Anybody else find this very strange? any legal experts care to explain? Isnt she considered an accessory/partner in crime too? She is the recipient/beneficiary of the entire $24M ill-gotten gains knowingly. And being in a fiduciary relationship with her husband, its an understatement to say she must have masterminded and participated in it too. If those 4 lesser staff can kana, how come this fugly butch is immune from justice ??
According to ST, it's not known if she together with the two suspended would face charges. In other words, she may well be charged as things unravel. Hopefully she would be charged for proper justice to be done.