• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Which provides interesting News Coverage; Straits Times or Sammyboy forum ?

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Messages
13,160
Points
0
Which provides interesting News Coverage; Straits Times or Sammyboy forum ?
 
of cos sammyboy lah..
a lot of crappy news have been filtered by fellow bros here.

ST filter the bad ones.
SBF filter the good ones. :rolleyes:
 
Definitely this forum. The juicy crappy nonsense that pple pull out of their asses can only be found here. Reliable responsible reporting be damn
 
sammyboy hands down ...

then gutter is good...

channel news asia when i have a bout of constipation.
 
Here you get opinions and critics on both sides.

There you get harmony.

Cheers!
 
If you subscribe to Straits Time they got give free gift and lucky draw.

Sam's neber, am still waiting for Sam to offer. :D
 
If you have heard enough of PAP shit, ST is just a nice packaging of such shit. Whichever way it sounds or looks, you can't rid the stink.

In Sammy boy, I don't deny the stink exist and without proper packaging, but it has all the components of a rojak. If Singaporeans don't like the taste of rojak and prefer to eat shit, I have nothing to say.
 
Sammy bares it all to the bones, tink I shall cancel my ST soon...hahaha! Some of the bros are just best of the best, representing both sides of the coin! Keep it up...
 
Not only interesting news coverage. It should be accurate and uncensored coverage. Out of 100 points, SBF 100, ST 0.
 
Sammy bares it all to the bones, tink I shall cancel my ST soon...hahaha! Some of the bros are just best of the best, representing both sides of the coin! Keep it up...

I trust more in Sammyboy bec. it is uncensored and what's more it is linked to SEX forum and commercial sex.....thus it is more "honest" as it tells you up front what they are doing.

From my experience, those who are involved as pimps and boncers (young Hokkien speaking men standing outside in Geylang) generally are more honest in their recommendations. When they say such-and-such ladies are good, you can trust them with their words. But for those so call educated bastards, their recommedations are usually bad.......pertaining to women or investments. The reason is that they are NOT street smart and they do not have a code of honour.

Those gangsters and uneducated, know that their only means to survive and get your repeat business is by their "words of honour." Wheras the educated ones have their qualifications tofall back on.

The ST is censored good news from PAP about Singapore. Once you have someone controlling a media, you know it is bias.

In Sammy boy, anything goes and I am free to excercise my own adult intelligence to analysis and filter the info. In fact I do learn quite a bit about investment ideas from Sammyboy coffee shop and I made about 35% $56,000 gain) on silver, SLV in the last 3 months.

It started with Sammyboy gossip and then led to Peter Shiff. I then check with my technical analysis on the Exponential Moving Averages of 13, 50 and 200 days and the Convergering Slopes etc.....I then bought just at the time SLV began to take off in Sept 15 this year.

I will never get such ideas from ST bec. to me most of the stock ideas in ST are from losers for only losers continue to support the PAP. They have no bloody backbones to stand on their own. Thus when Sammyboy also involved in SEX Forum, I tend to believe them more bec. they are the free-for-all type. Moreover, they have no agenda or need to censor any news.

I dare challange any of those losers in the Temasek and GIC on investments on a 1 year timeframe and I can easily win them hands down. To me doubling the investments each year is easy as borrow fire.

I simply cannot comprehen how the fuck those army generals can one day in the army and then the next day began their careers as directors of investments in Temasek Holdings. Shit they don't even know what is EMA or Stochastic Process and yet they can be incharge of $billlion.

This is bullshit 101......Singapore style.
 
Back
Top