- Joined
- Jul 16, 2008
- Messages
- 21,893
- Points
- 113
Are you joking. Russia has more nuclear missiles than anyone else.At the end of the day, 1 side has to lose. My pick is Russia and Bloodymir Putin will become a Fugitive on the run.
Those who still has some brains to reason about, think again. How can Russia alone take up against the US, UK, France and Germany combined? No matter what fucking good weapons Russia has, there's no way for them to win in this battle. Their having to resort to using North Korean troops is already a very pathetic move and is a total disgrace.
Do you believe all their nuclear warheads are serviceable? With so much corruption within their military, I doubt so. Remember what happened to the tyres which were corruptly procured from China 2 years ago?Are you joking. Russia has more nuclear missiles than anyone else.
The only survivors will be the Samoans
Attacking Russia using NATO supplied weapons and NATO personnel to operate is a escalation which if Russia does nothing, NATO will continue to escalate further. It's a kind of like poking for a fight. NATO know Ukraine is a goner. And they now want to join in the war or lose their credibility.Do you believe all their nuclear warheads are serviceable? With so much corruption within their military, I doubt so. Remember what happened to the tyres which were corruptly procured from China 2 years ago?
Nuclear attack with be the last resort because at the end of the day all sides will suffer heavy casualties, whether you like it or not. So, Bloodymir Putin is only threatening as usual. He won't even dare to use it against Ukraine because geographically, the Russians themselves will also be affected by the Nuclear dust since they are adjacent neighbors. Go and study the map, Moscow and St Petersburg are much nearer to Ukraine than Ukraine is to even the UK.
Saying for yourself? What about Russia using 10,000 North Korean Troops and Iranian drones? Tit-for-tat lah. Don't just look at 1 side of the equation.Attacking Russia using NATO supplied weapons and NATO personnel to operate is a escalation which if Russia does nothing, NATO will continue to escalate further. It's a kind of like poking for a fight. NATO know Ukraine is a goner. And they now want to join in the war or lose their reputation.
War means death and destruction to both sides, its the fucking Americans stirring shit again; so tat when both Europe n Russia collapse, America will rule them... the Americans themselves will not take part, tat's for sureDon't think the NATO troops will be willing to fight this meaningless war...
Europe is not going to collapse. Don't underestimate them. Americans are not going to occupy Europe. They don't have oil reserves. Instead, they will be an additional burden and liability to America instead. Do your maths properly before coming to any insensible conclusion.War means death and destruction to both sides, its the fucking Americans stirring shit again; so tat when both Europe n Russia collapse, America will rule them... the Americans themselves will not take part, tat's for sure
If you think NATO cannot take on Russia and win the war, look at this video:Are you joking. Russia has more nuclear missiles than anyone else.
The only survivors will be the Samoans
It is a FACT that there is no nuclear warhead to begin with. How to have a nuclear war? With delusions? Only sheeple believes in liesDo you believe all their nuclear warheads are serviceable? With so much corruption within their military, I doubt so. Remember what happened to the tyres which were corruptly procured from China 2 years ago?
Nuclear attack with be the last resort because at the end of the day all sides will suffer heavy casualties, whether you like it or not. So, Bloodymir Putin is only threatening as usual. He won't even dare to use it against Ukraine because geographically, the Russians themselves will also be affected by the Nuclear dust since they are adjacent neighbors. Go and study the map, Moscow and St Petersburg are much nearer to Ukraine than Ukraine is to even the UK.
You forgot it was russia that voluntarily withdrew from europe.Saying for yourself? What about Russia using 10,000 North Korean Troops and Iranian drones? Tit-for-tat lah. Don't just look at 1 side of the equation.
It's also about time that NATO will prove its effectiveness. Otherwise, even some forumers here (myself included) are already criticizing that NATO is No Action Talk Only. A WW3 is long overdue.
By attacking Ukraine, Russia had already lost its credibility to Sweden and Finland. They'd chose to join NATO and by doing so, what has Russia to gain? Fucking bastard chee bye kia Bloodymir Putin had made the wrong move.