• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The Hunger Games Trailer HD 2012

Are you going to watch Hunger Games in theatre?

  • Yes, I will definitely watch it in the theatre

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • No, i will download, buy dvd/blu-ray instead

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • No, not interest in teenage movie

    Votes: 1 33.3%

  • Total voters
    3
  • Poll closed .

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
For fans of the young-adult series "The Hunger Games," this is a banner week. The film version opens to U.S. audiences this coming Friday, and the cast has been on a global tour for the last week at official premieres in cities around the world.

It struck me when I looked at this photo from the German premiere a couple of days ago that the dresses worn by Elizabeth Banks, left (who plays Effie Trinket), and Jennifer Lawrence (who plays heroine Katniss Everdeen in the film and is in a hand-draped lace frock by Marchesa here) look like they could stand in for the flame dress that Katniss wears in the story -- at least, judging by their color they could.

The flame dress proved a particular challenge for costume designer Judianna Makovsky. I mean, how do you design a dress that's going to burst into flames without hurting the wearer? Los Angeles Times Fashion Critic Booth Moore talked with Makovsky and found out the answer to this as well as other considerations that went into costuming the populace of the dystopian universe of "The Hunger Games." Moore writes about it in this week's Image section.

I have a hunch that the costumes, as well as hairstyles and makeup in the movie, are going to spark some trends we'll be seeing plenty of this spring and summer on the streets of Los Angeles.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
So, The Hunger Games undoubtedly will be big. It probably will be bigger than Twilight.

But Harry Potter?

Here's why The Hunger Games is unlikely to dethrone the box-office king of film franchises:

RELATED: J.K. Rowling an Ex-Billionaire?!

1. Family-Friendly Fantasy vs. Dystopian Mayhem: This is a big one. The first Potter film was a bring-the-kids-and-uncles, PG-rated crowd-pleaser. The Hunger Games is a PG-13 tale of teen-vs.-teen slaughter that was seven seconds away from a stiff movie rating in the United Kingdom. All in all, don't expect a lot of minivan sightings at opening-weekend Hunger Games theaters.

2. Source Material: Author Suzanne Collins' Hunger Games book trilogy has reportedly sold 26 million copies—a phenomenal number. The Potter films were spawned from the J.K. Rowling series that sold 15 times that many volumes.

3. High Bar: The first Potter set an opening-weekend mark with a then-record $90 million Friday-Sunday debut. While The Hunger Games is expected to clear that number, and maybe with room to spare, it's not expected to set a new opening-weekend record (although, for what it's worth, it could do just that in the boy wizard's own U.K. home.)

4. Higher Bar: If 2001's Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone had sold tickets at 2011 prices ($7.93 instead of yesteryear's $5.65), then, assuming attendance remained the same, the movie would have posted a $126 million debut. That kind of performance is on the upper edge of expectations for The Hunger Games.

5. International Flava: Sorcerer's Stone played to its base, stocking its cast with U.K. stalwarts such as Richard Harris and Alan Rickman. The Hunger Games has Aussie Liam Hemsworth, but largely filled out its character roles with Americans (Donald Sutherland, Woody Harrelson, etc.). The suggestion here is not that Sorcerer's Stone cleaned up because of Maggie Smith; the suggestion here is that names like Smith's do matter to overseas audiences, and that the Jennifer Lawrence-led Hunger Games may leave some money on the table because it stayed true to its U.S. roots—and didn't try to sell the old sci-fi movie trope that we'll all sound vaguely British in the near future.

The Bottom Line: There's only one Harry Potter. There's only one Twilight, for that matter. And there's only one Hunger Games. Comparisons are inexact and unfair. The Hunger Games will heretofore not be judged against anything—until, that is, it opens next weekend.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
With more than 26 million books in print followed by pandemonium at the film premiere of The Hunger Games, fans everywhere are obsessed with the tale of a brave girl in a bleak future world. This week's issue of PEOPLE talks to the young soon-to-be superstars of the action series that sparked a worldwide phenomenon – Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, and Liam Hemsworth, as they brace for Twilight-level fame. "I did indies and I was in X-Men, but that was a franchise that I just joined at the end," says 21-year-old Lawrence, who plays teenage heroine Katniss Everdeen. "This is like 'N Sync," she says of the ear-splitting fan passion she experienced during a mall tour to promote The Hunger Games. "This is crazy."

And it's only just begun. What started out as a young-adult trilogy by author Suzanne Collins is now poised to catch fire in a big way. Although fan reaction to the trio's casting was initially mixed (some fans complained that Lawrence was too old, Hutcherson too short, and Hemsworth too blond) each star nailed their respective auditions. Director Gary Ross (Seabiscuit) says Hemsworth, 22, "came in with this brash, cocky quality that I saw in Gale and read in a perfect American accent. When he left, he said, 'Thanks, mate,' and I was like, 'Holy cow, this guy is from Australia!'"


Like the Twilight series, The Hunger Games features a love triangle between the three sexy young stars. Unlike in Twilight, however, the romance takes a back-seat to themes of loyalty, oppression, and the sinister undertones of today's reality-TV culture. "There's no schoolgirl crush happening here," says costar Elizabeth Banks, who plays government official Effie Trinket. "The stakes are too high for that. This isn't about a first kiss. This is life and death."

Lawrence, who shares her character's disarming bluntness, is already feeling the pressure of meeting her fans' expectations. "I'm now a role model for young girls, so my language has had to change a lot," she says of curbing her cursing habit. Her intense training regimen included hot yoga, freestyle running and shooting 100 arrows a day with an Olympic archery medalist. "Often in the film, you see Jennifer 80 feet up in a tree – obviously on a safety harness," says Ross. "But how did she get in the tree? She climbed the freaking tree!" Hutcherson, 19, who plays her Games competitor Peeta, packed on 15 lbs. of muscle through strenuous exercise and eating "five giant meals a day" of chicken breasts and broccoli. "By the last meal, you're like, 'I can't even look at this chicken, but I have to eat it,'" he recalls. "But it worked."

Having twice played an impoverished young survivor – in 2010's Winter's Bone and again in the Games, Lawrence says, "If I get a script, I'm like, 'Does this character like the woods?' Get it out of here. I just wrote an e-mail, 'No more white trash with too much responsibility.'"

Ross is confident that his stars are prepared for the pressures of anchoring a megafranchise. "With Josh and Jen and Liam, I think they're more interested in acting than they are in being famous," he tells PEOPLE. "I think all of the [mania] is a weird distraction to them. I think they're going to take care of their talent and work hard and turn into actors with a lot of depth and breadth." Regarding the fan mania, "I don't think about getting swarmed at Comic-Con, I think about getting killed at Comic-Con," says Lawrence. "I'm terrified of Comic-Con."
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The Hunger Games: Film Review

Directed by Gary Ross and based on the first in a trilogy of best-selling novels, the film stars Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson and Liam Hemsworth as teens living in a dystopian future in which young people are forced to fight to the death on live television.

The arrow hits an outer circle of the target in The Hunger Games, an amply faithful adaptation of Suzanne Collins' monster young-adult best-seller that could have used a higher blood count in more ways than one. As she did in her breakthrough film Winter's Bone, Jennifer Lawrence anchors this futuristic and politicized elaboration of The Most Dangerous Game with impressive gravity and presence, while director Gary Ross gets enough of what matters in the book up on the screen to satisfy its legions of fans worldwide. This Lionsgate release is being positioned as the hottest property for the teen audience since Twilight, and there's no reason to believe that box office results won't land roughly in that vaunted vicinity.


Published in 2008, The Hunger Games marked the beginning of a trilogy, rounded out by Catching Fire and Mockingjay, which has in toto sold more than 26 million copies, with many more to come now that the film has arrived. A giant opening weekend beginning March 23, which is all but guaranteed, will no doubt trigger a green light for the second big-screen installment in the series, for which the three lead actors are already set.
A speculative fiction piece about a 16-year-old expert hunter who becomes one of 24 teenagers to compete in an annual televised combat spectacle from which only one will emerge alive, Collins' tale rips along on the page with unflagging momentum while generating legitimate suspense and a strong rooting interest in its resourceful heroine. So visually vivid are the book's episodes that you can practically picture a film version while reading it, meaning that it would have been foolish for any filmmaking team to veer far from the source.
With Collins on board as both a co-screenwriter and executive producer, there was little chance of that, so it's more a matter of emphasis and cinematic elan. Ross, Collins and third writer Billy Ray have stressed the fascistic political side of the story, pointing up the micromanaged manipulations of the public and the games themselves while also suggesting that contemporary reality shows and televised competitions differ from this extravaganza only in their lower mortality rate.
As for visual spectacle, there's enough but, along with it, a feeling of being slightly shortchanged; the long shots of gigantic cityscapes, of a fast train gliding silkily through the country, of massive crowds gathered to see this year's gladiators before they set off to kill one another, of the decorative flames emanating from the leads' costumes as the pair is presented to the public for the first time -- all are cut a bit short, as if further exposure would reveal them as one notch below first-rate. On the other hand, the costumes and makeup are a riot of imagination designed to evoke a level of topped-out decadence comparable to that of Nero's Rome or Louis XVI's Paris.
Most noticeable of all, however, is the film's lack of hunting instinct. The novel conveyed a heady sense of blood-scent, of Katniss Everdeen's lifetime of illegal hunting paying off in survival skills that, from the outset, make her the betting favorite to win the 74th edition of the Hunger Games. While present, this critical element is skimmed over onscreen, reducing a sense of the heroine's mental calculations as well as the intensity of her physical challenges and confrontations. One senses that the filmmakers wanted to avoid showing much hunting onscreen, for fear of offending certain sensibilities; stylistically, one longs for the visceral expressiveness of, say, Walter Hill in his prime. It's also clear that the need for a PG-13 rating dictated moderation; a film accurately depicting the events of the book would certainly carry an R.
That said, Hunger Games has such a strong narrative structure, built-in forward movement and compelling central character that it can't go far wrong. From the outset, it's easy to accept a future North America, once decimated by war and now called Panem, divided into 12 districts kept under tight control by an all-powerful central government in the stunningly modernistic Capitol.
Katniss, embodied by Lawrence just as one might imagine her from the novel, lives in far-flung District 12, a poor mining region that can only have been Appalachia in earlier times (indeed, the film was shot in North Carolina). Like all other teenagers, she's annually entered in the Reaping, in which a boy and girl from each district are chosen by lottery to compete in a murderous contest designed both for its political symbolism and public intoxication value. When her beloved little sister's name is shockingly called, Katniss, a dead shot with bow and arrow, volunteers to take her place as a district Tribute, alongside Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson), a shy, seemingly sweet kid with goo-goo eyes for Katniss. Her male model-like soulmate Gale (Liam Hemsworth) gets left behind.
The remainder of the first hour details the contestants' preparation for the games. This involves cleaning, buffing and accoutering (rather like what happens to the visitors upon arrival in The Wizard of Oz), fight training alongside fellow combatants, abundant eating, tactical advice from oft-inebriated long-ago District 12 winner Haymitch (Woody Harrelson) and a public interview conducted by flamboyant TV host Caesar Flickerman (Stanley Tucci ), a one-man panic so skilled at playing his guests that he gets Peeta to confess his adoration for the unsuspecting Katniss. Decked out with a balloon of backswept blue hair finished off by a giant bun, Tucci has a ball with this fun character, who serves to frame the brutality to come as entertainment by accentuating its personal melodramas.
Once thrown into “the arena,” a topographically varied stretch of wilderness, the Tributes do whatever it takes to survive. Quite a few are butchered at the outset in the mad dash for weapons and supplies. For her part, Katniss hightails it for the interior, where she sleeps out of sight in trees before the “gamemaker,” Seneca (Wes Bentley), has her flushed out by wildfire. The film goes further than the book in illustrating how omnipotent studio controllers can manipulate the action as they wish, in ways they feel will create better television and, in the bargain, please their all-powerful president (Donald Sutherland), who will countenance no sign of resistance or rebellion.
And, yet, that is what happens when the games' youngest and sweetest contestant, Rue (Amandla Stenberg), after bonding with Katniss, is abruptly killed. Everything that happens out in the field is captured by countless hidden cameras (Ross and cinematographer Tom Stern shift between lush, steady camerawork for “objective” coverage and a jittery, hand-held style for on-the-spot verite footage), and Rue's death ignites unrest in her working-class district. But this represents a mere prelude to what Katniss pulls off in the ingenious climax, which troubles the already suspicious president and neatly sets the stage for the political turmoil of the sequels.
A crucial area in which the film falls far short of the book is the charade aspect, as Katniss experiences it, of her “romance” with Peeta. Without her interior narration and deliberate play-acting once she allies herself with her fellow District 12 cohort, the gradations of her ambivalence and acceptance are smoothed over to the point of blandness. The survival story retains its vitality, but what lies underneath is stunted.
At the center of things most of the time, Lawrence remains compelling all the way. As in Winter's Bone, she's onscreen alone, or nearly so, a great deal, and she holds one's attention unselfconsciously, without asking for attention or even doing much other than the task at hand. Lawrence is one of those performers the camera loves; her appearance alters in different scenes and shots -- lingering baby fat shows here, she resembles a Cleopatra there -- and she can convey a lot by doing little. An ideal screen actress.
The young men on hand can't measure up to her standards and, while Harrelson has his moments, the combustible Haymitch has been rather cleaned up from the book. Making a decided impression here is Lenny Kravitz, who will probably field more acting offers after his turn as Katniss' charismatic stylist Cinna (quite a few characters are named after Romans).
Production values are ample if not lavish. The soundtrack, a joint venture between composer James Newton Howard and executive music producer T Bone Burnett, features an intriguing blend of regional and atmospheric flavors (the end-title tune from Taylor Swift engages on a first listen), though more musical propulsion would have helped juice things up in the late going.
Opens: Friday, March 23 (Lionsgate)
Production: Color Force, Lionsgate
Cast: Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Liam Hemsworth, Woody Harrelson, Elizabeth Banks, Lenny Kravitz, Stanley Tucci, Donald Sutherland, Wes Bentley, Toby Jones, Alexander Ludwig, Isabelle Fuhrman, Amandla Stenberg
Director: Gary Ross
Screenwriters: Gary Ross, Suzanne Collins, Billy Ray' based on the novel by Suzanne Collins
Producers: Nina Jacobson, Jon Kilik
Executive producers: Robin Bissell, Suzanne Collins, Louise Rosner-Meyer
Director of photography: Tom Stern
Production designer: Philip Messina
Costume designer: Judianna Makovsky
Editors: Stephen Mirrione, Juliette Welfling
Music: James Newton Howard
Executive music producer: T Bone Burnett
Special effects supervisor: Sheena Duggal
PG-13 rating, 142 minutes
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The Hunger Games: Film Review

Dystopian. Post apocalyptic. Long after Justin Bieber is gone. Welcome to the world of “The Hunger Games.”
Based on the best-selling young adult book series, our first glimpse into this world is a television interview — Stanley Tucci’s ostentatious, blue-haired Caesar Flickerman interviewing head Gamemaker Seneca Crane on a set that resembles”American Idol’s.” Appropriate, since Flickerman would be the result if Ryan Seacrest fathered a child with Phyllis Diller. More about him later.
Then the fun begins.
What was once the United States of America is now the country of Panem, a totalitarian regime comprised of 12 Districts under the sadistic rule of the Capitol. Its iron-fisted grip around its citizens’ necks tightens once a year during the dreaded Hunger Games: a tournament to the death between 24 teens, one boy and one girl from each district. The unwilling participants are called tributes, as in a tribute to the Capitol as a reminder of how it subjugated the districts all those years ago. The Hunger Games are big television: like the Super Bowl, only with lots of death, better technology and no commercials. Even the Reaping, when the teens are drafted into The Hunger Games, is shown across the nation.
Enter our hero, Katniss Everdeen, played by Jennifer Lawrence. Katniss is a hunter who sneaks beyond the electric fence surrounding abject poverty of her District 12 home to provide for her mother and sister. Beyond that fence, she meets up with her handsome friend Gale (Liam Hemsworth) and also retrieves the bow and arrows she hides in a tree. Unlike the heroine in that other teen literary sensation, Katniss will not fall in love with a vampire or flirt with a werewolf; she has far less fantastical problems in this gritty reality. Every second she lives is the result of a life and death decision — including her heroic decision to volunteer for the games in the place of her little sister Prim when the latter’s name is called at the Reaping.
So, what about the actual Hunger Games? In a word: spectacular. Under Gary Ross’ direction, the games seem like an actual annual event he’s filmed before. You don’t need 3D and those pesky glasses to feel right in the middle of 2D action that’s so realistic, you might pull a hamstring just watching it. Visually, the futuristic control room where Seneca Crane and his team manipulate the arena, both challenging and attempting to kill the tributes, is reminiscent of the one in “The Truman Show,” only 3000 times cooler.
The supporting cast is terrific as well. Josh Hutcherson plays fellow tribute and potential love interest Peeta Mellark with subtlety and quiet confidence. Also great is rock star Lenny Kravitz in his much buzzed-about role as Cinna, Katniss’ stylist and sounding board. Elizabeth Banks plays the outlandish Effie Trinket with relish, Woody Harrelson nails his role as the alcoholic former Hunger Games winner Haymitch Abernathy, and Stanley Tucci brings so much fun to Caesar Flickerman, he could have his own movie or TV show — heck, his own breakfast cereal! Flicker Flakes, anyone?
It’s not all good, though. Donald Sutherland’s dictatorial President Snow shows a tremendous amount of restraint: too much, as he never seems quite as scary as he should be. That lack of fear that blunts the emotional impact of the film’s ending, but doesn’t negate at least two other scenes that’ll have you either cheering or will bring you to tears.
Ultimately, though, “The Hunger Games” doesn’t work without Jennifer Lawrence. This future Oscar winner — a bold statement, yes, though not for this role — is the embodiment of Katniss Everdeen, and movie audiences will be smitten.
As far as comparing “The Hunger Games” books to “The Hunger Games,” the film? I’m now a fan of both.
Four out of five stars.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The Hunger Games Lives Up to the Hype: PEOPLE Review

Katniss Everdeen's (Jennifer Lawrence's) life was difficult enough before she was forced to try to kill 23 other children on national television.

Fatherless and starving in District 12, the mining center of dystopian future world Panem, she takes her little sister Prim's (Willow Shields's) place as a tribute, fighting to the death in an elaborate spectacle broadcast as a reality show.

To add poison to the sting, Katniss is expected to kill her own teammate, Peeta (The Kids Are All Right's charming Josh Hutcherson), a sweet boy who has a crush on her.


Yes, The Hunger Games is feral, but its unwillingness to coddle its young audience is what made author Suzanne Collins's trilogy such a hit. The movie sticks close to the first book, with detail-perfect renderings of the districts, the Capitol, the arena – and certainly of Katniss.

Lawrence, an Oscar nominee last year for Winter's Bone, is a fan's dream. With her soulful eyes and innate grit, she gives skilled hunter Katniss equal doses of complexity and appeal. Forget Twilight's insipid Bella Swan. This is a literary heroine girls can cherish.

Woody Harrelson, Elizabeth Banks and Lenny Kravitz have marvelous supporting roles, but the film isn't always as strong as its stars. Its subtleties may get lost on viewers new to the story. Still, it's so fiendishly engaging the even darker, scarier sequels can't come fast enough.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Review: 'Hunger Games' should satisfy fans


Recently, I made the mistake of joking on Twitter about the possibility of a Team Peeta vs. Team Gale dynamic, referring to the two young men who hold special places in the heart of Katniss Everdeen, the 16-year-old heroine of "The Hunger Games."

Some people played along but many were appalled at the very idea of something as cliched and flimsy as a love triangle defining the young woman they've come to admire so fiercely from Suzanne Collins' best-selling trio of novels, the first adaptation of which makes its way to the screen this weekend amid great fervor and expectation.

I learned very quickly: These people do not mess around when it comes to Katniss.

Those same fans should be thoroughly satisfied with the faithfulness of Gary Ross' film, with its propulsive nature and vivid imagery: a mix of decadent costumes and architecture and harsh, unforgiving exteriors. At its center is Jennifer Lawrence, an ideal choice to play this strong, independent young woman. Those who saw her Oscar-nominated performance in 2010's "Winter's Bone" already were aware of her startling screen presence — her natural beauty, instincts and maturity beyond her years. And yet there's a youthful energy and even a vulnerability that make her relatable to the core, target audience of female fans. Lawrence is endlessly watchable, and she better be, since she's in nearly every single shot of Ross' film.

And speaking of Ross, he may seem an unlikely choice to direct a movie about a futuristic, fascist world in which teenagers must fight each other to the death in an exploitative display of national loyalty and pride. He is, after all, the man behind such clever, charming and uplifting films as "Dave," ''Pleasantville" and "Seabiscuit." But those movies, while based on high-concept premises, ultimately had pointed things to say about politics and society. The methodology of "The Hunger Games" may be more complicated but its darkly satirical message is unmistakable.

The script adheres rather closely to Collins' novel — no surprise there since she co-wrote it with Ross and Billy Ray — although it does truncate some of the subplots that give the book its greatest emotional heft as well as soften the brutal violence of the games themselves, ostensibly in the name of securing a PG-13 rating. Still, the makers of "The Hunger Games" have managed the difficult feat of crafting a film that feels both epic and intimate at once.



A post-apocalyptic version of North America has been divided into 12 districts. Every year, a teenage boy and girl from each are selected randomly at the "Reaping" and sent to the opulent, art deco Capitol, where they're made over, trained and primed to fight each other until one is left standing in the sprawling arena. Gamesmakers manipulate their surroundings, "Truman Show"-style; Wes Bentley, sporting fiendish facial hair, functions as a sadistic version of Christof in a control room on high.

Every minute of competition is breathlessly broadcast to the nation, with viewers rooting for and betting on their favorites; having a sympathetic back story is crucial, and similarities to reality shows like "Survivor" or even "American Idol" are clearly intended. Even the program's host (Stanley Tucci in an upswept blue 'do) has a huge personality but isn't so outlandish that you couldn't image him as the face of some top-rated primetime game show.

Katniss lives with her widowed mother and beloved younger sister, Prim, in the distant District 12, known for its poverty and mining — a place visually reminiscent of the Ozarks of "Winter's Bone." An expert hunter with a bow and arrow, she spends her days seeking food for her family in the forest with her best friend, the hunky Gale (Liam Hemsworth). Some of the strongest moments in "The Hunger Games" are not the big action sequences, where the effects tend to look a bit cheesy, but rather the quieter exchanges like the ones Lawrence and Hemsworth effortlessly share.

But when Prim's name is called at the Reaping, Katniss springs into action to volunteer instead. This is one of those scenes in which you don't need to have read the book to feel emotionally engaged; the drama and the tears feel real, and they're not overplayed. Katniss' male counterpart is Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson), the baker's sweet but bland son. Together they're to receive mentoring from the frequently inebriated Haymitch (Woody Harrelson), the last winner from District 12; the character's rough edges have been buffed significantly and it's not an improvement. Elizabeth Banks is nearly unrecognizable as Effie, their garish, perky escort. They also undergo mandated makeovers from their stylist, Cinna (Lenny Kravitz in an inspired bit of casting — he and Lawrence have a lovely rapport together).

There's never any question as to whether Katniss will win — there are two more books waiting to be made into movies after this one — so the challenge comes from maintaining a sense of tension and immersion in this dystopian world as competitors drop off one by one, which Ross and Co. achieve. "The Hunger Games" runs nearly two and a half hours in length but is the rare film that never drags and doesn't overstay its welcome. It could keep running as long as Katniss does, and we'd want to be right there every heart-pounding step of the way.

"The Hunger Games," a Lionsgate release, is rated PG-13 for intense violent thematic material and disturbing images — all involving teens. Running time: 142 minutes. Three stars out of four.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Review: Big screen Hunger Games is a winner


The violent dystopia of The Hunger Games became a cult sensation — even eclipsing the mournful Gothic romance of Twilight — for a good reason. Novelist Suzanne Collins invented a world that encapsulated a cultural nightmare: reality television meets high school, spiced with the twin adolescent suspicions of a grim future and adult perfidy.

The result is a story of teenagers forced to fight to the death for the grown-up crime of being rebellious, while a worldwide TV audience sits transfixed.

It evokes a mixture of desperation and star-crossed love, a manhunt-to-the-death that stands as a metaphor for both modern entertainment and yearning adolescence. And the whole school is there: the nice kids, the anonymous ones, the dangerous cliques. This is a teen epic with an adult face, YouTube with murder.

In The Hunger Games myth, an America of the future, called Panem, has undergone a civil war and emerged as a police state run from a tyrannical Capitol. In Gary Ross’s film version, the set design combines fascist heroic architecture (grand plazas, oversized rooms) with Italian modern furnishings and fashions that look like what might happen if Lady Gaga were elected empress. It’s all gold, glitter and curlicue hairstyles: One character wears a beard that’s cut into a design of paisley.

Things aren’t so grand in Panem’s provinces, however. In District 12 — a coal-mining area pictured as a forlorn territory of shacks and creased faces — 16-year-old Katniss Everdeen has become an expert archer, killing squirrels to keep her family fed. Katniss (the names in The Hunger Games sound like what movie stars might be calling their children 100 years from now) is played by Jennifer Lawrence with the same steely intelligence she showed in Winter’s Bone, a more contemporary nightmare of Ozarks culture.

The conquered rebels are forced to take part in a deadly retribution. Once a year, on “Reaping Day,” two teenagers are chosen by lottery from each district, fed at lavish banquets — The Hunger Games borrows a tone of immoral corruption from the last days of the Roman Empire — trained in gladiatorial combat, and sent out to slaughter one another. The entire spectacle is shown on TV, including a pre-fight introduction hosted by an overbearing ringmaster (Stanley Tucci) that is part professional wrestling and part beauty pageant.

Katniss becomes a District 12 combatant when she volunteers to replace her younger sister. She is paired with Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson), the town baker who has a crush on her, which adds to the tragedy: Only one survivor is allowed.

There’s a triangle in all this, as well:Katniss must leave behind Gale (Liam Hemsworth), her old hunting friend. But that doesn’t play out much in this first movie of a likely Hunger Games trilogy. It seems mostly designed to give Katniss the enviable problem (which of these two hunks should she choose?) that drives so much young adult fiction.

But Ross avoids the pitfalls that would make The Hunger Games too schmaltzy. He’s had some experience in these matters: His 1998 comedy Pleasantville was almost The Hunger Games in reverse, with two teenagers transported back in time to live in an anodyne 1950s TV sitcom. That film evolved from black and white into rich colour; The Hunger Games is in colour, but feels dreary and washed-out. Ross is spare in his use of music, and he frequently uses a hand-held camera to give the film a documentary intimacy. He also avoids overly explicit violence.

The Hunger Games has a rich sense of history that bobs on the surface of its culture of grim amusement. In the glitzy world of the film’s first half, Katniss and Peeta take part in lavish, pre-butchery feasts and then try ingratiate themselves to the “sponsors” who might help them later. “It’s a television show,” says Haymitch (Woody Harrelson), a previous Hunger Games winner — drunk much of the time, as he would be — who is brought on board as a mentor. In a world-become-television, appearance is all.

Lurking in the shadows is President Snow (Donald Sutherland), the malevolent architect of the event, whose understanding of crowds — the blood lust, the role of the underdog — marks him as dangerously conniving. “A little hope is effective,” he says. “A lot of hope is dangerous.” He’s not the first American leader to speak about hope, but he’s the first to make it into a threat. The road between here and there may be shorter than we fear.


Four stars out of five
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
OH NO OH NO, the review are starting to pour in, and it look like the hype is not met. i am so sad.

 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Movie Review: The Hunger Games Is Either Terrific or Just OK—It All Depends on You

Should you go see The Hunger Games? Please. Like it even matters what we say next. But if you don't happen to be the kind of person who can name the exports of all 12 districts of Panem followed by a flawless rendition of "The Weeping Call," keep reading.

We've seen the most hyped film of the year and compiled this handy review: Simply look through the categories below, determine which one applies to you, and your own custom review of The Hunger Games will follow!


Option 1: You Are...a Superfan! You read all three Hunger Games novels in five hours or less, and then you read them again.

This film will not disappoint—much. Lead actress Jennifer Lawrence is at her best when she's miserable, and her character is not a happy survivalist as she's tossed into a giant outdoor cage match to the death. (After 3 minutes, you won't be able to imagine anyone else playing Katniss Everdeen, trust.)

Director Gary Ross actually outpaces the breathless clip of Suzanne Collins' novel. He also takes pains to honor many of the smallest details: Cinna's gold eyeliner, Katniss's braid, Effie Trinket's cotton-candy-colored wigs.

But Ross does diverge from Collins's beloved novel in at least three key points, including the jarring climax at the Cornucopia. So if you're the kind of person who insists on slavish retellings of novels on the big screen, stay home.

Your Grade: B

* * *

Option 2: You Are...Kind of a Fan! The book was OK, but the movie sounds more intriguing.

If you like the notion of two dozen big-screen teenagers clobbering each other with flying knives out in the wilderness (and, really, who doesn't?) this hotly-paced flick is definitely for you.

Ross delivers the dystopian excitement in high style, mixing naturalistic action with retro-futuristic production design that is sure to draw Oscar honors.

A few actors turn in less-than-solid performances, namely Woody Harrelson and the barely-seen Liam Hemsworth, but Lawrence, Elizabeth Banks, Stanley Tucci, Donald Sutherland and Lenny Kravitz all bring their A-games to the arena.

Your Grade: A

* * *

NEED MORE LIAM HEMSWORTH? Fine. Here.

Option 3: You Are...Skeptical! You hated the books, but you love watching people suffer on a big screen.

Give the movie a shot, young sociopath. Of course, Collins' book doesn't always do a bang-up job of selling a post-apocalyptic future. But the movie does.

Almost every scene is twisted or disturbing in its own very special way. Ross' vision of the tribute training hall, for example, evokes a nightmare gym class. Whenever possible, Ross turns to handheld cameras, documentary-style techniques and POV shots to elevate Collins' arguably uneven book into a shockingly buyable tale of kill or be killed.

Even the color palette at the Capitol, with its cool or acid tones, is designed to unnerve, and, unless you're a serial killer yourself, unnerved you will be.

Ross also amps up Collins' obvious condemnation of our current obsession with reality TV, making the movie, perhaps, even more relevant right now than the novels.

Your Grade: B+

* * *

Option 4: You Are...a Normal Person! You just want an alternative to Twilight, alreadys.

Take comfort. There are no vampires, brooding or otherwise. No teenage girls sitting in the same room for months after being dumped. No windbag arguments about who needs to protect whom.

There's, like, killing going on here, as in, nearly a dozen teenagers cutting each other down in a matter of minutes, and all over a few backpacks and some water canteens.

There are kids getting mauled by genetically enhanced bees; kids getting trapped in nets and gutted with projectiles; kids cradling dinner rolls because they're just that hungry. If you don't see that as the antithesis of Twilight, we can't help you.

In fact, the only aspect of The Hunger Games that remotely resembles Twilight is its love triangle. And none of these kids from District 12 are about to start sparkling in the sun. It's just too darned dangerous.

Your Grade: A

So which kind of fan are you?
 
Top