Having balls is one thing, depending on a clown that you're impressed with that spouts profanities and godly issues etc from his rectum that has no relation to politics, with the mistaken belief that that amounts to freedom of speech amounts to just that - all balls without any substance! i've already stated either the ballot box or the extreme of an arab spring and you go on betting on the one clown (ok make it two, including you) and you really think it will make a change? many of us don't like being screwed by the pappies (twice over and then some) but taking the example of a gold-digger is being simplistic to say the least, unless there's a relation with amos and a twat. i'lll work hard but through the ballot box, thanks.
Being a political threat and a dissent against the PAP does not need to be vulgar. Vulgarity is not a pre-requisite for being a political threat and dissent. Having brains and balls is. It is Amos's choice in being vulgar. You can be a dissent without being vulgar.
Please take into account that a
massive boycott and
including boycotting their self-serving policies has to be done hand in hand in order to break the PAP. One person cannot do much.
If nobody play the PAP game, what the PAP can do? When a person go to vote, the person is playing the PAP game and it is the game that they rigged to their advantage.
i sincerely hope that he does, and you still want to bank on an uneducated idiot that you think can be comparable to csm / tcb / csj / pt etc? i'm glad that he's granted asylum and free from the pappies, but apart from that - what effective political threat or credibility can he amount to? you have your views but i'll bank on those that i've mentioned - through the ballot box. good luck.
Getting a degree or any higher education is not a pre-requisite for being a political threat, balls and brain is. Being educated does not mean that the educated person has a brain, it is often quite the opposite.
Well, it is your choice if you want to play the PAP ballot box game. You are the one who is going to be screwed in the end. Not me.
I am using Amos Yee as an example of what is needed to go against the PAP. ( brains, balls and creativity) If Amos isn't a threat of the PAP, why PAP need to go on a drastic measure to jail him and give trouble to him till he has to seek asylum. A young teenager seeking asylum in USA because of PAP.
Playing the PAP ballot game does not need any balls, brains and creativity.
By the way, denying to admit one has no balls and saying what Amos did is useless is actually quite the same thing at times, especially in this forum.