• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Why is rhe CB Govt Using OUR Reserves to Reserve Jobs for FTrash?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Feb 8, 2009
YOUR LETTERS
</TR><!-- headline one : start --><TR>Govt must take care of citizens first
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I refer to last Sunday's article, 'Jobs being cut during crisis', and the issue of whether foreigners should be let go first in tough times.
My opinion is yes, for a very simple reason: It is every government's job to take care of its citizens first, just as it is a mother's first priority to feed her own child first - rather than someone else's child - when food is scarce.
Many foreign workers or talent come from countries with rich natural resources and more land than Singapore. Even if they were to lose their jobs here, many could still return to their simpler lives in their home countries - where they could afford to get a small plot of land or grow their own food.
This is not an option for Singaporeans in our land-scarce nation.
I believe even permanent residents who have no intention of becoming Singapore citizens must be let go first in a retrenchment. Why save the jobs of those who will pack up and leave anyway after they have earned enough money here? Lor Pek Shyen (Ms)
<!-- end of for each --><!-- Current Ratings : start --><!-- Current Ratings : end --><!-- vbbintegration : start -->
 

popdod

Alfrescian
Loyal
I refer to last Sunday's article, 'Jobs being cut during crisis', and the issue of whether foreigners should be let go first in tough times.

My opinion is yes, for a very simple reason: It is every government's job to take care of its citizens first,
just as it is a mother's first priority to feed her own child first - rather than someone else's child
- when food is scarce.
Many foreign workers or talent come from countries with rich natural resources and more land than Singapore.

Even if they were to lose their jobs here, many could still return to their simpler lives in their home countries -
where they could afford to get a small plot of land or grow their own food.



This is not an option for Singaporeans in our land-scarce nation.
I believe even permanent residents who have no intention of becoming Singapore citizens must be let go first in a retrenchment.

Why save the jobs of those who will pack up and leave anyway after they have earned enough money here?
Lor Pek Shyen (Ms)



I think she will get rebutted.
Not every foreigner had a piece of land to grow food.

:biggrin: :o :biggrin:
 

ahbengsong

Alfrescian
Loyal
I think she will get rebutted.
Not every foreigner had a piece of land to grow food.
:biggrin: :o :biggrin:

more than 90% of foreigners come from countries with lots of land... philippines.. india... thailand... cambodia... all have agricultural industry to fall back on...

tdy.. china is boosting agricultural as a backup for industrial employment...
 
Top