-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Angmo FT died after cowardly punch by sinkie!
- Thread starter zeroo
- Start date
A dead chow ang moh is a good ang moh.
The Malay bugger has done Singaporeans proud, even if I don't specifically condone violence. Now chow ang mohs here will think twice before thinking of pushing their weight around here. Singapore is no longer a British colony where we have to kowtow to the white man.
The Malay bugger has done Singaporeans proud, even if I don't specifically condone violence. Now chow ang mohs here will think twice before thinking of pushing their weight around here. Singapore is no longer a British colony where we have to kowtow to the white man.
mati aside.
why need to crowdfund for mati angmo medical bill? FTrash employer don't cover medical insurance?
why need to crowdfund for mati angmo medical bill? FTrash employer don't cover medical insurance?
A good Ang Mo is a dead Ang mo. Enough said. I have donated $100 to his family.
Violence is never a solution.
Dig m&d seldom use use their IQ or control their EQ.
Having them near u is fatal.
Angmo when drunk tend to be rowdy and lau lan.
When 2 of them meet, something bound to happen.
Who really knows the real story of the incident.
Why no prc and angmo? What sentence will the kangaroo court give?
Dig m&d seldom use use their IQ or control their EQ.
Having them near u is fatal.
Angmo when drunk tend to be rowdy and lau lan.
When 2 of them meet, something bound to happen.
Who really knows the real story of the incident.
Why no prc and angmo? What sentence will the kangaroo court give?
yankee already tipsy ,thus light shove or push,he will lost his footing,but with press behind FT,abang be make on stand for murder charge,HOTA coming.
not even yet...two to go..
what was this Malay doing in the pub? I thot Kuran teaches them to stay away from unholy places.
http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2011/05/one-year-after-assault-investigations-still-ongoing/
Assault : April2010
Police acted after two years (2012) (when the online heat gets too hot to handle) in between, two bastard absconded.
https://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/singaporescene/minister-teo-explain-handling-suntec-city-assault-case-092142868.html
What frustrates and disappoints the public, particularly, are two things:
1. The police's silence, even to the victims of the assault, in providing updates on the case.
2. The police's seeming disinterest in pursuing the case so that justice is meted out swiftly, and the victims can have closure to the matter. It took more than a year before the assailants were charged in court, and it has been 22 months since the night of the assault.
The Suntec City attack was a vicious one carried out by three foreigners — New Zealander Robert Stephen Dahlberg, Australian Nathan Robert Miller and Briton Robert James Springall — in the evening of April 2010.
So far, only Miller has been brought to justice, with a three weeks sentence in jail. Dahlberg, rather inexplicably, was allowed to leave Singapore in July last year, just about a month after he was charged in court.
Springall too was apparently allowed to leave Singapore in September last year.
Both men have since absconded, leaving the victims of the attack finding the whole process incredulous.
*******************************************************************************************
On 11 April last year, three friends tried to help a taxi driver who was being heckled and assaulted by a group of four Caucasian men at the taxi stand at Suntec City Tower 5. Instead, the three do-gooders were pounced on by the Caucasian group, with two of them eventually having to be admitted to the hospital for treatment.
The incident took place around midnight that day. The Caucasian men, who were apparently drunk and “running around and swinging their glasses in the air” had approached a taxi. The driver declined to pick them up as he was waiting for another passenger. The group then started to heckle the driver and jumped on the bonnet of the car. Eventually they punched the driver and dragged him out of the car and wanted to drive off.
This seemed to set off a series of events which led to the eventual assault of three passers-by who tried to help the taxi driver. (Read TNP report here and here.)
Mr Laurence Wong, one of the three men, had helped the police by providing as much information as he could, even revisiting the scene of the assault one week later to take pictures on which he marked out where the assault took place, and where the closed-circuit cameras were located. He also managed to obtain pictures and identify three of the four assailants who he suspected, from the formal attire they had on, had been attending an event at Suntec City earlier that night.
He said he handed the information to the police to help them speed up the investigation.
However, one year on, a police spokesman – who described the incident as a “scuffle” – said “investigations are still ongoing”, according to the 11 May 2011 report by The New Paper (TNP).
From what Mr Wong told TNP and The Online Citizen (TOC), the incident, which happened past-midnight on 11 April 2010, seemed more than just a scuffle and a serious assault involving multiple assailants. Mr Paul Louis Liew, one of the three men who tried to help the taxi driver, was “slammed” against the “sharp corner of [a]pillar twice” and was kicked in his head after he had fallen down. “That was when I heard a very loud ‘pop’ sound,” Mr Wong tells TOC. “As if a small balloon burst under pressure… I heard Paul giving out a loud and long sigh seconds after the ‘pop’ sound.” Mr Wong describes how blood was “pouring out from [Mr Liew’s] forehead.”
Ah Heng, one of the three friends, was badly beaten as well. Mr Wong recalls: “Another Caucasian pounced on Ah Heng and kept punching him on his face. Ah Heng fell on the ground and the Caucasian man kept kicking Ah Heng on his face (while he was lying helpless on the floor). I can clearly remember what he said while kicking Ah Heng.” Mr Wong relates the vulgarities the man used each time he laid blows on Ah Heng’s face.
Since the incident, the friends have inquired about the status of the investigation several times with the police. When they asked again in January, they were told that the case has been submitted to the Attorney-General’s Office. When the friends asked if the four culprits were still in Singapore, they said they were told that they are but that “they are allowed to leave the country as and when they want”, according to Mr Wong.
“Just in February, my girlfriend and I saw the Caucasian man (who had assaulted Paul) drunk and disturbing local girls in Clark Quay,” Mr Wong says. “He was with a group of Caucasian men at that time. They were singing and shouting at the top of their voices, while the locals just shy away [from them]. I didn’t want to approach him due to our personal safety.”
“Did they think that nothing will happen to them because the law has not caught up with them yet after more than a year?”
Assault : April2010
Police acted after two years (2012) (when the online heat gets too hot to handle) in between, two bastard absconded.
https://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/singaporescene/minister-teo-explain-handling-suntec-city-assault-case-092142868.html
What frustrates and disappoints the public, particularly, are two things:
1. The police's silence, even to the victims of the assault, in providing updates on the case.
2. The police's seeming disinterest in pursuing the case so that justice is meted out swiftly, and the victims can have closure to the matter. It took more than a year before the assailants were charged in court, and it has been 22 months since the night of the assault.
The Suntec City attack was a vicious one carried out by three foreigners — New Zealander Robert Stephen Dahlberg, Australian Nathan Robert Miller and Briton Robert James Springall — in the evening of April 2010.
So far, only Miller has been brought to justice, with a three weeks sentence in jail. Dahlberg, rather inexplicably, was allowed to leave Singapore in July last year, just about a month after he was charged in court.
Springall too was apparently allowed to leave Singapore in September last year.
Both men have since absconded, leaving the victims of the attack finding the whole process incredulous.
*******************************************************************************************
On 11 April last year, three friends tried to help a taxi driver who was being heckled and assaulted by a group of four Caucasian men at the taxi stand at Suntec City Tower 5. Instead, the three do-gooders were pounced on by the Caucasian group, with two of them eventually having to be admitted to the hospital for treatment.
The incident took place around midnight that day. The Caucasian men, who were apparently drunk and “running around and swinging their glasses in the air” had approached a taxi. The driver declined to pick them up as he was waiting for another passenger. The group then started to heckle the driver and jumped on the bonnet of the car. Eventually they punched the driver and dragged him out of the car and wanted to drive off.
This seemed to set off a series of events which led to the eventual assault of three passers-by who tried to help the taxi driver. (Read TNP report here and here.)
Mr Laurence Wong, one of the three men, had helped the police by providing as much information as he could, even revisiting the scene of the assault one week later to take pictures on which he marked out where the assault took place, and where the closed-circuit cameras were located. He also managed to obtain pictures and identify three of the four assailants who he suspected, from the formal attire they had on, had been attending an event at Suntec City earlier that night.
He said he handed the information to the police to help them speed up the investigation.
However, one year on, a police spokesman – who described the incident as a “scuffle” – said “investigations are still ongoing”, according to the 11 May 2011 report by The New Paper (TNP).
From what Mr Wong told TNP and The Online Citizen (TOC), the incident, which happened past-midnight on 11 April 2010, seemed more than just a scuffle and a serious assault involving multiple assailants. Mr Paul Louis Liew, one of the three men who tried to help the taxi driver, was “slammed” against the “sharp corner of [a]pillar twice” and was kicked in his head after he had fallen down. “That was when I heard a very loud ‘pop’ sound,” Mr Wong tells TOC. “As if a small balloon burst under pressure… I heard Paul giving out a loud and long sigh seconds after the ‘pop’ sound.” Mr Wong describes how blood was “pouring out from [Mr Liew’s] forehead.”
Ah Heng, one of the three friends, was badly beaten as well. Mr Wong recalls: “Another Caucasian pounced on Ah Heng and kept punching him on his face. Ah Heng fell on the ground and the Caucasian man kept kicking Ah Heng on his face (while he was lying helpless on the floor). I can clearly remember what he said while kicking Ah Heng.” Mr Wong relates the vulgarities the man used each time he laid blows on Ah Heng’s face.
Since the incident, the friends have inquired about the status of the investigation several times with the police. When they asked again in January, they were told that the case has been submitted to the Attorney-General’s Office. When the friends asked if the four culprits were still in Singapore, they said they were told that they are but that “they are allowed to leave the country as and when they want”, according to Mr Wong.
“Just in February, my girlfriend and I saw the Caucasian man (who had assaulted Paul) drunk and disturbing local girls in Clark Quay,” Mr Wong says. “He was with a group of Caucasian men at that time. They were singing and shouting at the top of their voices, while the locals just shy away [from them]. I didn’t want to approach him due to our personal safety.”
“Did they think that nothing will happen to them because the law has not caught up with them yet after more than a year?”
for this FT self inflicted death, SPF acted so swiftly, why ?
2 weeks jail for assault?
this is obviously a case of involuntary manslaughter or accidental foulplay.......its not like the ang moh was lieing on the ground and the mat was straddling him wing chun chain punching his face to a pulp.
[video=youtube;v2xr1Gyt5vE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2xr1Gyt5vE[/video]
[video=youtube;v2xr1Gyt5vE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2xr1Gyt5vE[/video]
A stuntman in USS go in to stop a fight and died... Stuntmen usually think they are invincible or else why the nature of job. We already hear lots of assault cases from amdk execs, not to mention an amdk stuntman. So innocent bystander or involved in fight. Can be his friend help him whitewash ma...
You got money to donate to dead angmor, no money to return to limpeh? My 10K leh?
coz the cause of injury was not work related....
really ashamed of the sinkie s behavior..only cowards will punch people from behind...angmohs are still the best...
I congratulated the sinkie for restoring the honor of all sinkies by beating that white trash to death. I am tired of always reading about angmo who beat up sinkies. We are now trying to provide pro bono legal aid for the poor sinkie.
Similar threads
