Can knowledgeable bros here help me out on these few queries.
1. How did CPIB know so much details?
2. How come CPIB never coach Cecilia what to say if she is STAR witness.
3. How come Cecilia's statements keep changing? She must have been coached, no one
in her right mind change statements like changing clothes like that.
4. If she had sex with Gay and asks about the paternity of her child, why she blakang pusing
now? It seems like CPIB is helping Gay. If this is so, then someone higher up is pulling the strings. Who?
5. If Gay has no fighting chance, he will not dare to stand trial, right? He not stupid.
6. All those SMSs and hotel and car park show they've a relationship so why now Cecilia says there's no
relationship? Someone must be teaching her to say that Gay forced her to BJ, but if no relationship, why
would Gay force her to BJ him? So many fishes out there, right?
7. She said Gay does not want to discuss about the NCB project and to leave it to his team. Is this why
she's upset? Like, for example, she put so much effort to seduce him and he machiam just want sex but
no trade, surely she feel short-changed, right?
8. I think there is no case to answer here, just alot of little ghosts messing with Gay and Cecilia.
9. Both have sex. It's a consensual sex, so both side also get gratification. But work is work, fun is fun, right?
10. Prosecution must prove that there is an arrangement to trade sex with contract. So far, no SMSs or emails
or phone conversations or tape conversations to show that. Like that CPIB still dare to bring the case to court?
CPIB must be too fucking free.
PS: I've been involved with such women like Cecilia before. Using feminine charms and all that. I also kanna sabo
by Cecilia type of women. Case very similar. Of course men in power wants to makan, which is no good, but it
does not mean that there is corruption. As long as both can keep business and private affairs separate, where
is the case?
No case, bros. Just someone high up poking here and there. Too bad. Full of politics.
I support Gay, because I understand the procurement process of CNB is not influenced by Gay. The team usually
decides, unless the Prosecution can bring as witnesses from the team that Gay did influence their decision of who
to award.
CPIB is blur-sotong. If I'm Tan Chee Meng, I'll bring as witnesses the team members and ask them if Gay as
superior got influence them or not. The case very simple one. If team members say no, then must acquit immediately.
This case is so boliao, talking about BJs and sex. But what has that to do with corruption? As long as the team members
say they evaluate the project and Gay did not influence, then very clear already what. So much beat around the bush
and yet the main point is not there. Chey! Wasting taxpayers money. Better wake up.
Let Cecilia and Gay lead their own private lives. So busybodies for what, so many little ghosts out to poke here poke there.
