As you can see moderation is not a straightforward task. Those who took on the job asked me to set down the rules.
There are none. Moderation is holistic.
hang him out 2 dry ...[TABLE="class: tborder, width: 90%, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD="class: alt1, align: left"]129005[/TD]
[TD="class: alt1, align: left"]zhihau[/TD]
[TD="class: alt1, align: left"]09:51, 6th Jul 2016[/TD]
[TD="class: alt1, align: left"]Thread merged from multiple threads[/TD]
[TD="class: alt1, align: left"]Thread: [SMRT And MTR Shipping Back Defective Trains Secretly! Guess The Manufacturer?]
Forum: [The Courtyard Café][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
I'll untangle the two later when i have the time. It has to be done post by post
Completely understand. For a moment I thought it was removed as result of yet another lawyer's letter.
Most of the lawyers' letters I get now are for the takedown of some revenge porn that is spreading like wildfire.
I do my small part but the Streisand syndrome ensures that the more threads I delete the more intent the perpetrators are on spreading the images far and wide.
The best thing I can advise victims of revenge porn is to take charge by making more porn and controlling the narrative and quality and make a profit in the process.
Going to a lawyer only adds to the tally of loss and humiliation.
Its now big business among lawyers who specialise in the online and IP space. The recent case of the 2 shoplifting girls in Bangkok is a case in point. Father engaged a lawyer in this space who immediately made contact with the usual templates and got Facebook, SPH etc within 2 hours. Father however forgot to take down his own FB and the daughter as well. He realised it 3 days later.
The revenge porn case involving the Law student some years ago cost the family a fortune as they had to deal with US authorities thru the local lawyers. They ended up doing a deed poll to change her name.
Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian have blazed the trail regarding how to deal with "leaked" porn. Take full advantage of the fame and build an empire.
Done but the thread view count is not accurate anymore.
Completely understand. For a moment I thought it was removed as result of yet another lawyer's letter.
Moderation is holistic.
You did the right thing but then again you didn'tI placed the two threads together for congruence of subject matter![]()
I placed the two threads together for congruence of subject matter![]()
Let me guess the other thread was started by scroobaals and he wanted it unmerged from johntan's thread to earn more glory am i right here?
Done but the thread view count is not accurate anymore.
Let's say you are right about that and scroobals wants more glory that only makes him the same as most other people.