• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Zakir Naik lecture in Qatar World Cup 2022 - "Does God exist?"

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
If you were at least a CECA Muslim, you would have sided with Zakir Naik instead of your ceca coreligionists.

zakir naik has been proven to be a liar. Why would anyone, other than fellow liars, side with zakir naik?
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
Looks like we have quite a number of Zakir Naik fanboys here. :biggrin:

I would rather trust Zakir Naik who has academic and professional qualifications rather than this idiotic apostate of dubious mental capacity.
Evolution is a theory. Even if the majority of scientists believe it to be true does not make it true.
If evolution is true it would be repeatable and demonstrable in experiments.
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
If he is talking rubbish as you claimed, then he is no great preacher.

He also talked big about how CECA virus would be "number 1 superpower" in the world, in order to appease saffron terrorists of course. In the end, the saffronites still kicked him out of his country that he held so dear to his heart.

Talking rubbish on some issue does not negate his triumph over kuffar in plenty of verbal exchanges.



You need some lubricant for your sore anus? moslem men with big beards enjoy sodomizing little boys like you.

Why did you fantasize me as some little boy unless it was your subconscious mind reminding you of your "glory days" when your pastor deflowered your arse to your great pleasure? Pink Dot SG beckons you.
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
zakir naik has been proven to be a liar. Why would anyone, other than fellow liars, side with zakir naik?


1. Prove that he was proven to be a liar.

2. You were proven to be a liar.

3. Even if was proven wrong on several occasions (such as drinking urine, which is a CECA national pastime or declaring CECA the "number 1 superpower" in the world), then there are other issues which are not related to these blunders where he did a fine job of trouncing kuffar.

Example.

 

duluxe

Alfrescian
Loyal
I would rather trust Zakir Naik who has academic and professional qualifications rather than this idiotic apostate of dubious mental capacity.
Evolution is a theory. Even if the majority of scientists believe it to be true does not make it true.
If evolution is true it would be repeatable and demonstrable in experiments.

If Naik is a trustworthy peacher, he would not be blacklisted by MUIS. I find his sermons extremely peaceful.
 

Singapore Dancing Spirit

Alfrescian
Loyal
Zahir Naik is one of the CECAs from the CECA-land, a land of RAPISTS

1672412615005.png


IN INDIA, the rapists no wonder, MURDER the victim after a gang rape
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
I would rather trust Zakir Naik who has academic and professional qualifications rather than this idiotic apostate of dubious mental capacity.
Evolution is a theory. Even if the majority of scientists believe it to be true does not make it true.
If evolution is true it would be repeatable and demonstrable in experiments.


Well said, bro.

You show signs of above average intellect.

This is a common fallacy that whatever is popularly accepted must be true. Another common fallacy is reference to some sort of perceived authority automatically proves your argument. E.g. if so called scientists are seen as authorities on certain issues much like how ang moh kia in centuries past used to revere their priests and pastors unquestioned (even after their arses were deflowered plenty of times by the same priests and pastors, you can ask that chink faggot @JohnTan for greater clarity on the matter), and if you refer to such a scientist(s), then by default, your argument is considered valid by a lot of ignoramuses/dunces even if reality might be different.
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
Zahir Naik is one of the CECAs from the CECA-land, a land of RAPISTS

View attachment 174198

IN INDIA, the rapists no wonder, MURDER the victim after a gang rape


Where did you make up this fake quote from?

Can you provide us with a video of his statement quoting exactly what you quoted?

Don't fabricate accusations.

As we have seen, all that kuffar like that faggot @JohnTan and now @truthseekee are left with is fabrication in order to defame a (perhaps great) person.

All in vain, anybody with double digit IQ or higher can see your repeated failures.

If you need to fabricate stories about a person in order to defame him, it means he has already won.
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
You are a CECA Hindu pretending to be melayun and you prove it again and again.

If you were at least a CECA Muslim, you would have sided with Zakir Naik instead of your ceca coreligionists.

Alas! 78 IQ does not help.
I am a malay patriot tr to save the malays from mental incaretation by the religious hierarchy.
And zakir naik is a mere humsn being subject to criticism. He is no prophet as he is a wanted criminsl in india for diverting money donated money into real estate under his brothers name.
 
Last edited:

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
I am a malay patriot tr to save the malays from mental incaretation by the religious hierarchy.
And zakir naik is a mere humsn being subject to criticism. He is no prophet as he is a wanted criminsl in india for diverting money donated money into real estate under his brothers name.


Wanted by Saffronite terrorists on trumped up charges since they can't defeat him in debate.

I thought that was too obvious, why would you use that bogus line of defence if you were not a ceca polytheist.

Melayun incl Indon have been poisoned by saffronite polytheist ideology for too long they were never Islamic to begin with. That's why they've got no civilization to their name or anything of note whatsoever.

The so called Islamic gunpowder empires were Mughal empire (which ironically ruled over a large number of ceca polytheists), Safawi (shia sectarian empire, sectarian ideology not preferred for good reason by me and many others) and Ottoman empire (ruling over arab countries incl Turkiye and some parts of caucasus balkans etc) and going as far as to "dominate" Mediterranean sea for quite some time.

But to be fair, they also lost to tiny portugal less than a 100 years after liberating Istanbul, and they lost against Portugal looooong before Industrial Revolution, so that's a major deficiency. Likewise Iran Pakistan afghanistan uzbekistan anatolia syria iraq along with tiong russkie ukraine poland were conquered by mongols and maybe even devastated subjugated.

The mongols were only good on land, not on water. On land, they attacked Muslim ruled Sultanate in Delhi, more than once, and they were defeated every single time.

This is a major difference between saffronite terrorists who were ruled by their Muslim masters for 1000 years, or various other losers, who are used to losing from loooong ago before Industrial Revolution compared to many others who never lost to a gayropean power or country, ever, in entire recorded history, before industrial revolution.


I mean the much hyped, or feared, mongols of that time also could not defeat the Muslim Sultanate in Delhi even once despite numerous attempted invasions and it's also true that ibn Battuta did stay in the courts of the Muslim Sultan of Delhi for some 7 to 8 years while he was a great traveller whose wanderlust led him to travel around much of the known world, it is in Muslim Delhi and also neighbourhood that he praised highly. He also went to Bangla, Assam, Ceylon, Maldives, Sindh, Hind, Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Syria (Sham) Palestine Suudi Anatolia, Constantinopole (now Istanbul) southern Russkie territory, tiongkok all over tiongkok, indon, jiuhu, maybe even pinoy or viets, and many more places in africa or gayrope.
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
If Naik is a trustworthy peacher, he would not be blacklisted by MUIS. I find his sermons extremely peaceful.
Preachers who rightly remind Muslims not to say Merry Christmas as it implies they agree that Jesus is Son of God, will attract the ban. We Muslims know there are KAAFIRS in MUIS.
 

Singapore Dancing Spirit

Alfrescian
Loyal
Preachers who rightly remind Muslims not to say Merry Christmas as it implies they agree that Jesus is Son of God, will attract the ban. We Muslims know there are KAAFIRS in MUIS.
Haha

There are many...otherwise SG would not have repealed 377A in the first place
Even Madam Halimah kept her mouth shut.
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
Preachers who rightly remind Muslims not to say Merry Christmas as it implies they agree that Jesus is Son of God, will attract the ban. We Muslims know there are KAAFIRS in MUIS.


Melayu have never been Muslims.

Otherwise given stinkypura inherent disadvantage pulverizing it would have been a piece of cake for all its transgressions against Islam and Muslims. And by Melayun, of coz, i also include Indon too.
 

duluxe

Alfrescian
Loyal
Preachers who rightly remind Muslims not to say Merry Christmas as it implies they agree that Jesus is Son of God, will attract the ban. We Muslims know there are KAAFIRS in MUIS.

Haha, all the Taliban and ISIS preachers qualified your defination of trustworthy preachers.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
1. Prove that he was proven to be a liar.

Read the parts about zakir instructing mohammedans to drink camel urine, claiming that it's good for them. Btw, zakir was merely quoting from your hadith scriptures, which stated that your own 'fake prophet' recommended drinking camel urine.

The mongols were only good on land, not on water. On land, they attacked Muslim ruled Sultanate in Delhi, more than once, and they were defeated every single time.

You talking about alauddin khalji?

He was famous for being a faggot, enjoying banging little boys. His favourite was some boy sex slave eunuch malik kafur. Do you aspire to be as the next 'malik kafur' ?
In exchange for getting himself sodomized by alauddin, malik kafur years later blinded alauddin's older sons.

Alauddin khalji at one point of his kingship, was openly considering declaring himself as 'Prophet' of his own religion, just like what mahomet did.

Your 'almost prophet' alauddin won wars against the Chagatai Khanate, a branch of the Mongols not known for their military prowess.

Why did you fantasize me as some little boy unless it was your subconscious mind reminding you of your "glory days" when your pastor deflowered your arse to your great pleasure? Pink Dot SG beckons you.

If you're a moslem, you're a boy regardless your age.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
I would rather trust Zakir Naik who has academic and professional qualifications rather than this idiotic apostate of dubious mental capacity.

Can't wait for you to drink camel urine too. Your guru, zakir naik, endorsed it. He said camel urine is prescribed in your moslem scriptures.
 
Top