- Joined
- Nov 24, 2008
- Messages
- 23,396
- Points
- 113
The Malaysian case came to light due to the high profile murder of the Mongolian model. Suaram took up the case with the French authority following the unsatisfactory murder trial which reveals some damning facts linking it to the submarine deal.
In SG's case, there was no suggestion of foul play. For what reason would the French authority open an investigation?
Really, the murder of a Mongolian citizen in malaysia is no concern to the French. But, during the trail, there were alleged wrongdoings in the submarine deal, as part reason for the murder. The fact is, the submarine bribery was alleged and not found to be fact in a malaysian court of law.
In Singapore's case, the newspapers and media, and govt. will never confess to anything, even if they suspected bribery happened. Given the fact that DCNS is involved in so many corruption scandals, foul play SHOULD also be suspected in the SIngapore purchase. U don't think its funny that no contract price is mentioned? What have you got to lose? If you go to the French and say "Look, u have a company, DCNS, running around bribing everyone in sight to make a sale, can u investigate them whether they also bribed SIngapore officials?" WOrse come to worse, they say no, we don't want to investigate. We are no better off than. If they say no, than just wait until the PAP is kicked out atthe next election, and than hire a forensic accountant and open the whole can of worms.