• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Ang mohs also hate keling shit skins.

What colour is your turban today? :D

I remembered doing that when i was a teen with my malay friend when a Sikh walked past us, He heard it. Stop. Scream at us and almost beat us up.. Few yrs down the road, The daughter fall in love with me. :)
 
I remembered doing that when i was a teen with my malay friend when a Sikh walked past us, He heard it. Stop. Scream at us and almost beat us up.. Few yrs down the road, The daughter fall in love with me. :)

Turban singh now almost extinct except a few oldies. Now almost all modern singhs. The kaurs are quite fair and shapely at teenages I must said. After 30s, I can only say depend on how they take care. ;)
 
I think the ang mohs hate the chinks equally as much.

Fucking Chink imitating a Jamaican going at keilings again. Fuck bigot. Size Brain of White, Brown, Yellow, Black (-----), Brain size of Bigots like Rastar-i (-).. Cock sucker going at it again. Start using water to clean your ars mate, Cos you keep on scratching your arshole and putting it in your mouth.. Thats why you only talk shit.


Go back and read up on the thread nigger. It's a keling shit skin that started it complaining of racism. It's racism to speak facts about how you shit skins stink!

Btw what race are you now? It's sad that you won't even admit your own race online.
 
There was a spate of murders happened in Melbourne last year...tink all victims were Indians! Killer/s still at large...
 
In a way western countries are helping asian countries spread their inferior genes wider. Without the west asians will cannibalize each other because they got nothing else to feed their rabbit like population growth. US is the biggest supplier of rice/corn and soya beans. How come? To feed asia. Also when a natural disaster strikes in asia, who donates and help the most? The west..not china,india, rag heads in the mid east. The tsunami that hit indonesia a few years ago, helped came from ang mo and not from the so called muslim rag head brothers from the middle east. North Korea gets most of its food aid from the west and not from its good fuck friend china. I am sure got alot more example of how the west aid asia more than vice versa.

That is certainly not true. Just look at the donations for the Sichuan earthquake. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactions_to_the_2008_Sichuan_earthquake

The reason why Asian countries cannot donate as much as the West is because most of them are poor countries with problems feeding their own populations. You are also forgetting that most Asians do not believe in invading other countries to plunder their resources.
 
I think the ang mohs hate the chinks equally as much.

Fucking Chink imitating a Jamaican going at keilings again. Fuck bigot. Size Brain of White, Brown, Yellow, Black (-----), Brain size of Bigots like Rastar-i (-).. Cock sucker going at it again. Start using water to clean your ars mate, Cos you keep on scratching your arshole and putting it in your mouth.. Thats why you only talk shit.

this coming from a Mat trying to speak like an ang mor aussie?
 
That is certainly not true. Just look at the donations for the Sichuan earthquake. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactions_to_the_2008_Sichuan_earthquake

The reason why Asian countries cannot donate as much as the West is because most of them are poor countries with problems feeding their own populations. You are also forgetting that most Asians do not believe in invading other countries to plunder their resources.

That is nothing compared to what the US did to rebuild europe after WW2. Its not the amount of money, its the willingness to assist. Why should the rich help the poor..Are they obligated to do so?

Asians are poor thats why they dont plunder other countries resources they only do it to another poorer nation. Than how do you explained what Japan did during ww2.

But to a certain extent you are right to say that. Because asian countries prefer to plunder and kill their own people. China/Tibet/Thailand/Indonesia/Korea......

Asian countries are not entirely poor. Most are rich in natural resources. They made themselves poor by plundering their own. The West is not obligated to help them. Even sinkapore

which is a rich ASIAN cuntry only gives lip service to humanitarian work.
 
Last edited:
That is nothing compared to what the US did to rebuild europe after WW2. Its not the amount of money, its the willingness to assist. Why should the rich help the poor..Are they obligated to do so?

I'm usually on the US' side but I'm not about going to claim that they're magnaminous philantrophists. Huge amounts were spent helping rebuild western Europe and Japan fast after WW2 were mostly for their own political and military interests to keep those satellites democratic, stable and progressive. USSR had already grabbed eastern Europe and PRC at that time was an ally of USSR. US must not only balance the power equation but also keep the economies and democracies up ahead in the Cold War race to ideological and military supremacy.

In short, had US saved the money, western Europeans and Japanese might be mired in poverty for decades. That would risk discontent, instability and open up many opportunities for communist insurgencies.
 
I'm usually on the US' side but I'm not about going to claim that they're magnaminous philantrophists. Huge amounts were spent helping rebuild western Europe and Japan fast after WW2 were mostly for their own political and military interests to keep those satellites democratic, stable and progressive. USSR had already grabbed eastern Europe and PRC at that time was an ally of USSR. US must not only balance the power equation but also keep the economies and democracies up ahead in the Cold War race to ideological and military supremacy.

In short, had US saved the money, western Europeans and Japanese might be mired in poverty for decades. That would risk discontent, instability and open up many opportunities for communist insurgencies.

The US had to. Plus they were reluctant in the first place to enter the war. Till Pearl Harbour. The cost of not rebuilding europe was far more greater.
 
Last edited:
That is nothing compared to what the US did to rebuild europe after WW2. Its not the amount of money, its the willingness to assist. Why should the rich help the poor..Are they obligated to do so?

Asians are poor thats why they dont plunder other countries resources they only do it to another poorer nation. Than how do you explained what Japan did during ww2.

But to a certain extent you are right to say that. Because asian countries prefer to plunder and kill their own people. China/Tibet/Thailand/Indonesia/Korea......

Asian countries are not entirely poor. Most are rich in natural resources. They made themselves poor by plundering their own. The West is not obligated to help them. Even sinkapore

which is a rich ASIAN cuntry only gives lip service to humanitarian work.

Asians do not really have the concept of nationalism until the West came to them. Same for Japan, which is regarded as a Western nation. If I am not wrong, I think China during its peak in the Han/Tang dynasty was quite eager to help neighbouring countries as long as they proclaim China as the big brother, same as what the US is doing now. There is no such thing as aid with no strings attached in politics. You will be asked to return some favours sometime in the future.

Singapore is a rich country? Maybe only for the elites. Most of the peasants live in very expensive slum-like pigeonholes which they need a lifetime to pay for and don't exactly belong to them.
 
Last edited:
Asians do not really have the concept of nationalism until the West came to them. Same for Japan, which is regarded as a Western nation. If I am not wrong, I think China during its peak in the Han/Tang dynasty was quite eager to help neighbouring countries as long as they proclaim China as the big brother, same as what the US is doing now. There is no such thing as aid with no strings attached in politics. You will be asked to return some favours sometime in the future.

Singapore is a rich country? Maybe only for the elites. Most of the peasants live in very expensive slum-like pigeonholes which they need a lifetime to pay for and don't exactly belong to them.

Nationalism only came alive after the countries were freed from the western colonialism. Actually some countries were already nationalistic in nature or perhaps a kingdom. Although a monarchy isn't considered nationalistic but some citizens of kingdoms are very loyal to them.
 
Back
Top