• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Yingluck Shinawatra - pretty woman, populist politician but bad businesswoman

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
12,469
Points
113





June 18, 2013

<nyt_headline type=" " version="1.0">Thailand Acknowledges $4.4B Loss From Rice Scheme</nyt_headline>

<nyt_byline>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

</nyt_byline><nyt_text><nyt_correction_top></nyt_correction_top>BANGKOK — Thailand's government on Tuesday acknowledged losing more than $4.46 billion in one year in a much-criticized scheme to support rice prices that ended up dislodging the country from its spot as the grain's top exporter. The program is likely to be amended to reduce the losses, the commerce minister said.

Prime Minister's Office Minister Warathep Rattanakorn said government sales of rice it purchased from farmers fell far short of the sum it paid to the farmers under the 2011-12 subsidy program, accounting for the loss. The government had been criticized for refusing to disclose the losses and the amount of rice it has been forced to stockpile.

Under the scheme, the government buys rice from farmers at about $490 a ton, hundreds of dollars more than the market price. Its inability to resell much of it on the international market allowed India and Vietnam to surpass Thailand in the value of their rice exports.

The government's National Rice Policy Committee announced plans on Monday to lower the payments to farmers.

Commerce Minister Boonsong Teriyapirom said the Cabinet is expected to approve the planned change and it is likely to take effect June 30.

"The adjustments will show that even though the government is trying to implement several policies that benefit the people, it is also adhering to fiscal discipline," he said.

Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra said the government will attempt to reduce its losses by cutting expenses but also strive to maintain farmers' incomes.

Subsidies for rice farmers were launched in 2004 when Yingluck's brother, Thaksin Shinawatra, was prime minister and implemented a host of populist policies. The scheme was criticized then for alleged graft and high costs, and Thaksin was ousted by a military coup in 2006 after protests in the capital against his alleged corruption and abuse of power.

The scheme was revived by Yingluck as a flagship policy in her 2011 election campaign.

She implemented the program in October 2011, with no limits on the amount of rice the government would purchase. So far, the government has bought 35.2 million tons of rice, paying farmers more than $11 billion, while earning $1.9 billion by reselling some, Warathep said.

The project's expenses also include its administration through the government-owned agricultural bank and costs of storing the rice in warehouses, totaling $482 million.

"In terms of accountancy, it might be called losses," Yingluck said. But she said the losses actually meant gains for Thai farmers who have benefited from the scheme.
<nyt_correction_bottom>
</nyt_correction_bottom><nyt_update_bottom></nyt_update_bottom>
</nyt_text>








<iframe style="top: -32000px; position: absolute;" src="http://b.scorecardresearch.com/p?cs_iframe=1&ns_ad_sv=3.1301.16&ns__p=1372897278430&c2=3005403&ns_site=&ns_iframe=0&ns_ad_sd=1024x819&ns_ad_vw=1010x674&ns_ad_sc=0x0&c1=2&ns_type=hidden&ns__t=1372897279085&ns_c=utf-8&c8=Thailand%20Acknowledges%20%244.4B%20Loss%20From%20Rice%20Scheme%20-%20NYTimes.com&c7=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2Faponline%2F2013%2F06%2F18%2Fworld%2Fasia%2Fap-as-thailand-rice-.html%3Fref%3Dyingluckshinawatra%26_r%3D0%26pagewanted%3Dprint&c9=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2Faponline%2F2013%2F06%2F18%2Fworld%2Fasia%2Fap-as-thailand-rice-.html%3Fref%3Dyingluckshinawatra%26_r%3D0" width="1"></iframe>
 
Last edited:
logo_post_b.gif
[h=1]Yingluck Axes Thai Commerce Minister After Moody’s Rice Critique[/h]<cite class="byline"> By Suttinee Yuvejwattana and Daniel Ten Kate - Jun 30, 2013</cite>
Thai Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra dropped Commerce Minister Boonsong Teriyapirom from the Cabinet following criticism that a policy to buy rice at above-market rates jeopardized the country’s fiscal position.
The move comes about a week after Yingluck cut guaranteed rice-purchase prices by 20 percent to stem losses the government estimates at about 137 billion baht ($4.4 billion) for last year. Moody’s Investors Service said on June 3 the subsidies hamper Thailand’s goal of achieving a balanced budget by 2017 and are negative for the nation’s sovereign ratings.

Yingluck is aiming to bolster her government’s popularity after polls showed a decline in support and farmers protested at her office in Bangkok. Thailand’s finance ministry cut its 2013 economic growth forecast to as low as 4 percent on June 27 from 4.8 percent previously because of a slow recovery among trade partners and weaker private sector spending.

Niwattumrong Boonsongpaisan, a minister in the premier’s office, will replace Boonsong. The rice policy, along with a minimum-wage increase and incentives for car buyers, was among the key campaign pledges from Yingluck’s party in winning a parliamentary majority in 2011. The win was the fifth straight victory for allies of her brother, Thaksin Shinawatra, who was ousted in a 2006 coup and has lived overseas since 2008 to avoid a jail term on charges he says are politically motivated.

In other changes, Pracha Promnog replaced Chalerm Yoobamrung as a deputy prime minister, with Chalerm appointed to head the labor ministry, according to a statement published in the Royal Gazette. Yingluck will take on the additional role as defense minister.
[h=2]Rice Spending[/h]Varathep Rattanakorn was named as a minister in the prime minister’s office and a deputy farm minister. Yuthasak Sasiprapha was appointed deputy defense minister, Yanyong Phuangrach was named deputy commerce minister, Benja Louichareon becomes deputy finance minister and Chaikasem Nitisiri takes over as justice minister. Chaturon Chaisang will be the education minister.
Thailand has spent 588.7 billion baht since October 2011 to buy 40.47 million tons of unmilled rice from farmers. The program has increased domestic demand and purchasing power by 2 percentage points and helped improve farmer income by about 115 billion baht a year, according to the government.
Yingluck’s popularity has fallen in recent months, Bangkok University said in a survey of 1,234 people taken from June 18 to June 20. The margin backing her as prime minister over opposition leader Abhisit Vejjajiva dropped to 8.6 percentage points, down from 14 in November 2012, the poll showed.
 
Bad businesswoman? Compared to our top investor Queen Whore Jinx's losses.........
 
Yingluck's rice policy costs USD4.4billion in one year. If she continues this, total losses will be about USD8.8billion after another year. In comparison, at least Ho Ching's investments have some hope for upside, but there is no upside for rice subsidies.
 
Just for merely to continue get support from the rural Thais...
 
the Thaksins are Zionist puppets.........they'll bankrupt Thailand so the country will borrow money from their Zionist owners of IMF and World Bank.......the twin loansharks for countries..........
 
Yingluck's rice policy costs USD4.4billion in one year. If she continues this, total losses will be about USD8.8billion after another year. In comparison, at least Ho Ching's investments have some hope for upside, but there is no upside for rice subsidies.

It is Keynesian fiscal stimulus lah. Thai economy is boosted as farmers spent their income. Farmers are happy, economy growth is boosted. That's a double win.

In sinkapore, PAP throws money to the foreigners and scholars ...foreigners send money home while scholars stash their wealth overseas. No stimulus at all!
 
It is Keynesian fiscal stimulus lah. Thai economy is boosted as farmers spent their income. Farmers are happy, economy growth is boosted. That's a double win.

In sinkapore, PAP throws money to the foreigners and scholars ...foreigners send money home while scholars stash their wealth overseas. No stimulus at all!

This I agree, but not your blind support for shitty opposition.
 
Bad businesswoman? Compared to our top investor Queen Whore Jinx's losses.........

That's right. At least in Yingluck's case, a huge segment of the people(farmers) benefited. In Whore Jinx, no one gains except those "cho boh lans" at Temasek with their big fat indecent bonuses. And what's more, Yingluck is good to look at, unlike that manly woman.
 
Yingluck's rice policy costs USD4.4billion in one year. If she continues this, total losses will be about USD8.8billion after another year. In comparison, at least Ho Ching's investments have some hope for upside, but there is no upside for rice subsidies.

What upside? Do u know how much Whore Jinx lost during the Lehman crisis? Do u know? It's idiotic comments by PAP balls carriers like u that will help PAP ruin Singapore.
 
It's idiotic comments by PAP balls carriers like u that will help PAP ruin Singapore.

No need to resort to name calling. I am not a PAP balls carrier. Just trying to stimulate discussion here. Yingluck is no different from other politicians who resort to subsidies, like in Malaysia and Indonesia. And Singapore.
 
FUCK PAP, FUCK PAP, FUCK PAP.........
MAY PAPEES, CRONIES N FAMILIES BURN ETERNALLY IN HELLS.........
MAJULLAH SINGAPURA.........
GOD BLESS SINGAPORE..............
REMEMBER to

VOTE papees OUT



do yrself, yr forefathers and yr generations to come, a favor, a service and a long-awaited justice





;););):D:D:D;););)
 
What upside? Do u know how much Whore Jinx lost during the Lehman crisis? Do u know? It's idiotic comments by PAP balls carriers like u that will help PAP ruin Singapore.

yingluck are no better than ho jinx with this rice subsidies as it only benefit ppl who voted for her and her party. what about the urban poor?
 
yingluck are no better than ho jinx with this rice subsidies as it only benefit ppl who voted for her and her party. what about the urban poor?

Can the urban poor help to vote her party in? It's clear that the majority of her support comes from the rural poor and that's who they will help.
 
No need to resort to name calling. I am not a PAP balls carrier. Just trying to stimulate discussion here. Yingluck is no different from other politicians who resort to subsidies, like in Malaysia and Indonesia. And Singapore.

I am just calling a spade a spade. If not "PAP balls carriers" then what else should we call people who blindly defend their PAP political masters? Perhaps u prefer to be called "PAP running dogs". What sort of discussion can u stimulate with such an idiotic statement that Whore Jinx investments at least have an upside with the billions that she had already lost and not call to account at all.
 
...with such an idiotic statement that Whore Jinx investments at least have an upside

The stock portfolio has increased in value. Hmm, looks like the investments do at least have an upside. I wonder who is an idiot.

temasek.jpg
 
no biggie. u.s. politicians help corn farmers keep price of corn high in the same fashion in order to win their votes. in the rural areas and corn farms, every vote counts and in fact is disproportionately more important as a handful of farmers' votes can decide the electoral success of any candidate in that precinct, district or county. they obviously learn "democrazy" the american way.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top