• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Jesus tomb found??

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Quote from comment section:

Biblical Jesus wasn't even a real person. Just a rehashing of the Horus, Dionysus, Mithra, Krishna, et. al. stories.

[video=youtube;aNw1uPwQXsM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNw1uPwQXsM[/video]
 

Devil Within

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
University of Iowa assistant professor of classics and religious studies Robert Cargill thinks the story is bogus, saying that there are "clearly handles on the top of the so-called ‘Jonah fish' image, but Tabor and Jacobovici don't include them in their museum replicas or the CGI image: "No credible scholar except those that work with or for Simcha on this or some other project believe his conclusions… The evidence does not support their sensational claims. But that doesn't stop them from wanting it to be true, so in their minds, it's true."

cartoon-scoutslaughing.gif
 

Clone

Alfrescian
Loyal
Historical Jesus was a real person.

A revolutionary of his time but His message got lost along the way.
 

denzuko1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Clone: Historical Jesus was a real person.

A revolutionary of his time but His message got lost along the way.
This is based on whose account? How did this person derive at such conclusion? Does he tell you that you should believe in him because those who did not believe is ignorance and true happiness is to believe in the existence of Jesus even without proof?

Your own comment already proves that there is no evidence of his existence. All evidence of his existence is base on the assumption that he existed and then creating proof of his existence. Such pre-suppositions plus their evidence created to support are misleading and should not be trusted.
 
Last edited:

Muthukali

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/4T0fAbknJc8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I found the real person.
 

drifter

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
this kind of thread must be in religious folder ....knn must banned him liao ...no matter how hard he pray also cannot escape :wink:
 

denzuko1

Alfrescian
Loyal
To be fair to the Chirsitan, there are "evidence" from the programs that seemed fabricated. I am not sure about others, but the quote on Buddha's life time is certainly doctored to match that of bible.

For instance, there is no Buddhist script that mentioned Buddha was born of a Virgin. Lama in Tibetean does not mean goat, sheep or any 4 legged organism, its meaning is High Priest. This video is no better than those fabricating stories to try hard justifying the existence of Jesus.
 

greedy and cunning

Alfrescian
Loyal
Historical Jesus was a real person.

A revolutionary of his time but His message got lost along the way.

his teaching was edited by paul and later compiled and edited by those men who were in the Council , this were during the days of catholic christainudity.
and later still by whose who formed the modern christianudity ,the Anglican and Protestant , when they broke away from mainstream catholic.
all done supposedly in the name of god ,but in fact to further the grip and control of their own position.

by the way there is nothing revolutionary about his messages , he was just a jew who went about doing what the jews were doing, following their age old
religion practices.
maybe he was the leader of his particular sect. rumours has it that he was of royal descendant and he was trying to lead the jews to be free from the
roman control.
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Historical Jesus was a real person.

A revolutionary of his time but His message got lost along the way.

Actually, it was the message conveyed that is important. Why did the jews go against jesus? because there was a jewish religion and jesus was against any form of evil and tyranny, especially under religious guise. Religion enslave the people. and jesus was there to set them free.
In todays world, it is doctrines such as communism and capitalism.or even Kim'ism in the case of north korea, or PAP'ism in our case.
 

Clone

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is based on whose account? How did this person derive at such conclusion? Does he tell you that you should believe in him because those who did not believe is ignorance and true happiness is to believe in the existence of Jesus even without proof?

Your own comment already proves that there is no evidence of his existence. All evidence of his existence is base on the assumption that he existed and then creating proof of his existence. Such pre-suppositions plus their evidence created to support are misleading and should not be trusted.

To be fair to the Chirsitan, there are "evidence" from the programs that seemed fabricated. I am not sure about others, but the quote on Buddha's life time is certainly doctored to match that of bible.

For instance, there is no Buddhist script that mentioned Buddha was born of a Virgin. Lama in Tibetean does not mean goat, sheep or any 4 legged organism, its meaning is High Priest. This video is no better than those fabricating stories to try hard justifying the existence of Jesus.

his teaching was edited by paul and later compiled and edited by those men who were in the Council , this were during the days of catholic christainudity.
and later still by whose who formed the modern christianudity ,the Anglican and Protestant , when they broke away from mainstream catholic.
all done supposedly in the name of god ,but in fact to further the grip and control of their own position.

by the way there is nothing revolutionary about his messages , he was just a jew who went about doing what the jews were doing, following their age old
religion practices.
maybe he was the leader of his particular sect. rumours has it that he was of royal descendant and he was trying to lead the jews to be free from the
roman control.

I view the historical Jesus revolutionary as first, He sought to free the Jews from the Romans.

Second, His central message (not the Christian faith message) is to liberate the people from the go-betweens seeking "salvation", your personal salvation. There are no room for gods, priests, temples, rituals etc. It's all within you.

Strictly personal opinion.
 
Top