• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

U.S. Says Disputed Islands Covered by Defense Treaty With Japan

Muthukali

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
By Bloomberg News - Sep 21, 2012 10:28 AM GMT+0800

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell said islands at the heart of a dispute between Japan and China fall under an American defense pact with Japan, while urging the sides to resolve the standoff via diplomacy.

“We want to focus more on issues associated with the maintenance of peace and stability and less on the particular details of this very complex and challenging matter,” Campbell told a hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s East Asian and Pacific Affairs subcommittee yesterday. He said the islands fall under a treaty which obligates the U.S. to defend Japan if it’s attacked.

The U.S. doesn’t take a position on the sovereignty of the islands, known as Diaoyu in Chinese and Senkaku in Japanese, Campbell said. His comments echoed those of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who said in 2010 that the islands fall under “mutual treaty obligations” with the Tokyo government.

Japan’s purchase last week of the islands triggered protests and attacks on Japanese businesses in China, straining ties between Asia’s two biggest economies. In a meeting with U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta this week, Chinese Defense Minister Liang Guanglie said his government reserves the right to take further action in the worst diplomatic crisis between the two countries since 2005.

“We have stated very clearly that we want this issue to be resolved peacefully through dialogue between Japan and China,” Campbell said. The U.S. is concerned “by recent demonstrations, and frankly the potential for the partnership between Japan and China to fray substantially in this environment,” he said.

Competing Claims
China claims that it’s owned the islands for centuries, while Japan argues it took administrative control of them in 1895, lost control of them after World War II and had the islands returned to it by the U.S. in 1972. The dispute sparked demonstrations across China, including at the Japanese embassy in Beijing and the consulate in Shanghai. Japanese retailers yesterday reopened stores in China as protests waned.

Panetta said Sept. 19 in Beijing that China must move beyond the “deep wounds” caused by Japan in World War II in addressing present-day issues such as the island dispute. He also said the Japan-U.S. alliance shouldn’t be viewed by China as American support for the Japanese point of view on the island standoff.

Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, a Chinese- speaking former diplomat, today during a visit to Singapore said he is concerned about “the capacity for escalation” in the dispute.

“Calm heads are necessary, restraint is necessary and I’m optimistic that leaders on both sides in Tokyo and Beijing will be able to manage this,” Rudd told reporters.

To contact Bloomberg News staff for this story: Nicholas Wadhams in Beijing at [email protected]

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Peter Hirschberg at [email protected]
 
Top