- Joined
- Jan 6, 2012
- Messages
- 1,598
- Points
- 48
Add this twist on parallel events:
http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Why-Abbas-Was-Secretly-Summoned-To-Saudi-Arabia-513951
In this context, Ibrahim explained that the House of Saud is working to ensure that Palestinians living in Lebanon side with Riyadh, especially in the wake of Prime Minister Saad Hariri's sudden resignation.
Analysts also believe that the House of Saud remains concerned over the prospect of the incorporation of Hamas members into the Palestinian government, amid a push by the group to enhance ties with Iran.
Earlier this month, Hamas’ deputy leader Saleh al-Arouri held a public meeting with Hizbullah chief Hassan Nasrallah in Lebanon, which came just days after a high-ranking Hamas delegation, led by al-Arouri, visited Tehran and met with senior Iranian officials.
In this respect, Mazen Safi, a political analyst based in Gaza, believes that King Salman summoned Abbas in order to position himself as a power broker—while sidelining Iran—ahead of the formation of the Palestinian unity government.
This comes on the backdrop of U.S. special envoy Jared Kushner’s secret trip to Saudi Arabia late last month, which reportedly led to” developments” on the Israeli-Palestinian front. To this end, President Donald Trump is slated to reveal a peacemaking blueprint that is expected to break from the status quo of bilateral talks between the two sides and instead pursue a regional approach to ending the conflict.
View attachment 33208
View attachment 33209
View attachment 33210
Saudi Arabia and other moderate Arab states seem more interested than ever before in solving the Arab-Israeli conflict in order to invest the attention and energy needed to prevent Iran from increasing its dominance in the Middle East.
View attachment 33214
View attachment 33215
The Lebs are hopefully much smarter now - they are one of the most resilient people in that part of the world - loathed admired and feared, men and women alike - not many realise that the power of the Leb diaspora is deeply enthrenched all over the world - if you scratch beneath the surface of the African continent in particular you will find them well-established and flourishing and they are mostly Shia - heck, even Amal Clooney's sister has been in Singapore for over 20 years and she is Druze! But I digress...
http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/aljazeeraworld/2015/10/lebanon-africa-151027114653139.html
Thanks gatehousethetinkertailor. Really appreciate your efforts in posting all this. I used to travel frequently to the ME many years ago in the 80s and 90s and can relate to a lot of what you are saying. Spent a week in Lebanon once with some friends there and agree that the Lebanese are intelligent smart resilient people. They don't call call them the "Arab" Jews for nothing. Many view themselves more as Europeans, at least at that time. I had Muslim and Christian Lebanese on the same table drinking away and eating everything! I agree that while Lebanon will lose big time if the Lebanese are kicked out from KSA, many of these highly qualified and experienced Lebanese are occupying key positions in the financial and other important sectors, so the damage to KSA will also be quite severe. Without the Lebanese diaspora , I can safely say that the ME will not be able to function properly. They are punching above their numbers. These ME countries can only get in so many British and Americans for these higher positions and the Indians are at best not more than middle management.
“Saudi Arabia’s real leverage is about 500,000 Lebanese work in Saudi Arabia, sending home roughly $3billion annually, a tide of remittances that keep Lebanon’s financial and property assets afloat. If these Lebanese were expelled, a dramatic downward spiral would begin”
Side issue here. No wonder Najib wants to be pally with King Salman and MBS. If not the Saudi royalty link to the 1MDB scandal might unravel?!
Since we are on the Lebanese, here are my observations. I am aware of the Lebanese diaspora, they are held in similar vein as Jews, Sindhis in their host countries. All 3 noted for their entrepreneurial and financial acumen but integration and assimilation are a separate manner.
Australia has been a major recipient of the the Diaspora since the 70s and has a sizeable presence in Sydney. They are immersed deeply in state politics. However they are notorious for rife corruption that involves entire families. It has permeated state and municipal councils. It’s for this reason that Australians are prepared to vote Chinese as city majors, ministers even though they late arrivals, it’s not the same for the Lebanese.
It’s this lot that were robbing Chinese and Indian students on student visas because of their laptops and mobile phones though the Australian press were too politically correct to name the ethnicity but when charged their names in the press were a giveaway.
Despite their earlier entry into OZ, the Asians and new Africans have leapfrogged them across the public service and commercial sector.
It’s the same in Africa.
I understand that in the ME and in Gulf countries they are rated well above others of the region in terms of work ethics and ability especially in accounting, finance and sales but organisations are carefull of family ties and private work done with employers resources and IP.
This is a far cry when Beirut was centre of nearly everything good but 2 things seem to have caused much grief to the community - Beirut and Lebanon being made the favourite playground of the regional adversaries and favoured site for proxy wars and their parochialism.
Then you have spectacular individuals such as Jacque Nasser, the general impression however is pretty much divided.
My bet is like the Jews where family ties and creation of wealth led them to lose their homeland, the same speaks to the Lebanese.
Side issue here. No wonder Najib wants to be pally with King Salman and MBS. If not the Saudi royalty link to the 1MDB scandal might unravel?!
May I ask anyone here where if China is in anyway involve in this too? It seemed China has very little or no part in the Middle East except as a customer buying crude
Najib (and his policy towards KSA) is no different from Mahathir (although the latter changed his tune towards KSA earlier this year)
@Smiley
Over the years there has been rumours that Malaysia has approached KSA to station their troops in KSA similar to the Pakistanis in return for hard currency to build their military capability which has been neglected over the year. Any truth to it?with the UN
Malaysia did the same with the UN which is on record.