Nice Goot has been consistently slandering Sylvia with no basis.... at the same time he has contributed nothing except wasting bandwidth and getting paid by PAP/SDP agents ....
FUCK HIS LAO MOTHER CHAO CHEE BYE!!!!:oIo::oIo::oIo:
SUrprisingly all the WP jiak liao bee insects has been quiet while the dua neh bu zeh zeh ish insulted for fun ..
PUI CHAO NUAH at all WP members in sammy :oIo::oIo::oIo::oIo::oIo:
the below is by Sylvia
As I think back now,Tang’s shouts of “Merdeka” at a lunch time rally at UOB
Plaza still ring in my ears to this day. So high, it seems, were the stakes at GE 1997. On New Year’s Day 1997, on the eve of Polling Day, JBJ stood at the WP rally stage at Yio Chu Kang stadium and said that he had with him Tang’spolice reports against “Goh Chok Tong and his people”. For that statement, 8 legal suits were commenced in the High Court against JBJ. Deeply troubled and upset, I wrote to JBJ enclosing a donation. Thus we became friends.
Occasionally, I visited him in his law office. As he was representing Tang in legal suits as well, JBJ’s office was full of piles and piles of legal documents and affidavits filed. It is not an exaggeration to say that one had to tip toe through the piles in order to move around. JBJ would be busy drafting replies with the help of his lone secretary, Mrs Chiu. It gave the David and Goliath story new meaning. As the months passed, JBJ had to pay all sorts of damages, or face bankruptcy. In early 1999, I remember receiving a work bonus. With all my heart, I gave it to him, hoping it would somehow forestall what was to befall him. I know of many others who made contributions. Indeed, JBJ seemed to be regularly saddled with big amounts to pay, at one point about half a million. What were our contributions in the deep pit of defamation damages?
Around that time, 3 polytechnic lecturers decided to make a short film on JBJ, to be aired at a local film festival. JBJ invited me to lunch with him and then to go to the launch of the film. When we arrived at the launch venue, we discovered to our surprise that the film had been delisted from the programme, because it had not been passed by the Board of Film Censors. The lecturers were not at the launch, and JBJ told me he could not contact them for many days. Later, there were reports that they were being investigated for an offence under an obscure section of the Films Act. That section continues to haunt Singaporeans today, but probably not for much longer, as the People’s Action Party has indicated that they have already made political films videos about themselves which they will be showing once the law is amended!
Around the year 2000, I invited JBJ to a small birthday party at my family home. Several friends and my family were there. As with most of my family occasions, alcohol was always available for merry-making. Though JBJ was a whiskey man, he whispered to me that as it was Holy Week (in the Christian calendar, the days preceding Good Friday), he did not “mean to be sanctimonious” but would not want to drink. As I recall, a clergyman among my friends assured him that his salvation would not hinge on that evening alone¡*and thus was he persuaded.
FUCK HIS LAO MOTHER CHAO CHEE BYE!!!!:oIo::oIo::oIo:
Bro,allow me do away with all the niceties and use an parliamentary language just this time.
Is it a 'kelong'?
You see,if it walks like a duck and quake like a duck,the chances are that it's indeed a duck.
We are not talking about novices here.There are three trained lawyers among WP MPs...and one a Rhodes scholar who worked overseas all his life.How can they act so amateurish?
What takes the piece of the cake is that among the WP MPs there is a veteran politician like LTK who had crossed swords with the likes of LKY .And there is Sylvia Lim,who went before the best and brightest legal eagles on this earth in an International Bar Association (IBA) symposium to argue for the very judiciary to the disgust of JBJ,and Dr.Chee.It's not a coincidence that she stood against the very JBJ,who blowed life into the Worker's Party which was defunct after it's establishment by David Marshall.JBJ spilled his guts and blood for 20 years before LTK and Sylvia LIM came aboard WP and yet these two capitulated the old lion.........are we to believe that they are that easily trapped by PAP?
Something stinks terrible here.
LTK has a track record of betraying his very mentor JBJ.And Sylvia Lim herself who came from the police force was simply parachuted from nowhere as WP chairman--immediately after JBJ forced exist out of the very party he nurtured like a baby.And went one step further to defend the tyranny of PAP ISD arbitray arrests and bankrupting opposition figures --by our beholden judiciary.A very possibility that another invisible hand,most likely PAP, involved .What's more the devil,LKY,himself gave a helping hand to LTK in winning past elections.
WP as a wayang party is not a contemplation anymore.The very facts are simply starring at us.How can we ignore it?
Because what is a simple logic to you and me who re novices in the arena of politics seems to escape WP MPs.How can we ignore this drama any longer?
Simply put,what transpired in the parliament is simply a 'kelong'.Worse WP is scoring against itself.
It's to raise profile of newer ones?....I speculate that precisely what Sylvia Lim is gonna say next.
And Sylvia Lim wants to test the newer ones at this crucial times?
Now,talking about Sylvia Lim,I have absolute disgust for her.I have been a fiery critic of PAP in this forum.But Sylvia Lim is by far a worse animal than LKY.By her mere act of defending our beholden judiciary.Even if she had an axe to grind with JBJ or disagreed with other oppositions there is absolutely no need to defend the devil itself.Her action is totally unwarranted.She had choice but she chose to be with the devil.As a matter of fact,Sylvia defense of of our beholden judiciary is a gross injustice to the likes of Chia Thye Poh and many others whose entire life along with their families too were ruined.I don't know how she can sleep peacefully with such a record.
Who is Sylvia Lim......and what is her role in the image building of Yaw?
Why?
Because if anyone's to tell me that Yaw's gallivanting had escaped WP's radar all this while than I say bullocks!
Come on fellas,...can any womanizer operates like a lone ranger?I mean like a spy in the dark,who sits next to you unknown and as a family orientated next door neighbor who takes your children and his to the zoo?Nah !....the profile of a womanizer is indeed loud.And what more the physical profile of Yaw fits very much of a toy boy.The sort older woman likes to keep company with and who sits when the woman cmmands.
So,it would interesting to know what is the relation between a single unmarried older woman who just happens to be also the chairperson of WP and Yaw.
No,I am not kidding.
The rise of Sylvia an Yaw in WP is mired in mystery.Unlike any opposition figures who slought it out to make a mark.Take GMS,for example....years after years and he is still under our harsh scrutiny.
It's time we micro examine Sylvia with the same limelight as Yaw.
I certainly hope to be proven wrong about Sylvia....especially now that opposition desperately needs good man and more importantly woman to stand against the might of PAP.
But I still cannot digest the fact that she by her choice alone stood with PAP against JBJ -the very giant who breathed life into WP with his blood,sweat,wealth and sacrificed everything that he held dear for the sake of democracy in Singapore.I am,of course,talking about the International Bar Association's -Rule of Law Symposium held at Suntec City.By her logical extension, did Singaporeans want Mr Chia Thye Poh's three-decade detention? Did Singaporeans want the media to be completely under the thumb of the PAP? Did the people support the manipulation of the electoral process?
Yes bro,that's what Sylvia Lim stood for in front of the world audience.
But instead she got a slap on her face when the same IBAHRI released it's own report later which expressed concern about human rights and the independence of the judiciary in Singapore here--http://www.ibanet.org/Article/Detail.aspx?ArticleUid=0081C460-4B39-4ACB-BB40-8303FCEFDB31
I often wondered how on earth could she sleep so peacefully by defending the bloody path PAP took. Are we talking about the same Sylvia Lim?
I am not exactly a WP lover.Because I still cannot digest the fact that Sylvia Lim by her choice alone stood with PAP against JBJ -the very giant who breathed life into WP with his blood,sweat,wealth and sacrificed everything that he held dear for the sake of democracy in Singapore.I am,of course,talking about the International Bar Association's -Rule of Law Symposium held at Suntec City.By her logical extension, did Singaporeans want Mr Chia Thye Poh's three-decade detention? Did Singaporeans want the media to be completely under the thumb of the PAP? Did the people support the manipulation of the electoral process?
Yes bro,that's what Sylvia Lim stood for in front of the world audience.
But instead she got a slap on her face when the same IBAHRI released it's own report later which expressed concern about human rights and the independence of the judiciary in Singapore here--http://www.ibanet.org/Arti/Detail.aspx?ArticleUid=0081C460-4B39-4ACB-BB40-8303FCEFDB31
Hence I see a repetition here.
Sort of tit for tat.
Though KJ has every right to do unto Sylvia Lim for what she did to JBJ.......his father.
But for the sake of opposition unity,opposition parties must close rank now.
That would be political maturity if not statesmanship.
SUrprisingly all the WP jiak liao bee insects has been quiet while the dua neh bu zeh zeh ish insulted for fun ..
PUI CHAO NUAH at all WP members in sammy :oIo::oIo::oIo::oIo::oIo:
the below is by Sylvia
As I think back now,Tang’s shouts of “Merdeka” at a lunch time rally at UOB
Plaza still ring in my ears to this day. So high, it seems, were the stakes at GE 1997. On New Year’s Day 1997, on the eve of Polling Day, JBJ stood at the WP rally stage at Yio Chu Kang stadium and said that he had with him Tang’spolice reports against “Goh Chok Tong and his people”. For that statement, 8 legal suits were commenced in the High Court against JBJ. Deeply troubled and upset, I wrote to JBJ enclosing a donation. Thus we became friends.
Occasionally, I visited him in his law office. As he was representing Tang in legal suits as well, JBJ’s office was full of piles and piles of legal documents and affidavits filed. It is not an exaggeration to say that one had to tip toe through the piles in order to move around. JBJ would be busy drafting replies with the help of his lone secretary, Mrs Chiu. It gave the David and Goliath story new meaning. As the months passed, JBJ had to pay all sorts of damages, or face bankruptcy. In early 1999, I remember receiving a work bonus. With all my heart, I gave it to him, hoping it would somehow forestall what was to befall him. I know of many others who made contributions. Indeed, JBJ seemed to be regularly saddled with big amounts to pay, at one point about half a million. What were our contributions in the deep pit of defamation damages?
Around that time, 3 polytechnic lecturers decided to make a short film on JBJ, to be aired at a local film festival. JBJ invited me to lunch with him and then to go to the launch of the film. When we arrived at the launch venue, we discovered to our surprise that the film had been delisted from the programme, because it had not been passed by the Board of Film Censors. The lecturers were not at the launch, and JBJ told me he could not contact them for many days. Later, there were reports that they were being investigated for an offence under an obscure section of the Films Act. That section continues to haunt Singaporeans today, but probably not for much longer, as the People’s Action Party has indicated that they have already made political films videos about themselves which they will be showing once the law is amended!
Around the year 2000, I invited JBJ to a small birthday party at my family home. Several friends and my family were there. As with most of my family occasions, alcohol was always available for merry-making. Though JBJ was a whiskey man, he whispered to me that as it was Holy Week (in the Christian calendar, the days preceding Good Friday), he did not “mean to be sanctimonious” but would not want to drink. As I recall, a clergyman among my friends assured him that his salvation would not hinge on that evening alone¡*and thus was he persuaded.