Airbus A320 faults exposed by Hudson Landing

[Papsmearer]

Lots of ego and big talks, but you never read the passengers interview. Their windows were leaking water at once the plane crashed. Exits not even opened yet.

Your Big Mouth?

Pilots admitted that they did not flip the DITCH SWITCH to seal off ventilations & other holes on the plane before they ditched. This is additional reason. But windows are not supposed to leak that way.

Wake up!

U mean after a plane ditch in water at over 100 miles plus an hour, the windows are not supposed to leak? U are fucking stupid. The fact that EVERYONE survived is a testament to the good design of the plane as well as the skill of the pilot. Accept that and move on with your pathetic life.

 

[diversifyx2]

<EMBED src=http://www.liveleak.com/e/17a_1232335752 width=450 height=370 type=application/x-shockwave-flash wmode="transparent">
<EMBED src=http://www.liveleak.com/e/113_1232468020 width=450 height=370 type=application/x-shockwave-flash wmode="transparent"></EMBED>

 

[Mohd_Ah_LEE]

U mean after a plane ditch in water at over 100 miles plus an hour, the windows are not supposed to leak? U are fucking stupid. The fact that EVERYONE survived is a testament to the good design of the plane as well as the skill of the pilot. Accept that and move on with your pathetic life.

Commercial passenger planes' windows are double or triple layers and made to withstand strong pressure differences and not break nor leak. If they broke in flight will seriously decompress the pressurized cabin and people will be sucked out of the window as well as unable to breath in the thin air of high altitude. You know or not?

 

[pia]

Commercial passenger planes' windows are double or triple layers and made to withstand strong pressure differences and not break nor leak. If they broke in flight will seriously decompress the pressurized cabin and people will be sucked out of the window as well as unable to breath in the thin air of high altitude. You know or not?

True, but Papsmearer's point is, although not diplomatic, after crashing, the structural integrity of the plane is compromised, so surely you would expect some if not all the windows to give way.

 

[Papsmearer]

Commercial passenger planes' windows are double or triple layers and made to withstand strong pressure differences and not break nor leak. If they broke in flight will seriously decompress the pressurized cabin and people will be sucked out of the window as well as unable to breath in the thin air of high altitude. You know or not?

I know how they are made, and we are not talking about breaking in flight, stupid. if it broke in flight, like the Dehavilland Comet, than it can be rightly called a design flaw. This is a major crash landing leading to the total lost of the plane. When u impact like that, there will be structural failure. i.e. fuselage frames and spars buckling, skin of the plane peeling, deformed, floor of the plane being push out, debris striking the outside of the plane ,etc. Passenger window leaking is the least of your problems. U expect the windows to be leak proof when all the metal frame around them is being pushed and pummeled? U are a retard, just like the thread starter.

 

[Papsmearer]

True, but Papsmearer's point is, although not diplomatic, after crashing, the structural integrity of the plane is compromised, so surely you would expect some if not all the windows to give way.

Truly, these posters are a sad reflection on the state of SIngapore Intelligence. These morons expect every single part of the plane to work perfectly in isolation after the crash, ignoring the obvious fact that everyone survived!! Mostly due to pilot skill, but surely, the design of the aircraft must also have contributed. If you have a shit aircraft, the best pilot in the world would not be able to save all the passengers.