• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

An Apology to All Taiwan People

nightsafari

Alfrescian
Loyal
So sad the hate is not enough. If not cantoland will be independent.
sorry this one I can't agree. no need hate can still be independent.

to hate is to draw oneself closer to the hated. I think that's counter productive no? Should just declare independence and refuse to co-operate with tiongs. no need to fight. just refuse service.
 

nightsafari

Alfrescian
Loyal
You are right. The Chinese are hopeless. Must be inferior genes.
actually hor... I was just thinking about this. I feel that it's a case of differences in how different cultures define their in and out groups.

The westerners that keep progressing have a more flexible view of in group definition. The East and South Asians don't.
 

nightsafari

Alfrescian
Loyal
"Errrr...."
found it!

1586824911466.png


:thumbsup: this is a tribute to you! :thumbsup:
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
sorry this one I can't agree. no need hate can still be independent.

to hate is to draw oneself closer to the hated. I think that's counter productive no? Should just declare independence and refuse to co-operate with tiongs. no need to fight. just refuse service.
Hate if used correctly can create determination to achieve an objective. I dont advocate hate for hate sake though alot of assholes in this forum deserve to be executed for being assholes. After objectives has been met. Reconciliation can come later. I realized that for cantoland to gain independence. The foreigners need to be driven out. Those that don't play ball should also be gotten rid of. This is to ensure all divisions are eliminated and the objective is met. For ah tiong land. There is no way to win independence by being nice bcos the chicoms, the northerners n their running dogs the fuckeins will play dirty n b more cruel than the nips n krauts in WW2. Look at the killing rates by Mao n the CCP...one does not win a war by being nice. N the biggest losers to cantoland independence will be the chicoms n northerners n fuckeins. Rest assured they will eliminate all cantos to ensure it will not happen
 

hofmann

Alfrescian
Loyal
actually hor... I was just thinking about this. I feel that it's a case of differences in how different cultures define their in and out groups.

The westerners that keep progressing have a more flexible view of in group definition. The East and South Asians don't.

Just throwing out some random thoughts on this, but I think much of modern Western progress can be traced to 1789 when democracy finally overthrew the monarchy.

The Asians were never emancipated similarly and have always been oppressed by some form of monarchy/dictatorship under the guise of cohesion/unity.

Asians never had a chance to think and act for themselves and thus never carried the burden of self responsibility. All gain and all pain were always attributed to a higher authority, never to themselves.
 

nightsafari

Alfrescian
Loyal
Hate if used correctly can create determination to achieve an objective. I dont advocate hate for hate sake though alot of assholes in this forum deserve to be executed for being assholes.
I agree with the above. Hate can in selective instances work, but I see no solution here for it.

After objectives has been met. Reconciliation can come later. I realized that for cantoland to gain independence. The foreigners need to be driven out. Those that don't play ball should also be gotten rid of. This is to ensure all divisions are eliminated and the objective is met. For ah tiong land. There is no way to win independence by being nice bcos the chicoms, the northerners n their running dogs the fuckeins will play dirty n b more cruel than the nips n krauts in WW2. Look at the killing rates by Mao n the CCP...one does not win a war by being nice. N the biggest losers to cantoland independence will be the chicoms n northerners n fuckeins. Rest assured they will eliminate all cantos to ensure it will not happen
if you go aggressive with Mao and his communist cadre do you think you will win? I feel that a group of people who wish to go their own way should be given a chance to as in HK's case, but I feel that going head on will win HK nothing.
 

nightsafari

Alfrescian
Loyal
Just throwing out some random thoughts on this, but I think much of modern Western progress can be traced to 1789 when democracy finally overthrew the monarchy.

The Asians were never emancipated similarly and have always been oppressed by some form of monarchy/dictatorship under the guise of cohesion/unity.

Asians never had a chance to think and act for themselves and thus never carried the burden of self responsibility. All gain and all pain were always attributed to a higher authority, never to themselves.
@tanwahtiu, this is part of my answer.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Come on... UK still keep their monarchy but goes round the world killing other countries monarchy system.

If democracy was their strenght they shd kill their monarchy too.

Fake democracy and doesn't exist. Democrazy is just like bats, bats are blind creatures, let them fly at night... sleep at day time...

Your turn... say...

@tanwahtiu, this is part of my answer.
 
Last edited:

nightsafari

Alfrescian
Loyal
Just throwing out some random thoughts on this, but I think much of modern Western progress can be traced to 1789 when democracy finally overthrew the monarchy.

The Asians were never emancipated similarly and have always been oppressed by some form of monarchy/dictatorship under the guise of cohesion/unity.

Asians never had a chance to think and act for themselves and thus never carried the burden of self responsibility. All gain and all pain were always attributed to a higher authority, never to themselves.
your thoughts are always welcome. :thumbsup:

just as an aside. The British insist on claiming their emancipation from autocracy earlier, but I disagree with them. Their version was a fluke. :laugh:

I've spent a good portion of my life wondering where and how China in it's zenith for the 1st millennium A.D. ended up being sick man of the East and us accordingly being raised in a British colony a good few latitudes away from home.

see my reply on page 2 of this thread to tanwahtiu
 

nightsafari

Alfrescian
Loyal
Come on... UK still keep their monarchy but goes round the world killing other countries monarchy system.

If democracy was their strenght they shd kill their monarchy too.

Fake democracy and doesn't exist. Democrazy is just like bats, bats are blind creatures, let them fly at night... sleep at day time...

Your trun... say...
That's why I said Britishers insist it was earlier but I disagree. Truth is that it wasn't. Cromwell is who they cite. They never did what hofmann said. That's why they're going down the tubes now. They will follow sick man of the West. Only thing keeping them up is the number of PLPs who go there spend money. Last time 8 SGD 1 GBP now what is it?
 

hofmann

Alfrescian
Loyal
your thoughts are always welcome. :thumbsup:

just as an aside. The British insist on claiming their emancipation from autocracy earlier, but I disagree with them. Their version was a fluke. :laugh:

I've spent a good portion of my life wondering where and how China in it's zenith for the 1st millennium A.D. ended up being sick man of the East and us accordingly being raised in a British colony a good few latitudes away from home.

see my reply on page 2 of this thread to tanwahtiu

Therein lies the weakness of a system dependent on the existence of the philosopher-king. His existence is an anomaly and not the norm. Such golden ages will fade with the passing of the p-k. Systems created by the p-ks turn corrupt with their demise. It is inevitable.

We can count on maybe 2 hands the number of p-ks that have existed throughout recorded history. And history records the crumbling of such empires with their passing.

True democracy divests the power of the p-k to the people. Opponents will call it tyranny of the majority, proponents see it as wisdom of the crowd.

"The wisdom of the prophets are written on the subway walls."
 

nightsafari

Alfrescian
Loyal
Therein lies the weakness of a system dependent on the existence of the philosopher-king. His existence is an anomaly and not the norm. Such golden ages will fade with the passing of the p-k. Systems created by the p-ks turn corrupt with their demise. It is inevitable.

We can count on maybe 2 hands the number of p-ks that have existed throughout recorded history. And history records the crumbling of such empires with their passing.

True democracy divests the power of the p-k to the people. Opponents will call it tyranny of the majority, proponents see it as wisdom of the crowd.

"The wisdom of the prophets are written on the subway walls."
amazing that his systems are still in place to this day and he's still venerated in East Asian countries viz Confucius institutes.
 
Top