$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
my opinion of SMrt as an organisation ruled by lau char born feminists. There was once when I was chewing a gum and inside a lift with one lau char bor in their Hq at North Bridge,she looked at me as if I offended or not allowed to chew gum, that stern look. Taxi co just changed their Taxi head, also a lau char bor. One thing I dislike about Smrt Taxis, a bit a bit cost you moneY But it is known as the school for drivers. I think you ask some kind uncles when you take cab,they may give you other opinions. Comfort, so far I see those uncles in their forties dame beng but they have advantage of having more call bookings.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Hi Bro KRAFTY ,
1. My friend 's was recently driving his Car "A" and
had stopped at a zebra crossing to allow pedestrian
to cross .
2. While at a stationary ( ie Car "A" ) position a Blue taxi
( let's called it Car "B" ) came from behind and grazed
the backside bumper of Car "A" .
3. The standard exchanged of driver's details were done.
Pictures of damage parts were taken by the driver of Car "A"
4. Car " A " made a report to
idac the same day.
5. Car "A" followed up with a "
Third Party" claims through
his lawyers ( law firm recommended by the workshop )
Repair cost about S$1,500/- and survey fee about S$250/-.
6. Now , the situation is like this : The Taxi driver now
through his Insurer , has produced an independent witness
( very likely the back sit passenger at that time of the
accident ) statement to support his version of the accident.
With this independent witness statement ( i really doubt this
statement because : how can a back sitted passenger
could have witnessed the accident when in front of his eyeballs
is the front sit 's
head rest ... ? )
The third party insurers' current position is that this accident
was caused substantially , if not, solely by my friend's fault
for reversing his vehicle Car "A" at the zebra crossing thus
hitting Car "B".
7. This is totally Not fair . Why does Car "A" need to reverse
at a zebra crossing. Furthermore , Car "A" 's brake light is activated.
Car "A" also have fully working reverse sensor.
8. My friend , Car "A" , is now worried that he might lose this
claim if he goes to Trial . He faces the prospect of paying
" solicitor and client costs " and also "party and party costs "
9. What is the chance that my friend ( Car "A" ) win 100%
10 Definitely the independent witness is likely the rear sit
passenger . I doubt his version of the statement .
Surely the passenger will support the taxi driver.
How to in-validate this passenger 's statement ?
Thanks Bros for your help ....