- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 13,736
- Points
- 113
she voted for the pap as she would not have this opportunity to have her favorite exercise if she were to vote oppo.
perhaps she's alive and kickin - as her fav exercise was at that age and posit at 69...mystery solved :pshe voted for the pap as she would not have this opportunity to have her favorite exercise if she were to vote oppo.
he will......but only for those who were gainfully employed, not for those that indulge in exerciseAh Chee Soon Juan should also fight for retirement benefits for this auntie!!!!
Many will vote for him!
After exercising at the Bukit Batok Nature Park on Sunday morning, Dr Chee said he felt good about the ground campaign. Together with his team, Dr Chee outlined plans to continue engaging residents on SDP's proposals to tackle issues like the rising cost of living and elderly care. He will also be pushing for a retrenchment insurance scheme, which he said some experts had agreed with.
"The minute you're retrenched, for the first six months you get three-quarters of your last drawn salary capped at median wage. After six months if you're still not employed, it goes down to 50 per cent. After the third period of six months, that goes down to 25 per cent. That at least gives it that temporary respite that the retrenched worker needs, and it's not, as they say, a luxury. It's allowing people to have that sanity to go out and look for jobs without panicking,” said Dr Chee.
//cna
you sounded just like the arsehole ministar who thinks that at age 89, they are still exercising.
Who did she vote for?
Pap after a pack of chicken rice from PA crasslooters
agreed absolutely, it'll be more costly and shouldn't keep them cooped-up as they need to exercise purposefully.It is what it is. Purposeful exercise. Do people prefer to round up all the old and frail into an old folk lockup, become bedridden and immobile, or out in the open enjoying the sun and breeze marvelling at the amazing transformation of their country from Third World to First? That why i dislike talk big NATO warriors like krafty! :oIo:
agreed absolutely, it'll be more costly and shouldn't keep them cooped-up as they need to exercise purposefully.
afterall, they won't last long and are low-maintenance - since they oni live on fresh air and sunshine :(
It is what it is. Purposeful exercise. Do people prefer to round up all the old and frail into an old folk lockup, become bedridden and immobile, or out in the open enjoying the sun and breeze marvelling at the amazing transformation of their country from Third World to First? That why i dislike talk big NATO warriors like krafty! :oIo:
It is what it is. Purposeful exercise. Do people prefer to round up all the old and frail into an old folk lockup, become bedridden and immobile, or out in the open enjoying the sun and breeze marvelling at the amazing transformation of their country from Third World to First? That why i dislike talk big NATO warriors like krafty! :oIo:
The fact that there are so many old yet mobile citizens in Singapore proves just what a good job the PAP government is doing.
In the West they'd all have to depend entirely on their mobility scooters to get around.