Re: 60 men may be charged for having sex with underage sexy c-cup teen model on porn
Yet more wayang bullshit from the SPF and the AG chambers. Of course, forumners reading this also got no fucking brains? The big question is how does the SPF proof that these men fucked the girl? Handphone record is it? Handphone record can only proof that a call was made from that particular phone to solicit sex from the underage girl. It does not proof the same person was making the call, unless SPF got voice recognition technology to match up all these calls which they must have recorded. Unless the girl says that she can match all 60 voices to the faces that fucked her, which is highly unlikely. Use video footage from the hotel cameras? I doubt that too, most hotel videos are on a 24 hour loop, which means they get erased. Anyway, no hotel likes to be known to provide their camera footage of guests to the police.
So, did the girl collect 60 samples of semen from all these customers, and the police performed 60 DNA tests to confirm these are the guys? I doubt it. The evidence was swallowed long ago. So, my question is in the end, how to proof definitively that these are the guys? It essentially their word against the girl, unless they were so stupid to admit they actually fucked the girl. Also, why was the girl and the papasan not prosecuted? This is a clear case of human trafficking. SPF trying to send a message to who? Everyone to stop pooning? Stupid.