic Games on Thursday.

On Tuesday, she became Singapore's first Paralympic medallist when she came in third in the individual championship (Grade 1a) event at the Hong Kong Olympic Equestrian Centre in Shatin. On Thursday night, she won bronze again, this time in the individual freestyle test (Grade 1a), posting an average score of 70.167 in the 13-strong field.

Great Britain's Sophie Christiansen (76.166) and Anne Dunham (73.333) took gold and silver, respectively.

"She has been smiling very happily and gave us a big hug straight away (after winning bronze)," said dad Anselm, 59, in a phone interview from Hong Kong on Thursday night.

Equestrian Federation of Singapore president Melanie Chew added: "We're absolutely delighted as this is beyond our expectations! Not only does this raise more awareness for equestrian in Singapore, but it also shows any difficulties can be overcome."

Anselm and his wife Jannie moved their family, including son Ephraim, to the UK when Laurentia was four.

"When she was a year old, the doctor said she was spastic. Back then, they didn't call it cerebral palsy," said Jannie, a government officer.

"We moved to England because the special schools there are very good with the necessary facilities. It was there her deafness was diagnosed. I'm not sure if she could have achieved all this if she had stayed in Singapore then."

Anselm, a businessman, added: "That was Singapore then. Singapore has come a long way in the last 20, 25 years. With the present conditions, she would definitely have been able to achieve this. The level of awareness is much greater now, and we've received so much support, including from the Singapore Sports Council, the Singapore Disability Sports Council and so many kind souls."

Tan began horse riding at London's Diamond Centre Riding for the Disabled when she was five and completed her "A" levels at the Mary Hare Grammar School for the deaf. She pursued equestrian competitively from 2005. In June, she left her job as a mental health worker to train full-time for the Games under coach, Penny Pegrum.

Tan rides with the aid of seat savers and cage stirrups and has teamed up successfully with 20-year-old gelding Harvey, whose official name at the Games is Nothing To Lose.

For her achievement, Tan will earn $25,000 under the Singapore National Paralympic Council's Athlete Achievement Awards scheme.

In other action on Thursday, sailors Jovin Tan and Desiree Lim are in eighth place in the 13-fleet SKUD18 two-person keelboat regatta in Qingdao with 32 nett points after finishing Race 6. - TODAY
 
A

Alu862

Guest
She's not PRC, therefore in the ruling party's eyes, less money.
 

pia

Alfrescian
Loyal
She's not PRC, therefore in the ruling party's eyes, less money.

Sorry, I missed it in the report... yes, a measly $25,000. Compared with $750,000?? For home-bred talent surmounting physical disabilities against instant imports :confused:

Well, at least, I believe she's rich (equestrian not really a sport for heartlanders) and doesn't really need the money. Did it for the country's honour, not for money.
 

monster.cookie

Alfrescian
Loyal
probably trying to keng from NS.

Bro if you refering to her....women no need to keng from NS one lor :biggrin:

But honestly 25,000 bucks is a paltry sum compared to the 750,000 dished out for the regular atheletes. I am certain her sacrifices cannot be less than our imported atheletes. Why such a big disparity?

I think the whole situation is screwed. Kudos to Laurentia~
 

pia

Alfrescian
Loyal
Guess we're not the only ones feeling injustice...
Why so little attention paid to Paralympic bronze?

I REFER to the letter, 'Don't neglect Paralympic games' (my paper, Sept 10).

The media in Singapore has not paid sufficient attention and given enough coverage to the Paralympics.

Ever since the Paralympics started, I have been looking forward to reading the paper every day, hoping that the Singapore team would clinch another medal in Beijing.

However, the news that Singaporean Laurentia Tan had won a bronze medal did not appear on the front page of my paper.

I was disappointed that it did not give as much fanfare to her win as compared to the women paddlers' victory.

I think that the Paralympics are more important than the Olympics.

The Paralympic Games feature disabled people overcoming all odds to compete and do things that normal people do
with ease.

For this reason, I feel that it is neglectful of the paper to not have put the story on its front page.

I hope that more attention will be given to this victory in the Paralympics.

Mr Yong Ming Han
 

pia

Alfrescian
Loyal
from bro teekee's thread...


Quote:
I FELT tremendous pride when I learnt on Wednesday of the glorious success of Laurentia Tan (above) in the equestrian event at the Paralympic Games ('First medal for Singapore'). Incidentally, I had just read on the BBC News website about Britain's cycling triumphs a day before in Beijing.

While both articles were suitably glowing in tributes to their outstanding sportsmen, other notable differences were instructive and thought provoking.

What struck me about the article extolling British feats in the Laoshan Velodrome was that, of the numerous medallists profiled, not a single disability was mentioned.

One could have read most of the article and be hard pressed to identify the sportsmen as Olympians or Paralympians, such was the vivid depiction of their physical prowess and superb technique.

The singular mention of 'Paralympic' was made to suggest the cyclists had arguably surpassed their Olympic countrymen with their spectacular achievements.

The tone of the article on Tan's success was decidedly different. There was no elaboration with regard to her specific performance and what exactly her event demanded, details which would have properly emphasised the skill and finesse required of her.

Instead, the article focused almost primarily on her disability, remarking unnecessarily that her competition category was reserved for those most severely disabled.

While her determination and resolve in overcoming her physical difficulties are outstanding and inspirational, the article failed to highlight that Tan is, above all, a world-class athlete, an equal of weightlifter Tan Howe Liang and our Olympic table-tennis women's team.

Let us shower our Paralympic athletes with the adulation they deserve.

Liang Kaicheng
North Carolina, USA
 

madmansg

Alfrescian
Loyal
laurentia tan is no ordinery singaporeans. She is elite one. Elite are the best keng expert from my past experience. What probably happen is he is born as a guy, then parents secretly change her birth cert to girl and then add one more layer and get her certified as handicapped. THis double protection ensure SAF will never get him.
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
She's not PRC, therefore in the ruling party's eyes, less money.

Will there be 'legions of fans' at the airport to welcome her home?, will Vivien be there?, will the cry baby division 1 minister, be there? Will she be riding on an open bus?:mad:
 

tonychat

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Bro if you refering to her....women no need to keng from NS one lor :biggrin:

But honestly 25,000 bucks is a paltry sum compared to the 750,000 dished out for the regular atheletes. I am certain her sacrifices cannot be less than our imported atheletes. Why such a big disparity?

I think the whole situation is screwed. Kudos to Laurentia~

PAP do not practise equal treatment, that is nothing new, right?
 
A

Alu862

Guest
She sadly is not FT--perhaps if she fakes her birt cert....

Poor Girl in any case. She deserves the million dollar salaries.
 

Lestat

Alfrescian
Loyal
We are all considered as 'units' in the eyes of the gahmen. So when 'units' are deemed flawless, we have a value, which is benched marked by our productivity level. 'Units' which are deemed not perfect, will of course get a lower grading and view.

Hence, the lower amount in the prize money!

Remember, we are all 'units' in pee and pee eyes! :eek:
 

myo539

Alfrescian
Loyal
Well, at least, I believe she's rich (equestrian not really a sport for heartlanders) and doesn't really need the money. Did it for the country's honour, not for money.

For the physically challenged people like madmansg, the government has the uneviable task of looking after them compared to healthy citizens. Their duty is not to make spend millions to make them rich through tough competitive games or contests - but to look after their general physical well-beings and other needs.

That's why the gahment prefer to let NGOs look after them - by giving them grants and other support. These NGOs with their special skills and interest can look after their special needs better - the gahment then priotise and look after the greater number of physically normal citizens.

Yes, they are rewarded for their achievement. It's the glory - such as the triumph of the human spirit to overcome physical disability - rather than the money. They don't bring in the sponsors with their huge advertisement money - but simply show an indication of how much the society or gahment value them.

In poorer countries, such people are often neglected because the gahment of the day is saddled with the mamoth task of having to look after a far greater number of poor but physically normal people.
 

HiGuy69

Alfrescian
Loyal
Eh how come only women play equestrian?

Which part of the game... or horse... attracts only them to the games?
 
Top