WTF, ntuc fairprice switch off security camera to cut cost

[halsey02]

By the way, it is technically an offence to tie a pet to a tree in public and leave it unattended. Though a minor offence, and no police will bother with it since the petowner has no intention of abandoning the dog and is grieving over her lost dog.

CSj tie his dog to the tree, it will be a major offence!, the dog will be compounded by AVA immediately...and shot!

 

[ChaoPappyPoodle]

STOMPER?? STOMPERs have nothing better to do but to post stupid things like this:oIo::oIo:...

people definitely can do whatever they want but they also need to answer for their own actions. by blaming others wont get his dog back.

After reading the article you found it better to hone in on the petowner's absolute trust in society against a policeman that, in all likelihood, refused to receive a report to accept that a crime had PROBABLY taken place.

I tke offence to your area of preference. It flies against civil society. It is an affront against what should be standard police practice, which is to assist the public. You do a disservice to the public. Let Singaporeans do what they want as long as they do not hurt others or unless there is a good chance that others may be hurt.

You are like Ho Peng Kee who refused to allow SDP to have an event along the eact coast beach for fear of creating a political upheaval. You are like the PAPies who refuse to allow for an honest and thriving media industry.

You are a PAPdog and if you insist you are not then chances are that you somehow managed to untie yourself from the PAPy tree and found some rat poison infested rojak and are now sharig with us your state of delirium.

 

[Ramseth]

Everyone has the right to lodge a police report. Its up to the Police Officer to classify the report. They just don't want a report lodged because of the paper work involved and the review process by the Seniors. In this case, they can't assume the dog strayed and it has to be classified as theft for purpose of investigation.

In fact a Police report need not be on a prescribed form. Even a letter or an email can treated as a Police report. The lady can also lodge a report via the internet using the Police website.

These rules apply across the Commonwealth, the French and the US system.

You're right. Verbal also constitutes a report, e.g. 999 call.

In my days, we took all kinds of report, classify later. It was to classify whether or not there're grounds for investigation or further action. It wasn't to pre-screen whether or not it constitutes a police report. It caused lots of paperworks and formalities shuffling here and there, resulting in high workloads relative real works done. Common complaint was police spending time shuffling papers and mediating for aunties and uncles quarreling, wasting fuel and manpower with patrol cars going to tell people to stop playing mahjong too late; never go catch robbers wasting taxpayers' money.

However, nowadays, request for written report can be rejected, e.g. lost IC report won't be taken, redirect to SIR directly (no pun intended), you have to prove above certain probability that's stolen for it to be taken as a written police report. Which system is better? I also can't say.

 

[ChaoPappyPoodle]

By the way, it is technically an offence to tie a pet to a tree in public and leave it unattended. Though a minor offence, and no police will bother with it since the petowner has no intention of ill-treating or abandoning the dog and is grieving over her lost dog.

It is NOT an offence to tie a dog to a tree.

YOu are confused and likely so due to working with thick people for too long.

Is it an offence to park my car in a stipulated parking lot?

I await your answer.

 

[Summerbee]

This statement is unnecessary. Many petty thiefts were committed by Malays and Indians, just ask any retailers and taxi drivers.

Let's see who is held accountable when some chinamen decide to raid the shelves.

 

[Ramseth]

It is NOT an offence to tie a dog to a tree.

YOu are confused and likely so due to working with thick people for too long.

Is it an offence to park my car in a stipulated parking lot?

I await your answer.

A parking lot is for you to park a car as long as you pay the rate.

Anyway, your wait is over about pets and trees in public. Chapter 184 Section 12.

If you can't find it in your search to verify it, look under Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order & Nuisance) Act.

 

[ChaoPappyPoodle]

A parking lot is for you to park a car as long as you pay the rate.

Anyway, your wait is over about pets and trees in public. Chapter 184 Section 12.

If you can't find it in your search to verify it, look under Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order & Nuisance) Act.

I appreciate that you are indeed right in that parking versus abandonment or failure to pay the stipulated rate is indeed an alright thing to do.

Tying a dog to a tree is not abandonment which is what I am supposing the issue is with Chapter 184 Sect 12. I can't find the details to the said penal code. Do you have a URL for it?

 

[Ramseth]

I appreciate that you are indeed right in that parking versus abandonment or failure to pay the stipulated rate is indeed an alright thing to do.

Tying a dog to a tree is not abandonment which is what I am supposing the issue is with Chapter 184 Sect 12. I can't find the details to the said penal code. Do you have a URL for it?

Sorry, don't have. Just from recollection. Anyway the law's target is to protect public from their public rights in public parks and roads. Nobody owns them but everybody shares them. So tying animals to public trees, posts or railings, then leaving it unattended may cause nuisance to others and even vandalism, e.g. peeing or shitting. A petowner must keep his/her pet attended to at all times in public.

 

[liketogossip]

You are a PAPdog and if you insist you are not then chances are that you somehow managed to untie yourself from the PAPy tree and found some rat poison infested rojak and are now sharig with us your state of delirium.

Please do not link me with the $$$ loving dog....:oIo::oIo:

i'm certainly in no favor of the actions of the poodle either. Maybe u have mistaken my point.

The police got problem even looking for ONE missing terrorist, what hope have you got that they can find your missing pet? You are just wasting time with the (police) report. They are only good at bullying opposition and common law-abiding citizen.

being able to lodge a report doesnt mean he would get back his dog. shouldnt he spent his time finding it himself and not wasting it on blaming others.

 

[ChaoPappyPoodle]

Please do not link me with the $$$ loving dog....:oIo::oIo:

i'm certainly in no favor of the actions of the poodle either. Maybe u have mistaken my point.



being able to lodge a report doesnt mean he would get back his dog. shouldnt he spent his time finding it himself and not wasting it on blaming others.

You were in a crossroad and you chose the way ehich I felt was offensive to civil society in any decent country.

You had a choice to voice out against one or both of the parties involved and yet you chose to inflict your insensitive views against someone doing no harm and who due to her believe in the honesty of others was led down. And to inflict further grief against her, the police refused to accept that her dog was very likely dognapped.

YOu are indeed a STOMPER. A very credible site purchased for millions of dollars by a GLC.

You had a choice! YOu made your choice! It is obvious where your thoughts and allegiance lie.

 

[Dmode101]

I appreciate that you are indeed right in that parking versus abandonment or failure to pay the stipulated rate is indeed an alright thing to do.

Tying a dog to a tree is not abandonment which is what I am supposing the issue is with Chapter 184 Sect 12. I can't find the details to the said penal code. Do you have a URL for it?

Dont be a cock head. which u r. A pet is still an Animal which by nature is wild no matter how well trained.

Common sense - and you had to dig up a sub law.

What if your little cute little doggy is a monstrous Rottweiller - tugging furiously away from the little plant tree that you loosy tied to fearing it might choke him. A lttle toddler with his mom unaware at the corner walks by....

FUCK YOU you little inconsiderate prick. Just because the law allow dogs as pets doesnt mean you can do as you please.

 

[ChaoPappyPoodle]

Sorry, don't have. Just from recollection. Anyway the law's target is to protect public from their public rights in public parks and roads. Nobody owns them but everybody shares them. So tying animals to public trees, posts or railings, then leaving it unattended may cause nuisance to others and even vandalism, e.g. peeing or shitting. A petowner must keep his/her pet attended to at all times in public.

THe government owns the land and the tree.

But back to the issue at hand. Whatever the stipulations are in the penal code, they are not etched in stone. Jurisprudence, at the end of the day, in a true and free judiciary would have found her act not worthy for a criminal offense.

It's a freaking Jack Russel! It wasn't a bear. The penal code is to prevent people from abandoning their dogs. The question for the courts to answer is how long should the dog be tied before abandonment becomes an issue. Additionally, was the dog in a position to harm others.

Dogs pissing and shitting are allowed as far as I know for as long as the shit is picked up soon after the dog leaves it last meal on the ground. PIssing seems to be allowed on grass areas.

As you said, it is not worth the paperwork. Unless of course if you are a politician from a political party that ... .

 

[ChaoPappyPoodle]

Dont be a cock head. which u r. A pet is still an Animal which by nature is wild no matter how well trained.

Common sense - and you had to dig up a sub law.

What if your little cute little doggy is a monstrous Rottweiller - tugging furiously away from the little plant tree that you loosy tied to fearing it might choke him. A lttle toddler with his mom unaware at the corner walks by....

FUCK YOU you little inconsiderate prick. Just because the law allow dogs as pets doesnt mean you can do as you please.

Go back and learn reading and comprehension. MOngrels like you are indeed a rare breed!

The case in point is a JAck Rusell. ONly a PAPydog will bring up the example of a Rottweiller to proof their idiocy and lack of comprehension of the situation at hand. All you do is to twist and turn the facts to suit your purpose when the facts show what an idiot you truly are for not even knowing how to read and follow a simple trail that rat could follow. Of course a mongrel PAPy dog like you with intelligence becoming of a typical PAPPY will fail everytime.

ABSOLUTE FAIL! :oIo:

Secondly, I didn't bring up the said penal code. Thirdly, it is a good thing that it was brought up so that we can all assimilate something good for the day other than for people like you to share your drivel with the FTs that so love.:oIo:

 

[Ramseth]

Just for fun's sake, I imagine the scenario:

Complainant: Hello, officer, my pet dog is gone.

Police: How come, tell me the details.

Complainant: I went shopping and tied it to a tree outside the supermarket. When I come out, it's gone.

Police: I see, what kind dog is that?

Complainant: It's a Jack Russell.

Police: Oh...(probably having no idea what's that and stalling for time to check. Click click search engine on his computer).

Police: Oh...that's quite a valuable dog.

Complainant: Ya, ya, please record my report and help me find it.

Police: How much's the dog worth actually?

Complainant: Thousands of dollars la!

Police: If someone tie twenty $50 notes to a tree and walk away, then come back expecting to find it again, then I worry about his sanity. If he still wants to make a police report, I don't worry about his sanity. No need worry. Confirmed insane. Next!

 

[liketogossip]

You were in a crossroad and you chose the way ehich I felt was offensive to civil society in any decent country.

You had a choice to voice out against one or both of the parties involved and yet you chose to inflict your insensitive views against someone doing no harm and who due to her believe in the honesty of others was led down. And to inflict further grief against her, the police refused to accept that her dog was very likely dognapped.

YOu are indeed a STOMPER. A very credible site purchased for millions of dollars by a GLC.

You had a choice! YOu made your choice! It is obvious where your thoughts and allegiance lie.

it seems that u are more likely to be a STOMPER :oIo:

only those :oIo:STOMPERs:oIo: like to post this type of complains when they themselves are also at fault.

 

[makapaaa]

They are raking in profits by the hundreds of millions. How much greedier do they want to be? Notice that they are also replacing the aunties with PRC whores at the checkout counters of late!

 

[makapaaa]

http://www.facebook.com/people/Lennie-Hill/702939286

 

[QXD]

How come nobody said some Chinaman trash thought NTUC was giving away fresh food and took the dog back as a dinner delicacy?

 

[Ramseth]

How come nobody said some Chinaman trash thought NTUC was giving away fresh food and took the dog back as a dinner delicacy?

Actually, I don't want to say that (cause some of my dog loving friends will scold me) but from a policing probability point of view, that's high possibility. Recall the Huang Feihong scene:

Rosalind Kwan: I love dogs (they're cute and clever).

Jet Li: I love dogs too (they're delicious).

 

[liketogossip]

They are raking in profits by the hundreds of millions. How much greedier do they want to be? Notice that they are also replacing the aunties with PRC whores at the checkout counters of late!

and yet they still dare to claim that cctv too costly to operate.