He is new and he has been the contrarian in this forum. I did not see any post from him that was abusive and he certainly was not spamming. Any reason why he has been zapped to this extent.
We cannot go forward if we only accept the same views or can we? I have no issues if people give him a hard time in this forum but taking him out circulation is not kosher.
If you're talking about giving "Disagree" to one of his posts, then I can put up my hand too. I have not done that to many forummers post (less than 3 I think). Most of the time I give "Agree" and from what I understand I can only do so once.
If I agree very much with a post, I click agree. If I disagree very much, I click disagree. I will do either only if it resonates very well or irritates very badly because I understand I can do that only once per forummer. I don't see anything to apologise for that and also do not really bother that it increases or decreases repute points of that person.
On a separate issue, study the chap's postings - he makes 19 posts per day despite being under moderation. 500 posts in just 3 weeks. Not that I agree with him being under mod - but another Joseph Ong would have been born if he was not.
