Why we have to rethink the age of the Universe

[Leongsam]

If you would like to think human eye is one of the least reliable devices on earth, you should not even bring up about the creator.

The creator designed our eyes that way for a purpose and that is for us the realise the folly of our ways.

 

[Eisenhut]

Drawing diagrams, calculations can tell are just vain imaginations

 

[Liquigas]

The creator designed our eyes that way for a purpose and that is for us the realise the folly of our ways.

The universe has no boundary, there is no beginning and there is no end, what place there is for a creator?

 

[Truthspeak]

Heliocentric model has no place for a creator. It started with a big bang which is a “theory” of course. And Atheists do not believe in God aka the creator too.

They believe something can be created out from nothing. They believe in evolution theory too.

Believe, not scientific proven

 

[Leongsam]

The universe has no boundary, there is no beginning and there is no end, what place there is for a creator?

There is no boundary but there could be what is called an event horizon and the creator exists beyond that point.

 

[Truthspeak]

There is no boundary but there could be what is called an event horizon and the creator exists beyond that point.

Is this scientifically proven?

 

[Leongsam]

Is this scientifically proven?

The position of the event horizon can be calculated using this on line tool.

https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/schwarzschild-radius

 

[Truthspeak]

The position of the event horizon can be calculated using this on line tool.

https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/schwarzschild-radius

The calculation doesn’t provide anything scientifically if you can’t even measure it yourself to validate the results

Such tool can only deceive the globetards as they don’t understand science at all.

 

[Leongsam]

The calculation doesn’t provide anything scientifically if you can’t even measure it yourself to validate the results

Such tool can only deceive the globetards as they don’t understand science at all.

We use devices every single day which rely on principles that we cannot measure ourselves but the devices still work reliably and accurately eg the phone or computer that you are using right now.

All solid state silicon circuits are designed based on quantum theory and many values cannot be measured simply because Heisenberg's uncertainty principle makes it impossible. Quantum physics is all about probability not certainty.

 

[Truthspeak]

We use devices every single day which rely on principles that we cannot measure ourselves but the devices still work reliably and accurately eg the phone or computer that you are using right now.

All solid state silicon circuits are designed based on quantum theory and many values cannot be measured simply because Heisenberg's uncertainty principle makes it impossible. Quantum physics is all about probability not certainty.

Maths does not equate to science. If you have an outcome from a certain calculation, but you cannot demonstrate how you can validate the results scientifically then this is a fraud.

 

[Eisenhut]

The universe has no boundary, there is no beginning and there is no end, what place there is for a creator?

Universe has beginning la....singularity tells us

 

[Truthspeak]

Universe has beginning la....singularity tells us

If you cannot demonstrate in terms of science, then you should know if this is even real

 

[Eisenhut]

If you cannot demonstrate in terms of science, then you should know if this is even real

Science say must be measurable, reproducible and observable leh.

Have these criteria all been fulfilled?

 

[Truthspeak]

Science say must be measurable, reproducible and observable leh.

Have these criteria all been fulfilled?

Only your authorities said otherwise. (Example: Covid-19)
The principle of science always requires those criteria

 

[Leongsam]

Maths does not equate to science. If you have an outcome from a certain calculation, but you cannot demonstrate how you can validate the results scientifically then this is a fraud.

The validation is the fact that all devices work the way they should. If the math was faulty nothing would work.

 

[Eisenhut]

The validation is the fact that all devices work the way they should. If the math was faulty nothing would work.

But to extrapolate maths to objects million of miles away and say it is this and that when we do not know if they are even solid or wtf it is, is totally wrong application

 

[Leongsam]

But to extrapolate maths to objects million of miles away and say it is this and that when we do not know if they are even solid or wtf it is, is totally wrong application

It is amazing how much information we can get from the electromagnetic spectrum emitted by an object even though it might be a billion light years away. It's the same sort of technology that is used to determine who should hang for drug smuggling.

Want to know another amazing feat of mathematics? It is simple maths that determines the Lagrange point that now contains the James Webb telescope. Without the math we wouldn't have a clue where to put the telescope in space. The James Webb telescope is at L2.

https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/01F4STZH25YJH07WTN7XJYQP8P

 

[Truthspeak]

It is amazing how much information we can get from the electromagnetic spectrum emitted by an object even though it might be a billion light years away. It's the same sort of technology that is used to determine who should hang for drug smuggling.

Want to know another amazing feat of mathematics? It is simple maths that determines the Lagrange point that now contains the James Webb telescope. Without the math we wouldn't have a clue where to put the telescope in space. The James Webb telescope is at L2.

https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/01F4STZH25YJH07WTN7XJYQP8P

This is just a CGI if you cannot prove using scientific methods

 

[Leongsam]

This is just a CGI if you cannot prove using scientific methods

The proof is in the fact that the JWT is still at L2 after more than 2 years. Without the mathematics to determine where L2 is relative to the earth and the sun it would have drifted off into deep space and would not be sending back stunning images on a regular basis.

 

[Truthspeak]

The validation is the fact that all devices work the way they should. If the math was faulty nothing would work.

No, if the math works perfectly, you should be able to measure it according to the outcome. That is called science. Maths doesn’t prove anything but an assumption