• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Uncle Leong: PA's "adverse" comments by auditors since 2008 more serious

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
The People’s Association (PA) was reported to have received an “adverse opinion” in its latest financial statements, and has been receiving the same rating since 2008. The adverse opinion, purportedly the worst possible in the grading of financial statements, was caused by PA’s failure to include the financial statements of grassroots organisations (GROs) under its charge.

The revelation was made on news website TR Emeritus yesterday and has been spreading online since.

PA has subsequently issued a media statement to clarify that the adverse opinion was related to only “one reason”, in reference to the lack of clarity on the financial status of its GROs.

It is not clear how severe this single infringement might have been to trigger an adverse opinion, nor was it clear why PA was unable to rectify the situation since 2008.

PA offered that “the funds in these accounts belong to grassroots organisations, which are operationally self-funding. Further, all GROs are subject to proper procurement procedures, financial controls and good corporate governance practices.”

No separate financial statements from the GROs were provided to support this claim.

PA also indicated that it has “taken steps to consolidate all grassroots accounts into its financial statements, to be in full compliance with the financial reporting standards for statutory boards” and “is on track to present a fully consolidated accounts for FY 2013”.

The report by TR Emeritus came to light following a much publicised debate between the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) and the Ministry of National Development (MND) over the “disclaimer of opinion” that AHPETC received for its financial statement.

TR Emeritus also indicated that Dr Ernest Kan, President of the Institute of Singapore Chartered Accountants (ISCA) and Pasir Ris Punggol grassroots leader, had earlier agreed with MND that the audit findings on AHPETC are “serious”.

The adverse opinion that PA received is technically worse than what AHPETC received. Dr Kan has not as yet commented on PA’s rating.

Following the revelation of AHPETC’s rating, Sylvia Lim, chairman of AHPETC, has been....

http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/201...e-opinion-in-financial-statements-since-2008/
 
PA?

when I read PA, laurel and palmer mango-gate comes to my mind immediately.

how much of PA funds when into these type of incentive tours?
 
PA?

when I read PA, laurel and palmer mango-gate comes to my mind immediately.

how much of PA funds when into these type of incentive tours?

Testing my accuracy. Will come back to this thread in due time if i am right. :D
 
PA?

when I read PA, laurel and palmer mango-gate comes to my mind immediately.

how much of PA funds when into these type of incentive tours?

Your guess is as good as mine. ;)

41288_1602106334923_8220008_n+(1).jpg


47804_1602156056166_2601210_n+(1).jpg


zhuhai-2.jpg
 
As usual WP incompetence trying to distract others with issues have have been addressed
 
As usual WP incompetence trying to distract others with issues have have been addressed
hahaha....have to disagree in this case...
the jury is still out there as PA “is on track to present a fully consolidated accounts for FY 2013”....some motherhood statement only.
 
If this whole event is orchestrated by wp, then things are certainly moving in their favor. It appears that wp wouldn't mind blowing up the audit issue because they are out to expose the missing 1.12 million under "CCC special project receivables". Note that CCC is under PA and such funds come from them. With AG brought into the picture and the silly press shouting that it is a serious matter, it fall in place nicely for someone to bring out the PA audit rating out of the blue; a prelude to why wp was unable to provide details for their account. The action of getting AG may end up like a boomerang, curving back and hit the PA.
 
I agree that Ernest Kan about adverse opinion. I think he needs to be investigated by international independent agencies.
 
I think a CSI on all the debauchery and illegal money making at PA in spite of ripping the people off 500 million annually is in order.
 
Back
Top