allow me to explain further. I find it disconcerting because everything looks so similar in practice yet they are so ready and willing to kill each other because of differences... hope this makes more sense.
Because it's a copy and paste thing.
Now Moses, he was no pro religion. He just went up the mountain to get the ten commandments. Is just a simple rule God gave to the Jews who escaped egyptian enslavement.
But what did the Jews did? They created a religion while Moses was away.prayed to a statue of a heifer .
When moses died, he did not write the Torah. That was created by the Jewish religionists.
When Jesus died, he did not write the bible.that was written by the disciples.
Similarly Mohamed did not write the Quran. That was written some 20 years after his death.who knows if the verses are true or not.
These three religion fight for legitimacy.theirs is the real thing when it's all fake,
Israeli Scholars Discover Corrections, Erasures, Revisions in Oldest Biblical Manuscript
Analysis of Leningrad Codex shows that about a millennium ago, there were several different versions of the Bible that evolved over time
By
Nir Hasson May 14, 2020
SendSend me email alerts
1comments Zen
Subscribe
Anyone who reads the biblical story of the binding of Isaac in the original Hebrew will encounter a small but troubling linguistic problem.
According to the text, after an angel intervenes at the last minute to prevent Isaac from being sacrificed by his father, Abraham, a ram appears to replace Isaac on the altar. “And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold behind him a ram caught in the thicket by his horns” (Genesis 22:13).
But the Hebrew text has an extra word, “ahar,” after the word “ram” that doesn’t fit in the sentence. Traditional commentators have interpreted it as meaning “after” and attached it to the latter half of the sentence, meaning that Abraham saw the ram after it got caught in the thicket.
But another possibility makes the sentence read better in Hebrew. Adding a tiny extra stroke to the final “resh” (the Hebrew letter for “r”) would turn it into a “dalet” (the equivalent of a “d”). That would turn “ahar” into “ehad,” the word for “one,” making the phrase read, “and behold behind him one ram caught in the thicket.”
This version of the text actually existed in early versions of
the Bible. And now it has been discovered again – albeit erased – in one of the two most important biblical manuscripts, the Leningrad Codex.
Scholars from the Academy of the Hebrew Language who have been analyzing the codex discovered that it contains hundreds of corrections meant to bring it into line with the familiar biblical text we know today. The changes were made by erasing, altering or adding letters and vocalization marks.
These changes show that back when the Leningrad Codex was written, roughly a millennium ago, the Jewish bookshelf contained several different versions of the biblical text.
