• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Wow ST places this letter inthe print edition

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal
Time to scrap it

MORE than anything else, GE 2011 shows how wrong the Group Representation Constituency (GRC) system is, because it produces results that go against the wishes of the entire electorate.

Most of us, whether we voted PAP or the opposition, do not wish Mr George Yeo and Mr Chiam See Tong to be voted out of Parliament. Nor do we wish the PAP's Ms Tin Pei Ling voted in.

The electorate clearly indicated that it wanted about 40 per cent opposition representation. But despite the Workers' Party gains, the number of opposition MPs is at only 7 per cent.

This anomaly is due solely to the GRC system.

Will the next PAP government listen, or will it, as Senior Minister S. Jayakumar has already done, defend the GRC saying 'the system works'? ('Opposition win shows GRC system works: Jaya'; Monday).

What about ensuring that minority groups are represented?

A look at Parliaments before and after GRC shows that minority groups had always been adequately represented by more than 20 per cent of total Members of Parliament. There may not be any real need.

To be sure, we could always provide for nominated representatives - with full voting rights, unlike current Nominated Members of Parliament - from the minority groups.

Richard Seah
 
Last edited:
Top