- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,283
- Points
- 48
I must state these facts on the record:
1. First of all, PM Samak has no reason to leave his post.
2. This is because he has made no attempt to acquire extraordinary powers as PM(amending the constitution to reduce the military influence is only correct because if it wasn't reduced, military oversight would hamper democratic development; in almost all democratic countries, and in Taiwan, the oversight of the military has been removed and have shifted the control to civilians for precisely this: a civilian government should have control of the armed forces and not the other way around. I mean, have you seen the US armed forces rising against the federal government?)
3. His party doesn't control 2/3 majority of Parliament. His government is a coalition of 7 parties which barely scrapped the 51% majority. This is unlike in 2006 when Thaksin had controlled over 2/3 majority through his Thai Rak Thai party.
4. The opposition parties in the Thai government are stronger and act as a safeguard.
5. The PAD has little support in the capital- unlike in 2006 when Bangkok residents joined hands with the military and monarchy to overthrow the Thaksin administration.
6. Most importantly, the PAD is not actually a left-wing opposition movement. Its leaders are unsurprisingly elites from the monarchy and military- and they aren't even democratic. They want the government to act violently against them, so that they can launch a counter-coup, violent if necessary, to overthrow an legitimately elected government, which was elected last year in an election which was free and fair.
7. If the PAD manages to overthrow the government, the Thai people will suffer when they try to close up the country again. After all the genie cannot be put back into the bottle.
8. Besides, don't mix up personal revenge for justice. They are two completely different things. Revenge is about making yourself feel better; justice is about applying the law in a fair fashion that weights the conclusion of both sides and coming to a final conclusion that suits the situation.
I kind of agree with what you say, PAD do has a agenda as to why they are causing all these mess. Latest_H, you place sound argument, without losing the main focus of the problem, which most retards here do when they are placing an argument. You are in my UP list next.
Argument: Precise, concise, logical and most importantly, objective.