A Singaporean's guide to living in Thailand

[Ramseth]

I from Thailand I oversea no naughty cos nothing can compare to Thailand.

Thailand is best place to be naughty or horny. Go coffeeshop or restaurant to eat, chat up an assistant or waitress also can bring back hotel.

 

[Muthukali]

Thailand is best place to be naughty or horny. Go coffeeshop or restaurant to eat, chat up an assistant or waitress also can bring back hotel.

Nothing is impossible, is only how much, chai mai?

 

[drifter]

Thailand is best place to be naughty or horny. Go coffeeshop or restaurant to eat, chat up an assistant or waitress also can bring back hotel.

if thailand is just a place to be naughty or horny ...joetys and the rest of the brothers here will not do biz there

 

[Ramseth]

Nothing is impossible, is only how much, chai mai?

I never ask any lady, how much? The lady I love is always priceless. The moment we have together is always priceless, and unforrgettable.

 

[Ramseth]

if thailand is just a place to be naughty or horny ...joetys and the rest of the brothers here will not do biz there

お兄さん、your English problem again. I said it's best place, not only place. Anyway, just my experience and opinion. Nobody has to agree if you disagree.

 

[chonburifc]

Re: joetys , chonburific , KYP , ...ect those who llive in thai please come in

Sawats dee,

For biz in tourist destinations, need to know the target market. Generally, tourists (locals or foreigners) are prepare to pay a higher price for things/service since they knew it is a tourist place. A lot of biz comes from referrals.

I am not in the bar and massage biz but I do know a lot of retirees farang owners and my observations is too many headaches and just not worth it. Personally, I will go into property or F/B related biz in Sin City.

 

[Froggy]

Re: joetys , chonburific , KYP , ...ect those who llive in thai please come in

Miss Zhou has very skillful and strong hands. Her technique is very special, fishy time I Kenna this. Very lucky. Now going to fall asleep.

She is pretty and cute looking too.

 

[chonburifc]

if thailand is just a place to be naughty or horny ...joetys and the rest of the brothers here will not do biz there

Yes, This is one of the reason why many biz owner failed. Wrong reason to start a biz. Eg. Horny farangs opening bars with gf.

 

[chonburifc]

Hehehe.Think I saw Xiao Long Pao in one of the post. Unfortunately cannot Da Pao.

 

[Ramseth]

Actually, I don't really like bao. My favorites are still maikai and siumai for dimsum. Fanchoy and harkow good also, but a bit hard to find nowadays unless going to a full dimsum restaurant. Ho Kee was my good neighborhood dimsum franchise stall offering a good range for choice. But it moved away to don't know where after the upgrading of hawker centre two years ago. Tiong Bahru chwee kway had a franchise stall here but moved away too. Guess LTB may be right, upgrading destroys foods!

 

[drifter]

お兄さん、your English problem again. I said it's best place, not only place. Anyway, just my experience and opinion. Nobody has to agree if you disagree.

paiseh my mistake ....dont laugh at my angmo hor

 

[Khun Ying Pojaman]

Re-read. I've already said it's not necessarily about adventuring, it can also be about too frequent routine and saving time. If you're about personal preference, I have no objection. I've also said, safety of lady friends or relatives must be priority. In those cases, I won't consider it a bother if I was asked to receive them. In fact, I'd insist. But if a man, unless sick or handicapped, asked that, I'd think he should get indpendent and adventurous himself.

It's your insinuation that I take offence. You're implying that anyone who wants to be received on arrival is not man enough, unless he is sick or handicapped.

Your first reply was:

Packing luggage is a hassle, yes. But I've never arranged for anyone to send me on receive me on arrival. It's part of the thrill and experience, figuring out ways solo adventurously. But of course, if I was traveling with female companions, I'd arrange for people to recieve and escort us, or if not, go for travel agency.

Your reasoning was simple at first. It's about being adventurous. In your second reply, your realized I was referring to "to and fro the same spots" so that there was nothing adventurous going through the same routine, you turned the issue into one of "ease and familarity". You could have just admitted that you misinterpreted the context but you chose not to. Not surprising since this is a Ramseth trademark.

You didn't stop to think why someone who lives alone in two countries all by himself digging wells and manoeuvring between two different legal systems in areas of immigration laws, property ownerships and corporate governance would prefer to have another person receive him on arrival. You claimed to have no objection if it was a personal preference. Yet you capped your attack with insinuation like this:

In fact, I'd insist. But if a man, unless sick or handicapped, asked that, I'd think he should get indpendent and adventurous himself.

It's a thinly disguised personal attack which, at the same time, seeks to promote yourself as some super macho man and protector of women. I respect your rights to constantly promote yourself as some super Casanova in this forum, but not at my expense, please.

 

[Ramseth]

It's your insinuation that I take offence. You're implying that anyone who wants to be received on arrival is not man enough, unless he is sick or handicapped.

That's correct. Not only insinuation but assertion. But I did qualify, if that's your preference and your receptionist has no objection, who I am I say anything else?

In forum discussion, don't take it like you must convince the whole forum, take as voicing your opinion for discussion.

 

[Khun Ying Pojaman]

That's correct. Not only insinuation but assertion. But I did qualify, if that's your preference and your receptionist has no objection, who I am I say anything else?

In forum discussion, don't take it like you must convince the whole forum, take as voicing your opinion for discussion.

I knew you were going to use that as an excuse to launch that insinuation. Objection or not to my personal preference is a matter that concerns my freedom to choose. My freedom to choose is a right which I have sole prerogative. Just as nobody can object to my preference for fat girls or young girls. I don't need your objection or acknowledgement in that respect. Your acknowledgment adds nothing to my existing right to choose.

Insinuation on the other hand has nothing to do with my freedom to choose but "what" I choose. So your acknowledgement of my "freedom" to choose does not excuse your personal attack on "what" I choose.

 

[Ramseth]

Insinuation on the other hand has nothing to do with my freedom to choose but "what" I choose. So your acknowledgement of my "freedom" to choose does not excuse your personal attack on "what" I choose.

Since when have I personally attacked you? I'm just voicing my preference and opinion. Didn't you too? You taking issues too personally doesn't mean another is attacking you personally. Both are just voicing preference and opinion to be open for discussion in forum.

 

[Khun Ying Pojaman]

Since when have I personally attacked you? I'm just voicing my preference and opinion. Didn't you too?

Yes, you admitted it was an insinuation, and then suddenly it's a harmless "voicing my preference and opinion".

 

[Ramseth]

Yes, you admitted it was an insinuation, and then suddenly it's a harmless "voicing my preference and opinion".

Re-read, I said not only insinuation but rights to assertion. I didn't insinuate. I asserted my rights to my opinion, so can you assert yours.

 

[chonburifc]

Simi is insuniation? Knn google translate don't have this word.

 

[rusty]

Simi is insuniation? Knn google translate don't have this word.

suan siow or kong lan jiao wei ?

 

[chonburifc]

suan siow or kong lan jiao wei ?

Hehehe. Thanks bro. Khao jai laew.