1. Not wearing FLAK JACKET, therefore very vulnerable to gunfire in a firefight when terrorists shoot first from behind good cover.
2. Marksmanship skills of NS men highly questionable means high collateral damage in a firefight with innocent casualties to be expected.
3. Steel jacketed ammo not hollow points used by SAF means bullet richocheting against hard surfaces resulting in wrong targets getting hit.
Prepared for terrorist attacks - before or after?
I am assuming you have never done NS. To my knowledge, all SAF ammo is copper jacketed, not steel jacketed. The use of SAR-21 in a building like the Changi airport is not the fear of richocet. Because the SAR-21 uses the 5.56mm NATO, its a more powerful cartridge then the HK MP5 9mm. If one of these idiots fired a round from a SAR-21 at close range, it will penetrate the person's body and hit the nearest wall behind him and penetrate that wall too, potentially killing or injuring anyone in that room. That is why when you look at other country's security patrolling airports, they never use a 5.56mm weapon. Except if you are in Russia where life is cheap and AK-47s are acceptable patrol weapons.
If not for the 5.56 mm ammunition, then what other calibre?
If not for the 5.56 mm ammunition, then what other calibre?
Normally 9mm hollow point is the standard. Most HRT and SWAT use 9mm weapons. U don't want collateral damage if the round penetrates the target and hits people behind him.
Don't worry, our PM was the one who spearheaded the rescue of people trapped in cable cars. With that experience, he can handle all kinds of terrorist threats.
Yes indeed!
A very macho looking soldier boy. Reminds me of Vic Morrow in the series "Combat". Singapore is in good hands.
Normally 9mm hollow point is the standard. Most HRT and SWAT use 9mm weapons. U don't want collateral damage if the round penetrates the target and hits people behind him.
Pardon my ignorance, but 9mm is bigger and powerful than 5.56mm, which should do more collateral damage?
What is the difference between the damage on a human body hit by a 5.56 and a 9mm?
Thank you.
Its not really the same. You are comparing a rifle round with a handgun round. The muzzle velocity on a 5.56mm round is almost 4 times that of a 9mm round. Therefore, even though the 9mm calibre is heavier then the 5.56mm, the 5.56mm is a much more powerful round due to the larger cartridge (more propellant powder) and hence at close range, it will just go clean through a body. At longer ranges, the 5.56mm will tumble during flight and will end up tumbling around the human body and causing a lot of damage to it. In many ways, getting shot at close range with a 5.56mm is less damaging then at say 200m. But the problem is that the round is so powerful, it will penetrate the body and hit whoever is behind. For the 9mm, if its hollow point, it will just mushroom up when it hits the body and breaks into fragments. If its not, it might still remain in the body.
I feel very safe in Singapore. I also know that my CPF is safe too and when I look at my statement, I feel so rich.
Yes indeed!
hahaha...double confirmed an empty vessel...Normally 9mm hollow point is the standard. Most HRT and SWAT use 9mm weapons. U don't want collateral damage if the round penetrates the target and hits people behind him.