Wayang Party Mystery Continues

[scroobal]

Looks like the mystery continues.

Must have been hard for the founders of National Enquirer to put this out. They however still have issues with vocabulary and its meanings. Like the term Non-partisan, the word "association " is now interpreted as not knowing the real identity of the person that they are associating with. I wonder if the series of emails between tham was on why they are not associating with one another.

By the way, FANG is not "associated" with National Enquirer as he was only a guest contributer so no "association" had taken place. The term "guest" was not originally used when he was named in "The Team" in the National Enquirer website as they did not want anyone to associate Fang as a hotel guest or a guest at a party. Just because he was named in the "The Team" in the National Enquirer website does not mean he was associated with the National Enquirer as they had only corresponded via email and his real identity is not known. The fact that his names appears in their website does not mean an association had occurred as his real identity is not known.

If one goes to the home page of National Enquirer for 26th April, Fang's articles ppear in 4 out of 5 with the 5th done by Gaberial Sim. This again does not mean that an association had occurred as his real identity is not known even though 80% of opinion pieces are from Fang. It would be a mistake to associate content with the term associating.

If the above does not make sense, maybe someone else can work out what "association" means.


Disclaimer from Singapore Enquirer: it has nothing to do with Wayang Party blog
April 25, 2009 by admin
Filed under Announcements
Leave a comment
Dear readers,

The purpose of this blog posting is to clarify Singapore Enquirer’s alleged association with Wayang Party’s blog, a question that has been posed to us by other bloggers and by the mainstream press.

Many people have asked about Singapore Enquirer’s association with the Wayang Party blog. We are not owned by Wayang Party and neither are we associated with them in anyway.

The members of Singapore Enquirer DO NOT know the columnists of Wayang Party in person. We have not met one another before.

We have corresponded via email so far. However, we do not have their contact numbers, and we have not corresponded in any way apart from email. Once again, at the risk of repetition, we do NOT know who they are.

Wayang Party pays a honorarium for every video/interview produced by The Enquirer TV which they screen on their blog.

We hereby affirm that we will not be associated in any way, shape or form with Wayang Party’s blog henceforth.

Fang Zhi Yuan from Wayang Party was a guest columnist of The Singapore Enquirer. He has requested to quit the editorial team to focus on his work with Wayang Party.



Jeremy Yau and Timothy Pang

Administrators of The Singapore Enquirer blog

 

[leetahbar]

ngejay is the other missing link. dun overlook this or underestimate his stealth.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

We are related to NOBODY: Tyrannical TOC exerts pressure on bloggers to reveal identities of Wayang Party
April 24, 2009 by admin
Filed under Announcements, Daily Musings
Leave a comment
Dear readers,

Since we leaked that Kenneth Jeyaretnam had not joined TOC formally as a writer as of 22 April 2009, TOC editors have gone on a rampage to exert pressure on bloggers who appeared to be ‘associated’ with us to reveal our identities.

One of them is Mr Ng E Jay of sgpolitics.net who was forced to issue a disclaimer on his blog that he is not associated with us:

“The only extent of my past involvement with Wayang Party is that we sometimes aggregate each others’ articles. I do not have their contact numbers, and we have not corresponded in any way apart from email. Once again, at the risk of repetition, I do NOT know who they are. I hereby affirm that I will not be associated in any way, shape or form with Wayang Party’s blog henceforth.” (read article here)

Poor E Jay was also the target of malicious and slanderous attacks on the Sammyboy Forum by TOC supporters due to his apparent “link” with us while the truth is, E Jay has never met us before in real life.

Jeremy Yau of the Singapore Enquirer was “interrogated” by a TOC editor himself during the recent SDP forum if he knew our identities.

Another blogger was threatened not to have his articles aggregated by TOC if he continues to include a link to our blog on his site.

This sneaky behavior and modus operandi of TOC is becoming a recurring pattern.

If TOC editors wish to meet us, they can always write in to us at [email protected]. Alternatively, they are most welcomed to post comments here.

We have allowed its Chief Editor Choo Zheng Xi to post his response to our article unmoderated.

Choo asked us to furnish proof of the allegations and claimed that Kenneth has already promised to join them.

If this is indeed so, why are they kicking a fuss out of nothing? Why are they behaving like hooligans towards other fellow bloggers?

TOC’s tyranny is laid bare for all to see. It is run by a group of self-serving elitists, political wannabes and tinpot despots with little tolerance for any opposition to its hegemony just like the PAP.

When our blog was first set up, TOC has already asked its inner ”clique” of blogs to ostracize us from the blogging community. It has also levelled baseless accusations at us through the mainstream media without giving us the right of reply with the intent of smearing us. (read here)

To save bloggers who have been aggregating our articles from being targetted by TOC, we would like to state here clearly that:

“Wayang Party is NOT ASSOCIATED or RELATED with any bloggers in any way, shape or form. Neither are any of our guest columnists ASSOCIATED or RELATED to us. We are UNCONTACTABLE except through email”

Nobody from the blogging community has ever met any editors or guest columnists of Wayang Party.

Wayang Party will take responsibility alone for every single word we post here and we shall stand by it to the best of our knowledge.

We urge TOC editors especially the most vindictive Andrew Loh to STOP its harrassment and intimidation of fellow bloggers. Come for our throats directly if you are peeved with us, we are here waiting for you to fix us.

To this effect, we will be changing our “fellowship” section to “recommended reads” to dissociate ourselves from the blogs put on the list so as to protect them from future harrassment by TOC.

We sincerely apologize for any trouble, distress or inconvenience caused.



THE EDITORIAL TEAM

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

born free on Sat, 25th Apr 2009 11:35 am

This andrew loh character thinks he is some blogger mentor or high priest of the internet. He once tried to get a few bloggers to boycott wayang. That e-mail is still circulating around. That was unsuccessful, as the brotherhood kept short circuiting them by keeping the lines open and even secretly influencing the rest of the bloggers to give space to WP. When that didnt work, he tried to label WP as a lunatic fringe site. Then the brotherhood stepped in this time playing the role of the counter weight and this brought the intelligent crowd in such as James Gomez etc. Then they tried to use the MSM to promote TOC as a credible site, but again the brotherhood press rubbished that idea with their well researched long reads. Now both him and Choo doesn’t know what to do anymore, as they can no longer single out WP as the convenient whipping boy of the blogosphere any longer. They are desperate.

TOC should chill out and live and let live. He should just accept the fact that we netizens have a right to choose what we want to read. We dont need another mentor figure he to tell us what we should and should not read. The internet is a free space, keep it independent.

lionheart on Sat, 25th Apr 2009 11:59 am

As for Tan Tarn How of the Institute of Policy Studies and his research assistant, Ms Tan Si Min. Do you really think the brotherhood really cares about them?

It is well know when the IPS recently held their seminar about the blogosphere recently, they stupidly invited ONLY a few bloggers who they believed to be kosher. The dissed off the rest.

The brotherhood responded by asking IPS, why they did they NOT structure their meet as an open session by including everybody who may have wanted to participate in blogosphere. After 3 weeks when no reply emerged from IPS, they slapped a 5 year boycott on them. Just like that!

Do you have any idea how long 5 years is! Or what a boycott may even entail? Personally, I dont agree with what they did. It seems to be very harsh.

But I think it is necessary. As it sends out a very clear message, no one individual, party or institution has a right to impose their values on others online, if you push your case too hard, you will run the risk of the same being done to you. That seems to be the message.

TOC would do well to heed it as well.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

admin on Sat, 25th Apr 2009 12:11 pm

Hi born free,

Thanks for your input.

Of course we are aware of Andrew Loh’s underhanded tricks. We have all the emails he has sent to his sycophants.

We fight in the open. We do not hide behind the veneer of “respectability” and pretend to be gentlemen. We do not circulate emails to smear others behind their backs and neither do we badmouth others.

We have “friends” within TOC who gives us regular updates on what they are up to. We know exactly what their plans are and the background of their columnists. That’s why Choo was shocked we knew so much about them.

We are still gathering evidence. Once we get hold of it, we will go for the juggernaut and Andrew Loh will be hung up to dry. Don’t mess around with us. We are not to be trifled with.

If you think that WP is a lunatic site, state it openly on your blog. Don’t shoot arrows at us when we are not looking.

Netizens have the erroneous impression that we are the agent provocateur, that we have an axe to grind with TOC. The truth is: they have been sniping at us ever since WP is set up because we have the temerity to disagree with them.

Andrew Loh is a damned bloody hypocrite masquerading to be some “blogger mentor” of Singapore’s blogosphere. What a joke! If he is a “mentor”, then pigs can fly!

He is a ticking time bomb in TOC. We are just waiting for him to self-implode.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

This one is particularly for the resident forum pest

Pamela Landy on Sat, 25th Apr 2009 1:38 pm

I’m surprised bloggers like ng E Jay was coerced by TOC into avoiding Wayang Party. It shows he is politically insignificant. The Renegades feel he should step down from politics and keep to being a keyboard critic. If a small fry like TOC can threaten him, he can’t lead.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

fish 'n' chips on Sat, 25th Apr 2009 7:03 pm

Dear Admin

The title of this article
“We are related to NOBODY: Tyrannical TOC exerts pressure on bloggers to reveal identities of Wayang Party”

and may I extract and quote from your another post
http://wayangparty.wordpress.com/2008/10/09/debunking-the-joint-smear-campaign-by-toc-and-st/

“Mr Andrew Loh knows our identities. We were volunteers in the same team during WP’s election campaign in 2006. Andrew first mooted the idea of setting up a credible news blog to us after the May elections and we held preliminary discussions on the matter way before he knew Remy Choo. Or have you forgotten us, Andrew?”

just do not seem to reconcile.

Could you kindly elaborate further?
admin on Sat, 25th Apr 2009 7:34 pm

Hi fish n chips,

It’s very simple. Andrew Loh thinks he knows our identities, but he is not 100% sure, so he wants to confirm it by fishing for info from bloggers whom he thinks know us.

Why is he so curious to confirm it? Let’s for you to figure out for yourself.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Zheng Xi on Sat, 25th Apr 2009 9:27 pm

Hi Wayang,

I think freedom of speech needs to be differentiated from freedom to spread lies. Your assertion that Kenneth is not a TOC writer will be proven to be a lie on Monday. Please look out for his article. You can start preparing your retraction, if you feel responsible enough about the truth to do so.

admin on Sat, 25th Apr 2009 9:44 pm

Hi Zheng Xi,

We stand corrected at that point in time. There’s no need to retract anything. We did not claim that Kenneth will never join TOC. Please note that we did not discount the possibility of any developments in the future which may contradict our original claims.

Can you answer this simple questions?

Is Kenneth a writer of TOC officially at that time our article is published? Yes or No?

So who is telling a lie? You or us?

Are we correct to say that before Kenneth wrote an article for your site proper, he is not officially your senior writer yet?

On 22 April 2009, Kenneth Jeyaretnam has not written a single article for TOC and as such cannot be considered as a writer of TOC and yet TOC went to announce to the whole world that he is already a “senior writer”.

Is that how TOC operate? Well, then we can always claim that we have this and that writer on board when they have not even contributed a single article yet.

Is this plain intellectual dishonesty on your part? We would think so.

Zheng Xi on Sat, 25th Apr 2009 10:02 pm

Kenneth was officially our writer ever since he announced he was joining our team. He agrees he was our writer, and we agree he is our writer. You would like to tell both of us otherwise, perhaps?

Zheng Xi on Sat, 25th Apr 2009 10:05 pm

This was your original accusation:

“From what we heard, Kenneth had met up with Andrew Loh to give him an interview only. He has yet to confirm if he wanted to join TOC.”

It is wrong.

Maybe you want to step up your own recruitment before you criticize ours? =)

admin on Sat, 25th Apr 2009 10:18 pm

Hi Zheng Xi,

This is not what we heard. There is a miscommunication somewhere. Things are not as you have perceived.

We could have easily produced the documentary proof of what we received, but in doing so we would have to close down this site.

If you are interested to know the truth, email us and we take this offline. We really do not wish to embarrass you. Trust us, we are saving your skin for you.

As for wayangparty, we will only put the writer on our list under “Editorial Team” after he wrote the first article for us.

For example, K J promised to write for us a long time ago, but we have never put him on the guest columnist list till his first article was published.

The same goes for James Gomez. There was a month delay before we added him on the list.

We have a few guest columists-in-waiting, but without their first aritlce, we will never put their names now.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Robox on Sun, 26th Apr 2009 1:39 am

Admin: Email TOC and ask them point blank WHAT DO THEY INTEND TO THE WITH THE INFORMATION REGARDING YOUR IDENTITIES.

Also tell them to first work with the PAP and change the environment that the PAP has created in which anonymity is not cowardice, but an essential requirement for Singaporeans’ sense of safety and well being.

smallvice585 on Sun, 26th Apr 2009 7:56 am

Eh.. PAP Internet Brigade, stop publishing more lies here…

killamaru on Sun, 26th Apr 2009 10:16 am

Choo Zheng Xi and Andrew Loh both must think they are some bloggers mentor. The latter even once tried to sell the whole idea of community moderation. While the former spends all his time, back patting himself by coming up with post about how great TOC is every month.

When it comes to bullying people they are very selective. If you notice they dont mind pushing you around here WP only because you have the grace to allow what they write to be posted here. But tell us all one thing, when lets say the brotherhood writes something about these two clowns. Why do they delete their post? Dont believe me go and ask Choo and Loh this. They will not answer this question. They will run and hide underneath their beds. Why? Bc it is a question that shows them as hypocrites they trully are.

Go and pick on someone your own size TOC. Dont come here and elsewhere to demand for information on the identities of other people, dont try to use bully boy tactics. A simple question was asked. Why did you even do that? You dont even have the moral fiber to answer that question plainly. Better still go and pick a fight with the brotherhood, show us all what a real man both of you really are. Go on I dare you!

 

[wayangbaobao]

They are inspired by thio.

 

[cleareyes]

Robox on Sun, 26th Apr 2009 1:39 am

Admin: Email TOC and ask them point blank WHAT DO THEY INTEND TO THE WITH THE INFORMATION REGARDING YOUR IDENTITIES.

Also tell them to first work with the PAP and change the environment that the PAP has created in which anonymity is not cowardice, but an essential requirement for Singaporeans’ sense of safety and well being.

smallvice585 on Sun, 26th Apr 2009 7:56 am

Eh.. PAP Internet Brigade, stop publishing more lies here…

killamaru on Sun, 26th Apr 2009 10:16 am

Choo Zheng Xi and Andrew Loh both must think they are some bloggers mentor. The latter even once tried to sell the whole idea of community moderation. While the former spends all his time, back patting himself by coming up with post about how great TOC is every month.

When it comes to bullying people they are very selective. If you notice they dont mind pushing you around here WP only because you have the grace to allow what they write to be posted here. But tell us all one thing, when lets say the brotherhood writes something about these two clowns. Why do they delete their post? Dont believe me go and ask Choo and Loh this. They will not answer this question. They will run and hide underneath their beds. Why? Bc it is a question that shows them as hypocrites they trully are.

Go and pick on someone your own size TOC. Dont come here and elsewhere to demand for information on the identities of other people, dont try to use bully boy tactics. A simple question was asked. Why did you even do that? You dont even have the moral fiber to answer that question plainly. Better still go and pick a fight with the brotherhood, show us all what a real man both of you really are. Go on I dare you!

Its so funny when the attack had been so one-sided.

There is a chinese idium for this: The theif screaming for the arrest of another theif: It means playing the victim when actually the person is the villian.

So far Wayangparty had failed to put TOC dwn and now, a new blogsite, Tnhe national Enquirer is trying to repeat the same stunt, and worse, claim to have evidence and yet show nothing.

Everyone know in face value who are those in TOC, we all know who is andrew and who r the rest and now we have kenneth, who are the faces behind wayangparty and national enquirer?

showing ur face would mean causing your site to be closed down and alienation from all political factions? I m sure that would happen to both Wayangparty and nationa Enquirer is they do show their faces.

PAP doesnt need to fixed their opponents, they are now fixing themselves.

 

[scroobal]

Just in case anyone has doubts, the use of "us", "we" by wayangparty should be in the singular. Its just one chap with multiple email addresses. His partner split after WP incident where 2 members left WP.

Ejay unfortunately has been a bad judge of character. There is the bob sim incident, SDP/Courtcase/Reform transformation, linking his website with wayangparty twice previously (under different guise until other foruemmers had to tell him) and finally the 3rd time with his own vehicle National Enquirer. Ejay actually vouched for the infamous hoax wayangparty minibonds interview of a detractor and now claims he has no idea who is the person behind wayangparty.

The brotherhood is mistaken to think that IPS considered the 3 jokers as representative of bloggers. The aim was assess one particular character and one particular question on wayangparty would have given the game away. The follow-up at Adam Road was to continue lay a warm link to establish a particular identity. I know that 2 of them are not known for being astute, so it might have gone over their heads.

The Brotherhood is not a threat to the establishment. It lives in a world of sci-fic like creative space with text and semantics being the highlight of their existence ( and they are dman good at it) and when time permits in between conference calls. Why in the world would IPS seek them out when they are not after blogging per se.

Wayangparty cannot and will not reveal his identity not for political reasons but for the simple fact that an avalanche of lawsuits for slander, defamation etc from a variety of parties. His blog "Wayangparty" originally under wordpress has been singular audit trail of his identity and his actions. He has been hooked on it and has never let go. Previously an ardent supporter of WP, his fallout with party identities (not leaders), his bitter tangle with Andrew (who is more a rabbit looking a grandstand than a thinker) has got the better of him.

 

[leetahbar]

when mentioned about ngejay, we instead have a series of "explanation" from porfiro. how come like that huh? the one doing the explanation should be the nerd himself. why does he need a spokesman to do so. well, unless the "spokesman" is.........

 

[TheBonerman]

when mentioned about ngejay, we instead have a series of "explanation" from porfiro. how come like that huh? the one doing the explanation should be the nerd himself. why does he need a spokesman to do do. well, unless the "spokesman" is.........

hiao cheebye back from weekend cock sucking marathon issit?

 

[leetahbar]

and now it's even clearer - the defences and attacks mode from ngejay's clones. responses from everyone every nasty clones every weird nic....BUT except from the nerd himself.

what a master shapeshifter!! please observe the timing of his clones' postings. you should get a very vivid clue who is behind it.

 

[TheBonerman]

and now it's even clearer - the defences and attacks mode from ngejay's clones. responses from everyone every nasty clones every weird nic....BUT except from the nerd himself.

what a master shapeshifter!! please observe the timing of his clones' postings. you should get a very vivid clue who is behind it.

hiao cheebye ah hiao cheebye, sucking too many cocks had mushed up your brain cells. Won't be long now before you start mistaking dogs for men! Yaiks!:p:p:p

 

[leetahbar]

and again ask yourself this:

why do "unknown strange" clones would come to defence whenever ngejay's name is mentioned and some of his truth is about to be revealed? the description and prowess given to the title ofMASTER SHAPESHIFTER isn't for nothing.

just follow all the clues given and part of the mystery is solved. just like all roads lead to rome, all clones will lead to (fill in the blank)


another important clue: in one of TOC videoclip for RP inauguration dinner. check who is the only one who had his face censored. TOC was trying to protect someone who is too famous. or is it that famous someone request his face be censored?

WHY LIKE THAT? even couple bravely had their faces revealed when walking side by side with him.

 

[leetahbar]

They are actually the same person, you know the bonerman, debonerman, dogtracker, moonwu, papsamleong, fucksamleong etc are the same guy right?
And everytime Ng E-jay's name is mention this cheebye kia will come out without fail

Congrats! you ve just reached ROME!

 

[TheBonerman]

leetah bar hiao cheebye, pot calling kettle black lah. Want to name names hah? kenna exposed as singabagus and singforever and 3Whitetiger how cocksucker? Stick to cock sucking quietly and all will be fine cheebye arse!:p:p:p

 

[leetahbar]

everyone is trying to solve the mystery....and then the "mystery" appears and solves itself.