I will refrain from putting in my 2 cents at the moment because:
(a) We know SPF is not above such acts
(b) We also know Ah tiongs are capable of fabrication at drop of hat to suit their purposes
Fair enough. Perhaps you can comment on the unusual statement by SPF. Why didn't SPF just state clearly that the allegations are untrue?
Fair enough. Perhaps you can comment on the unusual statement by SPF. Why didn't SPF just state clearly that the allegations are untrue?
Think about it ... if they just said it is untrue they will be accused of covering up of their own men. Anyway like you said, rather wait for GD/Scroobal to comment.
it's an open secret the police will rough up detainees during interrogation... So some FTs broke the law and got whacked ... politicise this for what? Please help sinkies instead.
You don't know how SPF work .. They usually wait for the other party to sue them and after that whack them hard with fines or jail . Maybe brother GD can come in and confirm that policeman whack accused are history .
Maybe brother GD can come in and confirm that policeman whack accused are history .
GD busy hanging flower, allow me to share. camera, yes. but more like cctv around the station and for security purpose. not like those in drama during interview. last time, accused was whack at time and any where in the station. now everywhere got camera, including lock up. last time favourite place to wack accused was in the lock up, like WWF cage match. policeman inside fighting with accused.
(a) We know SPF is not above such acts
(b) We also know Ah tiongs are capable of fabrication at drop of hat to suit their purposes
GD busy hanging flower, allow me to share. camera, yes. but more like cctv around the station and for security purpose. not like those in drama during interview. last time, accused was whack at time and any where in the station. now everywhere got camera, including lock up. last time favourite place to wack accused was in the lock up, like WWF cage match. policeman inside fighting with accused.
Hard to confirm it is history. There are still some in the SPF who behave like SS chaps. From my experience, usually no assault in sensitive cases. More so when confessions aren't needed. Top management will never direct you to 323 the accused person. No one has the balls to give that type of instructions. Not siding the SPF but I think the complaints by the Chinamen involved were made up.
In the 90s, there were discussions on video recording of statements. None of the agencies supported this idea. Let's be honest. If there is no threat, inducement or promise and when the evidence is weak, why would a suspect PG or confess?
In a nutshell, our investigators have not reached the level whereby they are comfortable with their interviewing or interrogation techniques being recorded. All their statements recorded would be thrown out in court. If Dy Dir Investigations CPIB was a flop, need I say more about newer, younger, less experienced investigators?
Very true. Btw, how did the SPF respond? Must admit I have yet to read their comments on this allegation.