• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

How a really classy minister would have responded to Gerald Giam

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
"There is no doubt that Mr Giam and his colleagues have put in a lot of thought and effort in putting the proposals that he has just outlined in the House today. WP's contribution to the government's efforts towards a better Singapore in the future are appreciated. Given the short time that they had, they have done a great job. The government itself, took more than one year, involved the civil service in getting the data and interviewed more than 2,000 people. There are certainly gaps in the information which are available to WP. If they had requested for some data, we would have been happy to supply. (Okay, I am lying, as usual...)

In view of these, perhaps Mr Giam can elaborate on the following suggestions which I do not concur with readily. These are:

xxx
yyy
zzz"

Instead, we have an "acting" minister who behaves childishly like a spoilt brat, full of arrogance with the sneering look on his face. Not so long ago, he was a military man whose favourite words were "yes, sir" and today, he strutting around like some fcuking peacock, his MOM having fcuked up quite a few things which even made the headlines in ST.

Mr Tan, please, behave yourself with decorum and do not continue to delive the "kurang ajar" attitude which you have displayed since day one.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
would be really interesting if WP manages to put forth some credible stuffs, workable solutions. that would be akin to a parliamentary slap across the face of TCJ :p:p:p
 

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
The arrogance is because he had people saying "Yes Sir" to him since his early 20s. An age where most of us are beginning to understand the realities in life and he was having it too good all the while.
 

giggity_shit

Alfrescian
Loyal
"There is no doubt that Mr Giam and his colleagues have put in a lot of thought and effort in putting the proposals that he has just outlined in the House today. WP's contribution to the government's efforts towards a better Singapore in the future are appreciated. Given the short time that they had, they have done a great job. The government itself, took more than one year, involved the civil service in getting the data and interviewed more than 2,000 people. There are certainly gaps in the information which are available to WP. If they had requested for some data, we would have been happy to supply. (Okay, I am lying, as usual...)

In view of these, perhaps Mr Giam can elaborate on the following suggestions which I do not concur with readily. These are:

xxx
yyy
zzz"

Instead, we have an "acting" minister who behaves childishly like a spoilt brat, full of arrogance with the sneering look on his face. Not so long ago, he was a military man whose favourite words were "yes, sir" and today, he strutting around like some fcuking peacock, his MOM having fcuked up quite a few things which even made the headlines in ST.

Mr Tan, please, behave yourself with decorum and do not continue to delive the "kurang ajar" attitude which you have displayed since day one.

Cannot expect PAP to hold WP hand mah. Parlaiment is Collosseum!!
 

batman1

Alfrescian
Loyal
U know how army works,General order to capture Hill 69,anyone who disobeys order will be charged for insubordination,bring in the artillery and airforce to flatten the ground,bring in the infantry to capture target but got ambushed by enemy,ground troops wiped out,heavy casualties.WTF,fake intelligence.
 

streetsmart73

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
"Classy Ministar" in SG context is an oxymoron.


hi there


1. aiyoh!
2. some running dog making it big in the tailwing of some dafter sheep.
3. isn't it from the same herd of dafter sheep.
4. kosong material too:biggrin:
 

Kinana

Alfrescian
Loyal
"There is no doubt that Mr Giam and his colleagues have put in a lot of thought and effort in putting the proposals that he has just outlined in the House today. WP's contribution to the government's efforts towards a better Singapore in the future are appreciated. Given the short time that they had, they have done a great job. The government itself, took more than one year, involved the civil service in getting the data and interviewed more than 2,000 people. There are certainly gaps in the information which are available to WP. If they had requested for some data, we would have been happy to supply. (Okay, I am lying, as usual...)

In view of these, perhaps Mr Giam can elaborate on the following suggestions which I do not concur with readily. These are:

xxx


Contrary to what you just said, this issue of increasing population had been the forefront of the national debate for the last 5 years at least. The fact that WP had failed to provide a logical and coherent set of proposals that was easily challenged and taken apart upon simple questions was very telling in that they had really not been putting thought and effort to the problems facing Singapore.
Tan was correct in his speech. In effect, WP is only good for rhetorics and nothing more.
 

giggity_shit

Alfrescian
Loyal
"The PAP is a COMPETENT govt and Singaporeans need to give it more time." - WP Chief Low Thia Kiang


Contrary to what you just said, this issue of increasing population had been the forefront of the national debate for the last 5 years at least. The fact that WP had failed to provide a logical and coherent set of proposals that was easily challenged and taken apart upon simple questions was very telling in that they had really not been putting thought and effort to the problems facing Singapore.
Tan was correct in his speech. In effect, WP is only good for rhetorics and nothing more.
 
Top