It should be the fault of the building owner / developer. In the Fire Code 2013, it is stated,
"Accessway shall be metalled or paved or laid with strengthened perforated slabs to withstand the loading capacity of stationary 30 tonnes fire-fighting appliance...."
They may need to pay SCDF for the damage to the engine.
It should be the fault of the building owner / developer. In the Fire Code 2013, it is stated,
"Accessway shall be metalled or paved or laid with strengthened perforated slabs to withstand the loading capacity of stationary 30 tonnes fire-fighting appliance...."
They may need to pay SCDF for the damage to the engine.
It is the Harbourfront MRT station below. http://www.onemap.sg/?LW:Y&wO5d:JahRJ_a,Jchfq_J,JaRYY_I,Jcaaq_a,b |
Keh long man.
I think the engine was there for a routine exercise/ familiarization tour. As such, it should be using the marked access route which was hardened to withstand the weight of the engine. However, as what Johnny had mentioned, too much tunneling has caused the earth below the slabs to sink, causing a hollow.don't see why.....there are areas marked "fire engine hard standing" that are designed specifically for these vehicles.
Mapletree vs SCDF: left hand vs right hand.